This paper characterizes the primitive ideal space of the partial-isometric crossed product of a $C^*$-algebra by a single automorphism, using its realization as a full corner of a classical crossed product.
Contribution
It provides a detailed description of the primitive ideal space for the partial-isometric crossed product via realization as a full corner, extending understanding of such structures.
Findings
01
Primitive ideal space described explicitly
02
Realization as a full corner used in analysis
03
Connections to classical crossed product theory
Abstract
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. We describe the primitive ideal space of the partial-isometric crossed product A×αpisoN of the system by using its realization as a full corner of a classical crossed product and applying some results of Williams and Echterhoff.
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Full text
The primitive ideal space of the partial-isometric crossed product of a system by a single automorphism
Wicharn Lewkeeratiyutkul
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. We describe the primitive ideal space of the partial-isometric crossed product A×αpisoN of the system by using its realization as a full corner of a classical crossed product and applying some results of Williams and Echterhoff.
Lindiarni and Raeburn in [8] introduced the partial-isometric crossed product of a dynamical system (A,Γ+,α) in which Γ+ is the positive cone of a totally ordered abelian group Γ and α is an action of Γ+ by endomorphisms of A. Note that since the C∗-algebra A is not necessarily unital, we require that each endomorphism αs extends to a strictly continuous endomorphism αs of the multiplier algebra M(A). This for an endomorphism α of A happens if and only if there exists an approximate identity (aλ) in A and a projection p∈M(A) such that α(aλ) converges strictly to p in M(A). We stress that if α is extendible, then we may not have α(1M(A))=1M(A). A covariant representation of the system (A,Γ+,α) is defined for which the endomorphisms αs are implemented by partial isometries, and the associated partial-isometric crossed product A×αpisoΓ+ of the system is a C∗-algebra generated by a universal covariant representation such that there is a bijection between covariant representations of the system and nondegenerate representations of A×αpisoΓ+. This generalizes the covariant isometric representation theory that uses isometries to represent the semigroup of endomorphisms in a covariant representation of the system (see [3]). The authors of [8], in particular, studied the structure of the partial-isometric crossed product of the distinguished system (BΓ+,Γ+,τ), where the action τ of Γ+ on the subalgebra BΓ+ of ℓ∞(Γ+) is given by the right translation. Later, in [4], the authors showed that A×αpisoΓ+ is a full corner in a subalgebra of the C∗-algebra L(ℓ2(Γ+)⊗A) of adjointable operators on the Hilbert A-module ℓ2(Γ+)⊗A≃ℓ2(Γ+,A). This realization led them to identify the kernel of the natural homomorphism q:A×αpisoΓ+→A×αisoΓ+ as a full corner of the compact operators K(ℓ2(N)⊗A), when Γ+ is N:=Z+. So as an application, they recovered the Pimsner-Voiculescu exact sequence in [10]. Then in their subsequent work [5], they proved that for an extendible α-invariant ideal I of A (see the definition in [1]), the partial-isometric crossed product I×αpisoΓ+ sits naturally as an ideal in A×αpisoΓ+ such that (A×αpisoΓ+)/(I×αpisoΓ+)≃A/I×α~pisoΓ+. This is actually a generalization of [2, Theorem 2.2]. They then combined these results to show that the large commutative diagram of [8, Theorem 5.6] associated to the system (BΓ+,Γ+,τ) is valid for any totally ordered abelian group, not only for subgroups of R. In particular, they use this large commutative diagram for Γ+=N to describe the ideal structure of the algebra BN×τpisoN explicitly.
Now here we consider a system (A,α) consisting of a C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. So we actually have an action of the positive cone N=Z+ of integers Z by automorphisms of A. In the present work, we want to study Prim(A×αpisoN), the primitive ideal space of the partial-isometric crossed product A×αpisoN of the system. Since A×αpisoN is in fact a full corner of the classical crossed product (BZ⊗A)×Z (see [4, §5]), Prim(A×αpisoN) is homeomorphic to Prim((BZ⊗A)×Z). Therefore it is enough to describe Prim((BZ⊗A)×Z). To do this, we apply the results on describing the primitive ideal space (ideal structure) of the classical crossed products from [12, 6]. So we consider the following two conditions:
(1)
when A is separable and abelian;
(2)
when A is separable and Z acts on PrimA freely (see §2).
