On the Minkowski-type inequality for outward minimizing hypersurfaces in Schwarzschild space
Yong Wei

TL;DR
This paper proves a sharp Minkowski-type inequality for outward minimizing hypersurfaces in Schwarzschild space using weak solutions of inverse mean curvature flow, advancing geometric analysis in general relativity.
Contribution
It establishes a new Minkowski-type inequality specific to Schwarzschild space, utilizing inverse mean curvature flow techniques.
Findings
Proved the sharp Minkowski-type inequality in Schwarzschild space.
Applied weak solutions of inverse mean curvature flow.
Enhanced understanding of geometric inequalities in general relativity.
Abstract
Using the weak solution of Inverse mean curvature flow, we prove the sharp Minkowski-type inequality for outward minimizing hypersurfaces in Schwarzschild space.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On the Minkowski-type inequality for outward minimizing hypersurfaces in Schwarzschild space
Yong Wei
Mathematical Sciences Institute, Australian National University, ACT 2601 Australia
Abstract.
Using the weak solution of Inverse mean curvature flow, we prove the sharp Minkowski-type inequality for outward minimizing hypersurfaces in Schwarzschild space.
Key words and phrases:
Inverse mean curvature flow, Minkowski inequality, Outward minimizing, Schwarzschild space
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
53C44, 53C42
1. Introduction
The Schwarzschild space is an -dimensinal () manifold with boundary , which is conformal to , with the metric
[TABLE]
where is a constant, . The coordinate sphere is the horizon of the Schwarzschild space and is outward minimizing. Equivalently, and
[TABLE]
where is the unique positive solution of and is the canonical round metric on the unit sphere . In this paper, we will denote
[TABLE]
which is called the potential function of . As is well known, the Schwarzschild space is asymptotically flat, and is static in the sense that the potential function satisfies
[TABLE]
where is the Ricci tensor of , and are gradient, Hessian and Laplacian operator with respect to the metric on . It can be easily checked that the spacetime metric on solves the vacuum Einstein equation. In particular, (1.4) implies that has constant zero scalar curvature .
Let be a bounded domain with smooth boundary in . Then there are two cases:
- (i)
has only one boundary component and we say that is null-homologous;
- (ii)
has two boundary components and we say that is homologous to the horizon of the Schwarzchild space.
The boundary hypersurface is said to be outward minimizing if whenever is a domain containing then . From the first variational formula for area functional, an outward minimizing hypersurface must be a mean-convex hypersurface.
The main result of this paper is the following Minkowski-type inequality for outward minimizing hypersurface in Schwarzschild space.
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be a bounded domain with smooth and outward minimizing boundary in the Schwarzschild space . Assume either
- (1)
, or
- (2)
* and is homologous to the horizon.*
Then
[TABLE]
where is the area of the unit sphere , and is the area of with respect to the induced metric from . Moreover, the equality holds in (1.5) if and only if is a slice .
For mean convex and star-shaped hypersurface in Schwarzschild space, the inequality (1.5) was obtained by Brendle-Hung-Wang [3] as the limit case of their inequality in Anti-de Sitter-Schwarzschild space. Note that a star-shaped hypersurface must be homologous to the horizon of the Schwarzchild space. Our result does not require the hypersurface to be star-shaped. The inequality (1.5) is a natural generalization of the classical Minkowski inequality for convex hypersurface in , which states that
[TABLE]
The inequality (1.6) was originally proved for convex hypersurfaces using the theory of convex geometry and was proved recently by Guan-Li [7] for mean convex and star-shaped hypersurfaces using the smooth solution of inverse mean curvature flow (IMCF). Huisken recently applied the weak solution of IMCF in [10] to show that the inequality (1.6) also holds for outward minimizing hypersurfaces in (see [9]). The proof of this result was also given by Freire-Schwartz [6]. By letting , the Schwarzschild metric reduces to the Euclidean metric and the potential function approaches to . Thus Theorem 1.1 generalizes the result of Huisken and Freire-Schwartz to that for outward-minimizing hypersurfaces in Schwarzchild space.
