A Note on Geodesics in Hayward Metric
Takeshi Chiba, Masashi Kimura

TL;DR
This paper analyzes geodesics in Hayward's non-singular black hole metric, revealing unique features like photon spheres and stable orbits, and visualizes black hole images showing bright rings even without a photon sphere.
Contribution
It provides a detailed study of geodesic structures in Hayward's metric, including critical parameters and visualizations, highlighting differences from classical black holes.
Findings
Photon sphere exists without horizon.
Multiple marginally stable circular orbits identified.
Bright rings appear even without photon sphere.
Abstract
We study timelike and null geodesics in a non-singular black hole metric proposed by Hayward. The metric contains an additional length-scale parameter and approaches the Schwarzschild metric at large radii while approaches a constant at small radii so that the singularity is resolved. We tabulate the various critical values of for timelike and null geodesics: the critical values for the existence of horizon, marginally stable circular orbit and photon sphere. We find the photon sphere exists even if the horizon is absent and two marginally stable circular orbits appear if the photon sphere is absent and a stable circular orbit for photons exists for a certain range of . We visualize the image of a black hole and find that blight rings appear even if the photon sphere is absent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
A Note on Geodesics in Hayward Metric
Takeshi Chiba
Department of Physics, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Tokyo 156-8550, Japan
Masashi Kimura
CENTRA, Departamento de Fisica, Instituto Superior Tecnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Avenida Rovisco Pais 1, 1049 Lisboa, Portugal
(March 14, 2024)
Abstract
We study timelike and null geodesics in a non-singular black hole metric proposed by Hayward. The metric contains an additional length-scale parameter and approaches the Schwarzschild metric at large radii while approaches a constant at small radii so that the singularity is resolved. We tabulate the various critical values of for timelike and null geodesics: the critical values for the existence of horizon, marginally stable circular orbit and photon sphere. We find the photon sphere exists even if the horizon is absent and two marginally stable circular orbits appear if the photon sphere is absent and a stable circular orbit for photons exists for a certain range of . We visualize the image of a black hole and find that blight rings appear even if the photon sphere is absent.
pacs:
98.80.Cq, 98.80.Es
I Introduction
A non-singular model of a black hole was proposed by Hayward hayward . As such, it may be a solution of an ultraviolet complete gravity such as biswas . The geodesics in such a non-singular spacetime would illuminate some basics aspects of the spacetime, as the geodesics in the Schwarzschild spacetime do chandra .
In this paper, we summarize the results of our study of the properties of geodesics in the geometry described by the Hayward metric in a self-contained manner. Some of the results may be already known (e.g., wei ; schee ), but the detailed study of both the properties of marginally stable circular orbits and the behaviour of null geodesics are new as far as we know.
In Sec. II, after giving the radii of the horizons of the spacetime, we study the properties of timelike geodesics and null geodesics. Sec. III is devoted to summary. In Appendix A, we summarize the properties of the geodesics in the Reissner-Nordström metric.
We use the units of .
II Geodesics in Hayward Metric
The Hayward metric is given by hayward
[TABLE]
where is a mass parameter and is a length-scale parameter. The metric approaches as and approaches unity smoothly as and hence is non-singular. The metric is “minimal” in the sense that it contains the least number of free parameters ( only) with the desired properties (regularity at the center such that and Schwarzschild asymptotic behaviour at large radii. In fact, Frolov has recently shown that if is a rational function of , the order of the polynomials must be larger than 2 and an constructed out of polynomials of order 3 contains two free parameters in general frolov .
We may compute the effective energy momentum for the metric Eq. (II) via as done in hayward . 111 The method for computing in this way is sometimes called “Nariai method” in Japanese GR community. Then, the energy density , the radial pressure and the tangential pressure are given by hayward
[TABLE]
and we find that the weak energy condition is satisfied: and that the strong energy condition is violated for since .
Henceforth, we normalize the length scale by and introduce the dimensionless parameter
[TABLE]
and use as a dimensionless variable.
II.1 Horizon
The location of a horizon is determined by , and horizons (outer horizon and inner horizon ) exist for hayward ,
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
The upper bound on implies the lower bound on , . The implications of this lower bound on the formation and the evaporation of black holes are discussed in hayward . In Fig. 1, we show the radii of the horizons (black curve). The causal structure is quite similar to the Reissner-Nordström black hole: corresponds to Reissner-Nordström black hole, the only exception being that the central singularity is replaced with a regular center.
II.2 Timelike Geodesics
From the spherical symmetry, we may restrict ourselves to the equatorial plane without loss of generality. In terms of two conserved quantities, the energy and the angular momentum , the timelike geodesics satisfy the energy equation
[TABLE]
where with being the proper time.