For the first condition, by applying a theorem of Williams, Prim((BZ⊗A)×Z) is homeomorphic to a quotient space of Ω(BZ)×Ω(A)×T, where Ω(BZ) and Ω(A) are the spectrums of the C∗-algebras BZ and A respectively (recall that the dual Z^ is identified with T via the map z↦(γz:n↦zn)). By computing Ω(BZ), we parameterize the quotient space as a disjoint union, and then we precisely identify the open sets. For the second condition, we apply a result of Echterhoff which shows that Prim((BZ⊗A)×Z) is homeomorphic to the quasi-orbit space of Prim(BZ⊗A)=PrimBZ×PrimA (see in §2 that this is a quotient space of Prim(BZ⊗A)). Again by a similar argument to the first condition, we describe the quotient space and its topology precisely.
We begin with a preliminary section in which we recall the theory of the partial-isometric crossed products, and some discussions on the primitive ideal space of the classical crossed products briefly. In section 3, for a system (A,α) consisting of a C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A, we apply the works of Williams and Echterhoff to describe Prim(A×αpisoN) using the realization of A×αpisoN as a full corner of the classical crossed product (BZ⊗A)×Z. As some examples, we compute the primitive ideal space of C(T)×αpisoN where the action α is given by rotation through the angle 2πθ with θ rational and irrational. Moreover the description of the primitive ideal space of the Pimsner-Voiculescu Toeplitz algebra associated to the system (A,α) is completely obtained, as it is isomorphic to A×α−1pisoN. We also discuss necessary and sufficient conditions under which A×αpisoN is GCR (postliminal or type I). Finally in the last section, we discuss the primitivity and simplicity of A×αpisoN.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. The partial-isometric crossed product
A partial-isometric representation of N on a Hilbert space H is a map V:N→B(H) such that each Vn:=V(n) is a partial isometry, and Vn+m=VnVm for all n,m∈N.
A covariant partial-isometric representation of (A,α) on a Hilbert space H is a pair (π,V) consisting of a nondegenerate representation π:A→B(H) and a partial-isometric representation V:N→B(H) such that
[TABLE]
for all a∈A and n∈N.
Note that every system (A,α) admits a nontrivial covariant partial-isometric representation [8, Example 4.6]: let π be a nondegenerate representation of A on H. Define Π:A→B(ℓ2(N,H)) by (Π(a)ξ)(n)=π(αn(a))ξ(n). If
[TABLE]
then the representation Π is nondegenerate on H. Now for every m∈N, define Vm on H by (Vmξ)(n)=ξ(n+m). Then the pair (Π∣H,V) is a partial-isometric covariant representation of (A,α) on H. One can see that if we take π faithful, then Π will be faithful as well, and H=ℓ2(N,H) whenever α(1)=1 (e.g. when α is an automorphism).
Definition 2.1*.*
A partial-isometric crossed product of (A,α) is a triple (B,jA,jN) consisting of a C∗-algebra B, a nondegenerate homomorphism iA:A→B, and a partial-isometric representation iN:N→M(B) such that:
(i)
the pair (jA,jN) is a covariant representation of (A,α) in B;
(ii)
for every covariant partial-isometric representation (π,V) of (A,α) on a Hilbert space H, there exists a nondegenerate representation
π×V:B→B(H) such that (π×V)∘iA=π and (π×V)∘iN=V; and
(iii)
the C∗-algebra B is spanned by {iN(n)∗iA(a)iN(m):n,m∈N,a∈A}.
By [8, Proposition 4.7], the partial-isometric crossed product of (A,α) always exists, and it is unique up to isomorphism. Thus we write the partial-isometric crossed product B as A×αpisoN.
We recall that by [8, Theorem 4.8], a covariant representation (π,V) of (A,α) on H induces a faithful representation π×V of A×αpisoN if and only if π is faithful on the range of (1−Vn∗Vn) for every n>0 (one can actually see that it is enough to verify that π is faithful on the range of (1−V∗V), where V:=V1).