To prove Theorem 1.1, we use the standard procedure in proving geometric inequalities using the hypersurface curvature flows (see e.g.,[3, 6, 7, 10]). We will employ the weak solution of IMCF, which was developed by Huisken-Ilmanen in [10] and was applied to prove the Riemannian Penrose inequality for asymptotically flat -manifold with nonnegative scalar curvature. The weak solution of IMCF has also been applied in many other problems, see for example [1, 2, 6, 12]. In our case, if is homologous to the horizon, then starting from there exists the weak solution of IMCF which is given by the level sets of a proper locally Lipschitz function , where denotes the compliments of in . Each is away from a closed singular set of Hausdorff dimension at most and will become close to a large coordinate sphere as . On each we define the following quantity
[TABLE]
where is the area of . is well-defined because each is with small singular set, the weak mean curvature of can be defined as a locally function using the first variation formula for area. We will prove that is monotone non-increasing along the weak solution of IMCF. If is null-homologous, we first fill-in the region bounded by the horizon to obtain a new manifold and then run the weak IMCF in with initial condition . When the flow nearly touches the horizon , we jump to the strictly minimizing hull of the union . Assume that , we show that
[TABLE]
which implies that does not increase during the jump. Then we restart the flow from . The restriction on the dimension in this case is due to that we need to jump to the strictly minimizing hull before we restart the flow, and is only known to be smooth, more precisely for . In summary, under the assumption of Theorem 1.1 we can prove that the quantity is monotone decreasing in time along the weak solution of IMCF.
Once we have the monotonicity of , the next step is to estimate the limit when . For this, we will use the property that the weak solution becomes close to a large coordinate sphere as as shown in [10, §7]. The estimate that we will prove is the following:
[TABLE]
Then the main inequality (1.5) follows immediately from the monotonicity of and the estimate (1.8) on its limit. To complete the proof of Theorem 1.1, we need to show the rigidity of the inequality. If the equality holds in (1.5), from the proof of the monotonicity in §4 we know that must be homologous to the horizon and is umbilic a.e. for almost all time. This can be used to show that is an Euclidean sphere if it is considered as a hypersurface in with respect to the Euclidean metric. The last step is to show that is a sphere centered at the origin. We will use the property that a hypersurface to be umbilic is invariant under the conformal change of the ambient metric and the totally umbilic of for almost all time.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In §2, we review some properties of the weak solution of IMCF. For more detail, we refer the readers to Huisken-Ilmanen’s original paper [10]. In §3, we show how to derive the monotonicity of in the case that the flow is smooth. In §4, we use the approximation argument to show the monotonicity of under the weak IMCF. In the last section, we estimate the limit of as and complete the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Acknowledgments**.**
The author would like to thank Ben Andrews, Gerhard Huisken, Pei-Ken Hung and Hojoo Lee for their suggestions and discussions, and Haizhong Li, Mu-Tao Wang for their interests and comments. The author would also like to thank the referee for helpful comments. The author was supported by Ben Andrews throughout his Australian Laureate Fellowship FL150100126 of the Australian Research Council.
2. Weak solution of IMCF
Let be the Schwarzschild space. The classical solution of IMCF is a smooth family of hypersurfaces satisfying
[TABLE]
where are the mean curvature and outward unit normal of , respectively. If the initial hypersurface is star-shaped and strictly mean convex, the smooth solution of (2.1) exists for all time , and the flow hypersurfaces converge to large coordinate sphere in exponentially fast, see [13, 17]. In general, without some special assumption on the initial hypersurface, the smoothness may not be preserved, the mean curvature may tend to zero at some points and the singularities develop. See for example the thin torus in Euclidean space ([10, §1]), i.e. the boundary of an -neighborhood of a large round circle. The mean curvature is positive on this thin torus, so the smooth solution of (2.1) exists for at least a short time. By deriving the upper bound of the mean curvature along the flow, we can see that the torus will steadily fatten up and the mean curvature will become negative in the donut hole in finite time.
In [10], Huisken-Ilmanen used the level-set approach and developed the weak solution of IMCF to overcome this problem. The evolving hypersurfaces are given by the level-sets of a scalar function via
[TABLE]
Whenever is smooth with non vanishing gradient , the flow (2.1) is equivalent to the following degenerate elliptic equation
[TABLE]
Using the minimization principle and elliptic regularization, Huisken-Ilmanen proved the existence, uniquess, compactness and regularity properties of the weak solution of (2.2). The existence result only require mild growth assumption on the underlying manifold, and applies in particular to the Schwarzchild space here. We summaries their results in the following.
