# Evaluating (and Improving) Estimates of the Solar Radial Magnetic Field   Component from Line-of-Sight Magnetograms

**Authors:** K.D. Leka, G. Barnes, E. L. Wagner

arXiv: 1701.04836 · 2017-02-22

## TL;DR

This paper compares the common $$-correction method with a potential field approach for estimating the radial magnetic field component from line-of-sight measurements, finding the potential method superior in active regions with horizontal fields.

## Contribution

It evaluates the effectiveness of the $$-correction versus potential field methods for deriving the radial magnetic field from line-of-sight data, highlighting the advantages of the potential approach in complex regions.

## Key findings

- The $$-correction performs well in regions with predominantly radial fields.
- The potential-field method better recovers radial field strength in active regions.
- Potential-field approach accurately locates magnetic neutral lines.

## Abstract

Although for many solar physics problems the desirable or meaningful boundary is the radial component of the magnetic field $B_{\rm r}$, the most readily available measurement is the component of the magnetic field along the line-of-sight to the observer, $B_{\rm los}$. As this component is only equal to the radial component where the viewing angle is exactly zero, some approximation is required to estimate $B_{\rm r}$ at all other observed locations. In this study, a common approximation known as the "$\mu$-correction", which assumes all photospheric field to be radial, is compared to a method which invokes computing a potential field that matches the observed $B_{\rm los}$, from which the potential field radial component, $B_{\rm r}^{\rm pot}$ is recovered. We demonstrate that in regions that are truly dominated by radially-oriented field at the resolution of the data employed, the $\mu$-correction performs acceptably if not better than the potential-field approach. However, it is also shown that for any solar structure which includes horizontal fields, i.e. active regions, the potential-field method better recovers both the strength of the radial field and the location of magnetic neutral line.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.04836/full.md

## Figures

29 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.04836/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.04836/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.04836