2.2. The primitive ideal space of crossed products associated to second countable locally compact transformation groups
Let Γ be a discrete group which acts on a topological space X. For every x∈X, the set Γ⋅x:={s⋅x:s∈Γ} is called the Γ-orbit of x. The set Γx:={s∈Γ:s⋅x=x}, which is a subgroup of Γ, is called the stability group of x. We say the Γ-action is free or Γ acts on Xfreely if Γx={e} for all x∈X. Consider a relation ∼ on X such that for x,y∈X, x∼y if and only if Γ⋅x=Γ⋅y. One can see that this is an equivalence relation on X. The set of all equivalence classes equipped with the quotient topology is denoted by O(X) and called the quasi-orbit space, which is always a T0-topological space. The equivalence class of each x∈X is denoted by O(x) and called the quasi-orbit of x.
Now let Γ be an abelian countable discrete group which acts on a second countable locally compact Hausdorff space X. So (Γ,X) is a second countable locally compact transformation group with Γ abelian. Then the associated dynamical system (C0(X),Γ,τ) is separable with Γ abelian, and so the primitive ideals of C0(X)×τΓ are known (see [12, Theorem 8.21]). Furthermore, the topology of Prim(C0(X)×τΓ) has been beautifully described [12, Theorem 8.39]. So here we want to recall the discussion on Prim(C0(X)×τΓ) in brief. See more in [12] that this is indeed a huge and deep discussion.
Let N be a subgroup of Γ. If we restrict the action τ to N, then we obtain a dynamical system (C0(X),N,τ∣N) with the associated crossed product C0(X)×τ∣NN. Suppose that XNΓ is the Green’s ((C0(X)⊗C0(Γ/N))×τ⊗ltΓ)−(C0(X)×τ∣NN)-imprimitivity bimodule whose structure can be found in [12, Theorem 4.22]. If (π,V) is a covariant representation of (C0(X),N,τ∣N), then IndNΓ(π×V) denotes the representation of C0(X)×τΓ induced from the representation π×V of C0(X)×τ∣NN via XNΓ. Now for x∈X, let εx:C0(X)→C≃B(C) be the evaluation map at x and w a character of Γx. Then the pair (εx,w) is a covariant representation of (C0(X),Γx,τ∣Γx) such that the associated representation εx×w of C0(X)×Γx is irreducible, and hence by [12, Proposition 8.27], IndΓxΓ(εx×w) is an irreducible representation of C0(X)×τΓ. So \textrm{ker}\ \big{(}\operatorname{Ind}_{\Gamma_{x}}^{\Gamma}(\varepsilon_{x}\times w)\big{)} is a primitive ideal of C0(X)×τΓ. Note if a primitive ideal is obtained in this way, then we say it is induced from a stability group. In fact by [12, Theorem 8.21], all primitive ideals of C0(X)×τΓ are induced from stability groups. Moreover since for every w∈Γx there is a γ∈Γ such that w=γ∣Γx, every primitive ideal of C0(X)×τΓ is actually given by the kernel of an induced irreducible representation IndΓxΓ(εx×γ∣Γx) correspondent to a pair (x,γ) in X×Γ. To see the description of the topology of Prim(C0(X)×τΓ), first note that if (x,γ) and (y,μ) belong to X×Γ such that Γ⋅x=Γ⋅y (which implies that Γx=Γy) and γ∣Γx=μ∣Γx, then by [12, Lemma 8.34],
[TABLE]
So define a relation on X×Γ such that (x,γ)∼(y,μ) if
[TABLE]
One can see that ∼ is an equivalence relation on X×Γ. Now consider the quotient space X×Γ/∼ equipped with the quotient topology. Then we have:
Let (Γ,X) be a second countable locally compact transformation group with Γ abelian. Then the map Φ:X×Γ→Prim(C0(X)×τΓ) defined by*
[TABLE]
is a continuous and open surjection, and factors through a homeomorphism of X×Γ/∼ onto Prim(C0(X)×τΓ).
Remark 2.3*.*
In the theorem above, note that Prim(C0(X)×τΓ) is then a second countable space. This is because as it is mentioned in [12, Remark 8.40], the quotient map q:X×Γ→X×Γ/∼ is open. Moreover, X and Γ both are second countable.
Theorem 2.2 can be applied to see that the primitive ideal space of the rational rotation algebra is homeomorphic to T2. We skip it here and refer readers to [12, Example 8.45] for more details.