Theorem 2.1** ([10]).**
Let be a bounded domain with smooth boundary in the Schwarzschild space with and . In case that is null-homologous, we fill-in the region bounded by the horizon. Then there exists a proper, locally Lipschitz function on , called the weak solution of IMCF with initial condition , satisfying
- (a)
, . For , and define increasing families of hypersurfaces.
- (b)
The hypersurfaces (resp. ) minimize (resp. strictly minimize) area among hypersurfaces homologous to in the region . The hypersurface strictly minimizes area among hypersurfaces homologous to in .
- (c)
For , we have
[TABLE]
locally in in , . The second convergence also holds as .
- (d)
For almost all , the weak mean curvature of is defined and equals to , which is positive and bounded for almost all .
- (e)
For each , , and if is outward minimizing.
For , the regularity and convergence are also true away from a closed singular set of dimension at most and disjoint from .
Note that in [8], Heidusch proved the optimal regularity for the level sets and away from the singular set . The property (b) says that and are minimizing hull and strictly minimizing hull in . Here we call a set a minimizing hull in if minimizes area on the outside in , that is, if
[TABLE]
for any of locally finite perimeter containing such that , and any compact set containing . Here denotes the reduced boundary of a set of locally finite perimeter. is called a strictly minimizing hull if equality implies that . Define to be the intersection of all strictly minimizing hulls in that contain . Up to a set of measure zero, may be realised by a countable intersection, so itself is a strictly minimizing hull and open. We call the strictly minimizing hull of in .
The existence result of weak IMCF in Theorem 2.1 was proved using a minimization principle (see [10, §1]), together with the elliptic regularization. Consider the following perturbed equation
[TABLE]
on a large domain defined using a subsolution of (2.2), with Dirichilet boundary condition on and on the boundary . This equation (2.4) has the geometric interpretation that the downward translating graph
[TABLE]
solves the smooth IMCF (2.1) in the manifold of one dimension higher. Using the compactness theorem to pass the solutions of (2.4) to limits as , we obtain a family of cylinders in , which sliced by gives a family of hypersurfaces weakly solving (2.2). Similar techniques to show existence of weak solutions of geometric flows have been used by various authors, cf. [5, 11, 14, 15, 16].
From the argument in [10, §3], we find that there exits a sequence of smooth function such that locally uniformly in to a function . and are uniformly bounded in . For a.e. , the hypersurfaces converges to the cylinder locally in away from the singular set . Moreover, as in [10, §5], the mean curvature of converges to the weak mean curvature of the cylinder locally in sense for a.e. . Precisely,
[TABLE]
for any cut-off function . The weak second fundamental form exists on in and the lower semicontinuity implies
[TABLE]
for a.e. . Slicing this families by , we obtain and . Since solves the smooth IMCF, its mean curvature in is
[TABLE]
The mean curvature of considered as a hypersurface in is
[TABLE]
Since the limit function of has a.e. on , using the weak convergence of (as in the proof of Lemma 5.2 in [10]), we have that the second term on the right hand side of (2) converges to zero locally in sense as . Thus, the mean curvature of the sliced hypersurface converges to the weak mean curvature of locally in sense for a.e. .
3. The smooth case
As we mentioned in §1, the key step to prove Theorem 1.1 is to show the monotonicity of defined in (1.7) along the weak IMCF. In this section, we firstly show how to derive the monotonicity of in the smooth case. Let be a smooth solution of the IMCF (2.1). It’s well known that the following evolution equations for the area form and mean curvature of in hold.
Lemma 3.1**.**
[TABLE]
Employing the above two evolution equations, we can derive the monotonicity of in the smooth case.
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let be a smooth solution of the IMCF (2.1). For any , if is homologous to the horizon for all , then
[TABLE]
with equality holds if and only if each is totally umbilic for . If is null-homologous for all , then
[TABLE]
with equality holds if and only if each is totally umbilic for , and is strictly decreasing in time , where
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case that is homologous to horizon has been treated in [3, 13]. For convenience of readers, we include the proof here. Using the evolution equations (3.1)–(3.2),
[TABLE]
where we used in the last inequality. Combining the identity
[TABLE]
and the static equation (1.4), we have
[TABLE]
Substituting (3.4) into (3.3) yields that
[TABLE]
If equality holds in (3.5), then and is totally umbilical.