A marginally stable circular orbit (MSCO) is determined by the condition which reduces to the following equation for 222If , where and are polynomials of order and , respectively, the degree of the equation becomes .
[TABLE]
and the innermost such an orbit is called the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO). Then, is determined by
[TABLE]
We find that Eq. (9) has one positive real solution for and three positive real solutions for and one positive real solution for , where is given by
[TABLE]
However, both two of the solutions for and one solution for are turned out to have imaginary and are unphysical, where
[TABLE]
so there is no ISCO for . After all, there is one ISCO for and two MSCOs for and no ISCO for . In Fig. 1 and Fig.2, we show the radii of ISCO or MSCO (blue curve) and the angular momentum. The angular momentum of the inner MSCO for is arbitrary large as .
In Fig. 3, we show the allowed region for the stable circular orbit (gray). The light gray region in the middle is the unstable orbit . The lower white region is forbidden because the angular momentum is imaginary or the radius is inside the horizon.
In order to study the properties of circular orbits, we calculate the energy of a particle in circular orbit as a function the radius for as shown in Fig. 4 . The extrema of the energy correspond to MSCOs: for the minimum is the outer MSCO and the maximum is the inner MSCO. The region in between two MSCOs (dashed curve) is unstable because there. The outer MSCO can be reached from a particle in circular orbit outside by its emitting energy and angular momentum. On the other hand, since the energy of the inner MSCO is larger than (the energy at large ), the inner MSCO is unbound and may be regarded as an “excited state” that cannot reached from a particle in circular orbit outside. In this sense, only the outer MSCO may be physically important. For , there is also a stable circular orbit with large and .
II.3 Null Geodesics
As in the case of the timelike geodesics, in terms of and , the null geodesics satisfy
[TABLE]
where with being the affine parameter.
Since is the impact parameter at large , the (local) maximum of the effective potential determines the capture cross section for photons and hence the size of shadow of a black hole: photons with smaller impact parameter will be captured by the black hole. The location of the (local) maximum of , or the radius of unstable circular orbits of photons (photon sphere photon ), , is determined by
[TABLE]
Similarly to the case of ISCO, we find that the maximum of exists if , where is defined in Eq. (12). In Fig. 1 we show the radius of photon sphere (red solid). There also appears a stable circular orbit of photon (red dashed) for . The appearance of a stable circular photon orbit is inevitable in the presence of the photon sphere (local maximum of ) since positively diverges as . 333The presence of a stable photon orbit, however, would be problematic because perturbations can become long-lived and nonlinear effects may destabilize the system cardoso . In Fig. 5, we show the radius of the shadow defined by
[TABLE]
In order to study the effect of the geometry on the propagation of light rays, we first compute the deflection of light in the Hayward metric. We consider the deflection of light in the equatorial plane. Then from Eq. (13) and , in terms of the impact parameter , up to the turning point of the deflection, satisfies
[TABLE]
Denoting the turning point of the deflection by at which or , the deflection angle is then given by
[TABLE]
where we have made the change of variables as usual. Expanding in terms of under the assumption is small (weak deflection), the result is
[TABLE]
We show the result only up to , although we can calculate arbitrarily higher orders. The coefficients for fully agree with keeton , but the sign of the coefficient of including is different from wei in which only the numerical values of the coefficient are given and higher-order terms are not given. In terms of the impact parameter using , the deflection angle up to is given by
[TABLE]
Again, we find complete agreement with keeton up to this order if . Since the effect of nonzero appears only for and beyond, it is difficult to detect the effect by the (weak) deflection angle. From the requirement that the fourth term should not dominate the first term by nature , is constrained only as or .
However, the presence of does affect the existence or nonexistence of the photon sphere and hence affects the behaviour of light rays traveling around the photon sphere. In Fig. 6, we show the trajectories of light rays coming in from upper right for . A black circle is the (outer) horizon, red circles are the radii of photon spheres. In Fig. 7, we show the deflection angle as a function of the impact parameter for . If the impact parameter is slightly larger than the radius of a shadow , the deflection angle is logarithmically divergent as
[TABLE]
If , i.e., , the divergent behavior is changed into
[TABLE]
Quite similar behaviour is also found for the Reissner-Nordström metric where critical values corresponding to appear depending on the value of the charge (AppendixA).
The images of a “black hole” are shown in Fig 8. Photons in black regions never reach the observer due to the presence of a horizon or the deflection angle being (modulo ). Photons in white regions travel around the central region more than once, while photons in gray regions reach the observer straightforwardly. The image for is little different from that of Schwarzschild black hole (): A blight ring surrounding a black disk (shadow of a black hole) appears. Interestingly, for , the photon sphere exists even though the horizon is absent; a black disk disappears and a black doughnut appears instead, and a ring image persists. More interestingly, even for , the ring persists although the photon sphere is absent as shown in Fig. 8. Therefore, the existence of a blight ring image does not necessarily imply the existence of a photon sphere. Of course, for astrophysical black holes , where is the Planck length, and these phenomena would be expected only for Planck-scale primordial black holes.