2.3. The primitive ideal space of crossed products by free actions
Let (A,Γ,α) be a classical dynamical system with Γ discrete. Then the system gives an action of Γ on the spectrum A^ of A by s⋅[π]:=[π∘αs−1] for every s∈Γ and [π]∈A^ (see [12, Lemma 2.8] and [11, Lemma 7.1]). This also induces an action of Γ on PrimA such that s⋅P:=αs(P) for each s∈Γ and P∈PrimA.
Recall that if π is a (nondegenerate) representation of A on H with kerπ=J, then Indπ denotes the induced representation π~×U of A×αΓ on ℓ2(Γ,H) associated to the covariant pair (π~,U) of (A,Γ,α) defined by
[TABLE]
for all every a∈A, ξ∈ℓ2(Γ,H), and s,t∈Γ. Note that by IndJ, we mean ker(Indπ).
Now let (A,Γ,α) be a classical dynamical system in which A is separable and Γ is an abelian discrete countable group. If Γ acts on PrimA freely, then each primitive ideal kerπ=P of A induces a primitive ideal of A×αΓ, namely IndP=ker(Indπ), and the description of Prim(A×αΓ) is completely available:
Suppose in the system (A,Γ,α) that A is separable and Γ is an amenable discrete countable group. If Γ acts on PrimA freely, then the map*
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
is a homeomorphism, where π is an irreducible representation of A with kerπ=P. In particular, A×αΓ is simple if and only if every Γ-orbit is dense in PrimA.
We can apply the above Theorem to see that the irrational rotation algebras are simple. Readers can refer to [6, Example 10.18] or [12, Example 8.46] for more details.
3. The Primitive Ideal Space of A×αpisoN by automorphic action
First recall that if T is the isometry in B(ℓ2(N)) such that T(en)=en+1 on the usual orthonormal basis {en}n=0∞ of ℓ2(N), then we have
[TABLE]
Now consider a system (A,α) consisting of a C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. Let the triples (A×αpisoN,jA,v) and (A×αZ,iA,u) be the partial-isometric crossed product and the classical crossed product of the system respectively. Here our goal is to describe the primitive ideal space of A×αpisoN and its topology completely. See in [4] that the kernel of the natural homomorphism q:(A×αpisoN,jA,v)→(A×αZ,iA,u) given by q(vn∗jA(a)vm)=un∗iA(a)um, is isomorphic to the algebra of compact operators K(ℓ2(N))⊗A. Therefore we have a short exact sequence
[TABLE]
where μ(Tn(1−TT∗)Tm∗⊗a)=vn∗jA(a)(1−v∗v)vm for all a∈A and n,m∈N. So Prim(A×αpisoN) as a set, is given by the sets Prim(K(ℓ2(N))⊗A) and \operatorname{Prim}\big{(}A\times_{\alpha}{\mathbb{Z}}). With no condition on the system, we do not have much information about \operatorname{Prim}\big{(}A\times_{\alpha}{\mathbb{Z}}) in general. However, by [4, Proposition 2.5], we do know that kerq≃K(ℓ2(N))⊗A is an essential ideal of A×αpisoN. Therefore Prim(K(ℓ2(N))⊗A) which is homeomorphic to PrimA, sits in Prim(A×αpisoN) as an open dense subset. We will identify this open dense subset, namely the primitive ideals {IP:P∈PrimA} of Prim(A×αpisoN) coming from PrimA, shortly. Moreover see in [4, §5] that A×αpisoN is a full corner of the classical crossed product (BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z, where BZ:=span{1n:n∈Z}⊂ℓ∞(Z), and the action β of Z on BZ is given by translation such that βm(1n)=1n+m for all m,n∈Z. Thus Prim(A×αpisoN) is homeomorphic to Prim((BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z), and hence it suffices to describe Prim((BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z) and its topology. To do this, we will consider two conditions on the system that make us able to apply a theorem of Williams and a result by Echterhoff. We will also identify those primitive ideals of A×αpisoN coming from \operatorname{Prim}\big{(}A\times_{\alpha}{\mathbb{Z}}), which form a closed subset of Prim(A×αpisoN). But first, let us identify the primitive ideals IP.