If is homologous to the horizon for all , then denote denote the region bounded by and the horizon . Applying the divergence theorem and noting that on , we get
[TABLE]
which is a constant. Thus we obtain
[TABLE]
If is null-homologous for all , we have
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Thus the theorem follows directly from (3.6)–(3.7) and the evolution equation of the area
[TABLE]
∎
4. The monotonicity
Firstly, we prove the following lemma which was inspired by Lemma A.1 of [6].
Lemma 4.1**.**
Suppose that is a smooth bounded domain in and . Let be a smooth proper function with . Let , and be Lipschitz and compactly supported in . Then satisfies
[TABLE]
where denote the unit outward normal, mean curvature and second fundamental form of the level sets of , be the gradient operator on and .
Proof.
The Sard’s theorem implies that the level set is regular ( on ) for a.e. . Let be the open subset where . For any regular level set with outward unit normal , in the variation vector field along is and . By the second variation formula for area, we have
[TABLE]
in , where denotes the Laplacian operator with respect to the induced metric on . We multiply (4.2) by and integrate over .
[TABLE]
where we used the divergence theorem in the second equality. Applying the identity (3.4), we obtain
[TABLE]
As is regular for a.e. , the coarea formula and (4.3) imply that
[TABLE]
We firstly assume that . Then in the open subset , we have
[TABLE]
where is the divergence operator on . Since is compactly supported in , integrating (4) yields that
[TABLE]
where we used the divergence theorem and (4).
We now deal with the last term in (4). Since is regular for a.e. , the co-area formula and the first variation formula for area imply that
[TABLE]
where in the second equality we used the fact that on . Substituting (4) into (4) yields that
[TABLE]
for . Since Lipschitz function can be approximated by function up to a set of measure zero (see [18, p.32]), we conclude that (4.8) also holds for Lipschitz function by approximation. ∎
4.1. The case that is homologous to horizon
Lemma 4.2**.**
Let be a smooth bounded domain in the Schwarzschild space . Suppose that the boundary and is outward minimizing. Let be the weak solution of IMCF in with initial data . Then for all ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
As in the discussion in §2, the weak solution of IMCF can be approximated by smooth proper functions locally uniformly in , with convergence of the level sets away from the singular set and convergence of the weak mean curvature of level sets for a.e. . Moreover, we can show that converges to the mean curvature of the weak solution of IMCF in locally sense in any domain . In fact, by the coarea formula and (2.7)–(2),
[TABLE]
where , and . By the fact that a.e. on and the weak convergence of , we have that as . Similarly we have the convergence of .
For any nonnegative Lipschitz function with compact support in and , by (4.1) we have
[TABLE]
where we used in the last inequality. Taking the limit of , and using the convergence of and , we obtain that
[TABLE]
As is the weak solution of IMCF, we have a.e. in . Also note that by Rademacher’s theorem, the Lipschitz function is differentiable a.e. in . From the coarea formula and (4.10), we have
[TABLE]
For any and , define by
[TABLE]
The left hand side of (4.1) is equal to
[TABLE]
Since for a.e. , the level set of converges to in away from the singular set of Hausdorff dimension at most with convergence of the weak mean curvature, taking the limits in (4.1), we find that for a.e.
[TABLE]
To show (4.12) holds for all pair of , we use the convergence (2.3) and the weak convergence of mean curvature. For any , we can find a sequence of time such that satisfies (4.12), then in away from the singular set as by (2.3). As the weak mean curvature of equals to a.e. and is uniformly bounded for a.e. , it follows from the Riesz Representation theorem that (see (1.13) in [10])
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
and (4.12) holds for all and a.e. with . Similarly for any with , we can find a sequence of time such that satisfies (4.12). By the convergence (2.3) and (4.13), we have
[TABLE]
Recall that Heidusch [8] proved the optimal local regularity for the level sets and away from the singular set . By [10, (1.15)] the weak mean curvature of and satisfy
[TABLE]
As the weak mean curvature is nonnegative on , we deduce that
[TABLE]
Thus by (4.14)–(4.16), we conclude that (4.12) holds for all pair of . Since is assumed to be outward minimizing, (4.12) is also true for .