III Summary
In this paper, we have studied the timelike and null geodesics in a non-singular black hole geometry proposed by Hayward that involves a parameter and found several interesting features of the geometry: the existence or non-existence of the horizon, the photon sphere and the ISCO. We also have found that two marginally stable circular orbits appear for although the inner orbit is unbound. The existence of a horizon and/or a photon sphere significantly affects the behaviour of the null geodesics. We have found that a black doughnut appears if the horizon is absent and that blight rings appear even if the photon sphere is absent.
One may think that bright regions in a shadow image are due to the existence of the photon sphere. However, as shown in Fig.8, bright regions also can appear in the spacetime with no photon sphere if the parameter is slightly larger than . For such parameters, while there are no photon sphere, can still take a value larger than (see Fig.7). Similar behavior can be found in the Reissner-Nordström metric. These results suggest that such the shadow images are universal behavior for parameters slightly larger than the critical value where photon sphere marginally exists. The parameter is currently only loosely constrained by the solar-system experiment since the deflection angle at the post-Newtonian order is the same as that of Schwarzschild. The Event Horizon Telescope, a long baseline interferometer experiment, will be able to resolve black holes at horizon scales with the angular resolution of which corresponds to a size of for SgA* at the galactic center eht . If the shadow of a black hole is observed by such a telescope, we may put an constraint on .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work is supported by the MEXT Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (15H05894) and in part by Nihon University. M.K. acknowledges financial support provided under the European Union’s H2020 ERC Consolidator Grant “Matter and strong-field gravity: New frontiers in Einstein’s theory” grant agreement no. MaGRaTh-646597, and under the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015 Grant No. StronGrHEP-690904.
Appendix A Reissner-Nordström metric
The Reissner-Nordström metric is given by
[TABLE]
where are mass and electric charge parameters, respectively. We study the properties of geodesics on this metric and compare the result with the case of the Hayward metric.
Since the electric charge parameter appears in the metric as , we need to consider only. If , there are two horizons at .
In Fig.9, we have plotted the regions of stable and unstable circular orbits. The qualitative feature is same as the case of the Hayward metric Fig.3. When takes , the horizon becomes extremal, the photon sphere marginally exists, the ISCO marginally exists, respectively. The locations of the photon sphere and the shadow image for the Reissner-Nordström metric are also discussed in Zakharov:2014lqa .
Fig.10 shows the deflection angle for null geodesics as a function of the impact parameter . Compared to the case of the Hayward metric (see Fig.7), the qualitative behavior is almost the same. The only difference can be found near the region for small impact parameter in overcharged cases , where the deflection angle is almost . This is because the null geodesic is reflected by the repulsive force near the origin .
If we consider , there is no photon sphere. However, for a parameter value slightly larger than (see the third figure in Fig.10), can still take a value larger than . This means that their shadow image is similar to the fourth figure in Fig.8.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) S. A. Hayward, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 031103 (2006) doi:10.1103/Phys Rev Lett.96.031103 [gr-qc/0506126].
- 2(2) L. Modesto, Phys. Rev. D 86 , 044005 (2012) [ar Xiv:1107.2403 [hep-th]]; T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto and A. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 , 031101 (2012) doi:10.1103/Phys Rev Lett.108.031101 [ar Xiv:1110.5249 [gr-qc]].
- 3(3) S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes , Oxford University Press (1983) .
- 4(4) S. W. Wei, Y. X. Liu and C. E. Fu, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015 , 454217 (2015) doi:10.1155/2015/454217 [ar Xiv:1510.02560 [gr-qc]].
- 5(5) J. Schee and Z. Stuchlik, JCAP 1506 , 048 (2015) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/06/048 [ar Xiv:1501.00835 [astro-ph.HE]].
- 6(6) V. P. Frolov, Phys. Rev. D 94 , no. 10, 104056 (2016) doi:10.1103/Phys Rev D.94.104056 [ar Xiv:1609.01758 [gr-qc]].
- 7(7) K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, Phys. Rev. D 62 , 084003 (2000) doi:10.1103/Phys Rev D.62.084003 [astro-ph/9904193].
- 8(8) V. Cardoso, L. C. B. Crispino, C. F. B. Macedo, H. Okawa and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 90 , no. 4, 044069 (2014) doi:10.1103/Phys Rev D.90.044069 [ar Xiv:1406.5510 [gr-qc]].