Proposition 3.1**.**
Let π:A→B(H) be a nonzero irreducible representation of A with P:=kerπ. If the pair (Π,V) is defined as in [8, Example 4.6] (see §2), then the associated representation of (A×αpisoN,jA,v), which we denote by (Π×V)P, is irreducible on ℓ2(N,H), and does not vanish on kerq≃K(ℓ2(N))⊗A.
Proof.
To see that (Π×V)P is irreducible, we show that every ξ∈ℓ2(N,H)\{0} is a cyclic vector for (Π×V)P, that is ℓ2(N,H)=span{(Π×V)P(x)(ξ):x∈(A×αpisoN)}. We show that
[TABLE]
equals ℓ2(N,H) which is enough. By viewing ℓ2(N,H) as the Hilbert space ℓ2(N)⊗H, it suffices to see that each en⊗h belongs to H, where {en}n=0∞ is the usual orthonormal basis of ℓ2(N) and h∈H. Since ξ=0 in ℓ2(N,H), there is m∈N such that ξ(m)=0 in H. But ξ(m) is a cyclic vector for the representation π:A→B(H) as π is irreducible. Thus we have span{π(a)(ξ(m)):a∈A}=H, and hence \textrm{span}\{e_{n}\otimes\big{(}\pi(a)\xi(m)\big{)}:n\in{\mathbb{N}},a\in A\} is dense in ℓ2(N)⊗H≃ℓ2(N,H). So we only have to show that H contains each element e_{n}\otimes\big{(}\pi(a)\xi(m)\big{)}. Calculation shows that
[TABLE]
and therefore en⊗(π(a)ξ(m))∈H for every a∈A and n∈N. So we have H=ℓ2(N,H).
To show that (Π×V)P does not vanish on K(ℓ2(N))⊗A, first note that since π is nonzero, π(a)h=0 for some a∈A and h∈H. Now if we take (1−TT∗)⊗a∈K(ℓ2(N))⊗A, then (Π×V)P(μ((1−TT∗)⊗a))=(Π×V)P(j(a)(1−v∗v))=0. This is because for (e0⊗h)∈ℓ2(N,H), we have
[TABLE]
which is not zero in ℓ2(N,H) as π(a)h=0.
∎
Remark 3.2*.*
The primitive ideals IP are actually the kernels of the irreducible representations (Π×V)P which form the open dense subset
[TABLE]
of \operatorname{Prim}\big{(}A\times_{\alpha}^{\operatorname{piso}}{\mathbb{N}}\big{)} homeomorphic to Prim(K(ℓ2(N))⊗A). Now Prim(K(ℓ2(N))⊗A) itself is homeomorphic to PrimA via the (Rieffel) homeomorphism P↦K(ℓ2(N))⊗P. But K(ℓ2(N))⊗P is the kernel of the irreducible representation (id⊗π) of K(ℓ2(N))⊗A, which indeed equals the restriction (Π×V)P∣K(ℓ2(N))⊗A. Therefore we have
[TABLE]
Consequently the map P↦IP is a homeomorphism of PrimA onto the open dense subset U of Prim(A×αpisoN).
Now we want to describe the topology of Prim((BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z)≃Prim(A×αpisoN) and identify the primitive ideals of A×αpisoN coming from A×αZ under the following two conditions:
(1)
when A is separable and abelian, by applying a theorem of Williams, namely Theorem 2.2;
(2)
when A is separable and Z acts on PrimA freely, by applying Theorem 2.4.
3.1. The topology of Prim((BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z) when A is separable and abelian
Suppose that A is separable and abelian. Then (BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z is isomorphic to the crossed product C0(Ω(BZ⊗A))×τZ associated to the second countable locally compact transformation group (Z,Ω(BZ⊗A)). Therefore by Theorem 2.2, Prim((BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z) is homeomorphic to Ω(BZ⊗A)×T/∼. But we want to describe Ω(BZ⊗A)×T/∼ precisely. To do this, we need to analyze Ω(BZ⊗A), and since Ω(BZ⊗A)≃Ω(BZ)×Ω(A) (see [11, Theorem B.37] or [11, Theorem B.45]), we have to compute Ω(BZ) first.
Lemma 3.3**.**
Let {−∞}∪Z∪{∞} be the two-point compactification of Z. Then Ω(BZ) is homeomorphic to the open dense subset Z∪{∞}.
Proof.