Finally, for the first integral on the right hand side of (4.12), using the divergence theorem and noting that on , we get
[TABLE]
by first computing on and then passing to limits. Inserting (4.17) into (4.12), we obtain the inequality (4.9) for all pair of . ∎
Proposition 4.3**.**
Under the assumption of Lemma 4.2, the quantity is monotone non-increasing for all . Moreover, if for some pair , we have that is umbilic a.e. for a.e. .
Proof.
By Gronwall’s lemma, (4.9) implies that
[TABLE]
for all . Since is outward minimizing, Theorem 2.1 implies that for all . Then the quantity is monotone non-increasing for all . If for some pair , from the proof of Lemma 4.2, we have that a.e. on for a.e. . ∎
4.2. The case that is null homologous
Now we consider the case that the bounded domain has boundary , which is null-homologous and outward minimizing. By the argument in [10, §6], we fill-in the region bounded by the horizon to obtain a new space , and then run the weak IMCF in with initial condition , except that when the flow is nearly entering the filled-in region , we jump to a strictly minimizing hull enclosing . Then we restart the flow from .
\Omega_{t_{1}}$$F$$W$$\Omega$$\Sigma_{t_{1}}$$\Sigma$$\partial FFigure 1: is strictly minimizing hull of and W$$(M^{n},g)
Suppose that is the jump time. Then before , each is null homologous. Using the divergence theorem as in (4.17), we have that if . The similar argument as in Lemma 4.2 and Proposition (4.5) implies that
[TABLE]
is monotone non-increasing in time if . As is increasing and the mass , we have that is strictly decreasing for .
Lemma 4.4**.**
* is away from a singular set of Hausdorff dimension at most .*
Proof.
If , then is and is smooth, which combined with the Regularity Theorem 1.3 (ii) of [10] implies that is . If , then has singular set of Hausdorff dimension at most . By the variational formulation of the weak solution of IMCF described in [10, §1], minimizes in among sets of locally finite perimeter with , where
[TABLE]
and is any compact set containing . Since is bounded above locally uniformly by Theorem 3.1 of [10], the obstacle satisfies the assumption of the main theorem in [4] (see also Proposition 2 of [19] ). Therefore, as the strictly minimizing hull of , has boundary which is away from a singular set of Hausdorff dimension at most . ∎
Since is outward minimizing and , we have
[TABLE]
Now we assume that . As is with nonnegative bounded weak mean curvature, the standard Calderon-Zygmund estimate implies that is of class for all . We can choose a sequences of sets containing by mollification such that is smooth and converges to in . The Regularity Theorem 1.3 and (1.15) of [10] imply that is and on . Thus
[TABLE]
It can be seen that and in . Passing to limits and using the nonnegativity of the weak mean curvature on , we obtain
[TABLE]
The estimates (4.18)–(4.19) imply that the quantity defined in (1.7) does not increase during the jump. Similar as in [10, §6], we can show that is a suitable initial condition to restart the flow. We approximate in by a sequence of smooth hypersurfaces with uniformly bounded mean curvature and , using Lemma 6.2 of [10]. Then by Regularity Theorem 1.3 and (1.15) of [10], is and has uniformly bounded mean curvature as well. It can be checked that converges to in . Then slightly mollifying shows that is approximated in by smooth hypersurfaces with uniformly bounded mean curvature. The Existence Theorem 3.1 of [10] gives a solution of weak IMCF with initial condition , and uniform bounds on the gradient . Passing to the limits and applying the Compactness Theorem 2.1 of [10], we obtain the solution of the weak IMCF with initial condition . The proof of Proposition 4.5 and the argument in [10, p.407] imply that is monotone non-increasing in for along the weak IMCF with the initial condition . Thus we conclude that is monotone non-increasing for all time .
Proposition 4.5**.**
Let and be a bounded domain with smooth boundary in the Schwarzschild space . Assume that is outward minimizing. Then is monotone non-increasing for all time along the weak IMCF.
5. Proof of the main theorem
In §4, we proved that the quantity is monotone non-increasing along the weak IMCF. In this section, we first estimate the limit of as .
Proposition 5.1**.**
We have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Denote by the asymptotic flat end of . The Schwarzschild metric on is
[TABLE]
For any , define the blow down object by
[TABLE]
Let be such that . Then and the blow down Lemma 7.1 of [10] implies that
[TABLE]
in as . As in the proof of Lemma 7.1 of [10], there exist constants depending only on the dimension such that
[TABLE]
By the property (d) of the weak solution of IMCF, we have
[TABLE]
for a.e. sufficiently large , where we have used (5.2) to relate to . The mean curvature of with respect to the metric satisfies
[TABLE]
for a.e. sufficiently large . Write as graphs of functions over . By (5.2) and (5.4), for any sequence of time such that (5.4) holds for time , we have the weak convergence of the mean curvature
[TABLE]
Recall that
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Then by (5.2), and (5.4) – (5.6), we have that
[TABLE]
Observe that is a fixed constant and goes to infinity as . Therefore
[TABLE]
which combined with the monotonicity of yields the estimate (5.1). ∎
We now complete the proof of our main theorem.
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Proposition 5.1 together with the monotonicity of yields the inequality (1.5) in Theorem 1.1 immediately. To complete the proof of Theorem 1.1, it remains to prove the rigidity of the inequality (1.5).
If equality holds in (1.5) for , then for all . Then the initial hypersurfae must be homologous to the horizon, because if not, should be strictly decreasing during the jump as described in §4.2. From the proof of Lemma 4.2, the fact that for all also implies a.e. on for almost all time . Since is smooth and outward minimizing, Theorem 2.1 implies that locally in as . We can choose a sequence of time with and converges to locally in as . The lower semicontinuity implies
[TABLE]
and then is totally umbilic in the Schwarzchild space . Denote the Schwarzschild metric on , where
[TABLE]
Let and be the unit outward normal, mean curvature and shape operator of with respect to . Then they satisfies the following transformation formula under the conformal change of the ambient metric:
[TABLE]
where and are the trace-less second fundamental forms of in with respect to the metrics and respectively. Equation (5.8) says that the totally umbilicity of a hypersurface is invariant under the conformal change of the ambient metric. Then is totally umbilic in with respect to the Euclidean metric and therefore is a sphere in .
We next show that is a sphere centered at the origin in , and is a slice if considered as a hypersurface in the Schwarzschild space. Suppose that the radius of the sphere is . Then the mean curvature of in is and
[TABLE]
This implies that the mean curvature of in the satisfies . Since is strictly mean convex, starting from there exists a unique smooth solution to the IMCF (2.1) in Schwarzschild space, which coincides with the weak solution for a short time by the Smooth Start Lemma 2.4 of [10]. Arguing similarly as before, each is a sphere in . By the conformal transformation formulas (5.7), solves the following corresponding flow in Euclidean space
[TABLE]
Under the flow (5.10), the shape operator of in evolves by
[TABLE]
As in (5.9),
[TABLE]
where , and is a function given by
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Since is totally umbilic for , the trace-less second fundamental form is zero for all time . Then
[TABLE]
where denotes the tangential part of the position vector. It follows that on and is independent of the direction . This can occur only if position vector is parallel to the normal vector at and each is a sphere centered at the origin. Therefore, each is a slice in the Schwarzschild space. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] H. Bray and P. Miao, On the capacity of surfaces in manifolds with nonnegative scalar curvature . Invent. Math. 172 (2008), 459–475.
- 2[2] H. Bray and A. Neves, Classification of prime 3-manifolds with Yamabe invariant greater than ℝ ℙ 3 ℝ superscript ℙ 3 \mathbb{RP}^{3} , Ann. of Math. 159 (2004), 407–424.
- 3[3] S. Brendle, P.-K. Hung and M.-T. Wang, A Minkowski-type inequality for hypersurfaces in the Anti-de Sitter-Schwarzschild manifold , Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 69 (2016), no. 1, 124–144.
- 4[4] E. Barozzi, U. Massari, Regularity of minimal boundaries with obstacles , Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universita di Padova, 66 (1982), 129–135.
- 5[5] L.C. Evans and J. Spruck, Motion of level–sets by mean curvature, I , J. Differential Geom. 33 (1991), 635–681.
- 6[6] A. Freire and F. Schwartz, Mass-capacity inequalities for conformally flat manifolds with boundary , Comm. PDE, 39 (2014), no.1, 98–119.
- 7[7] P. Guan and J. Li, The quermassintegral inequalities for k-convex starshaped domains, Adv. Math. 221 (2009), 1725–1732.
- 8[8] M. Heidusch, Zur Regularität des inversen mittleren Krümmungsflusses, Ph D thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen (2001).