First note that BZ exactly consists of those functions f:Z→C such that limn→−∞f(n)=0 and limn→∞f(n) exists. Thus the complex homomorphisms (irreducible representations) of BZ are given by the evaluation maps {εn:n∈Z}, and the map ε∞:BZ→C defined by ε∞(f):=limn→∞f(n) for all f∈BZ. So we have Ω(BZ)={εn:n∈Z}∪{ε∞}. Note that the kernel of ε∞ is the ideal C0(Z)=span{1n−1m:n<m∈Z} of BZ. Now let {−∞}∪Z∪{∞} be the two-point compactification of Z which is homeomorphic to the subspace
[TABLE]
of R. Then the map
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
embeds BZ in C({−∞}∪Z∪{∞}) as the maximal ideal
[TABLE]
Thus it follows that Ω(BZ) is homeomorphic to I^, and I^ itelf is homeomorphic to the open subset
[TABLE]
of C({−∞}∪Z∪{∞})∧ in which each ε~r is an evaluation map. So by the homeomorphism between C({−∞}∪Z∪{∞})∧ and {−∞}∪Z∪{∞}, the open subset {ε~r:r∈(Z∪{∞})} is homeomorphic to the open (dense) subset Z∪{∞} of {−∞}∪Z∪{∞} equipped with the relative topology. Therefore Ω(BZ) is in fact homeomorphic to Z∪{∞}. One can see that Z∪{∞} is indeed a second countable locally compact Hausdorff space with
[TABLE]
as a countable basis for its topology, where Jn:={n,n+1,n+2,...}∪{∞} for every n∈Z.
∎
Remark 3.4*.*
Before we continue, we need to mention that, if A is a separable C∗-algebra (not necessarily abelian), then by [11, Theorem B.45] and using Lemma 3.3, (C0(Z)⊗A) and (BZ⊗A) are homeomorphic to Z×A^ and (Z∪{∞})×A^ respectively. Also Prim(C0(Z)⊗A) and Prim(BZ⊗A) are homeomorphic to Z×PrimA and (Z∪{∞})×PrimA respectively (note that these homeomorphisms are Z-equivariant for the action of Z). Since C0(Z)⊗A is an (essential) ideal of BZ⊗A, we have the following commutative diagram:
[TABLE]
where Θ and Θ~ are the canonical continuous, open surjections, and ι an ι~ are the canonical embedding maps. Now to see how Z acts on (Z∪{∞})×A^ (and accordingly on (Z∪{∞})×PrimA), note that since the crossed products (C0(Z)⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z and (C0(Z)⊗A)×β⊗idZ are isomorphic (see [12, Lemma 7.4]), we have
[TABLE]
for all n,m∈Z and [π]∈A^. Accordingly
[TABLE]
for all n,m∈Z and P∈PrimA.
So when A is separable and abelian, using Lemma 3.3, Ω(BZ⊗A)=(Z∪{∞})×Ω(A). Now to describe ((Z∪{∞})×Ω(A))×T/∼, note that by Remark 3.4, Z acts on (Z∪{∞})×Ω(A) as follows:
[TABLE]
for all n,m∈Z and ϕ∈Ω(A). Therefore, the stability group of each (m,ϕ) is {0}, and the stability group of each (∞,ϕ) equals the stability group Zϕ of ϕ. Accordingly, the Z-orbit of each (m,ϕ) is Z×{ϕ}, and the Z-orbit of (∞,ϕ) is {∞}×Z⋅ϕ, where Z⋅ϕ is the Z-orbit of ϕ. So for the pairs (or triples) ((m,ϕ),z) and ((n,ψ),w) of (Z×Ω(A))×T, we have
[TABLE]
The last equivalence follows from the fact that Ω(A) is Hausdorff. Therefore ((m,ϕ),z) and ((n,ψ),w) are in the same equivalence class in ((Z∪{∞})×Ω(A))×T/∼ if and only if ϕ=ψ, while ((m,ϕ),z)≁((∞,ψ),w) for every ψ∈Ω(A) and w∈T, because
[TABLE]
Thus if ϕ∈Ω(A), then all pairs ((m,ϕ),z) for every m∈Z and z∈T are in the same equivalence class, which can be parameterized by ϕ∈Ω(A). On the other hand, for the pairs ((∞,ϕ),z) and ((∞,ψ),w), we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
which means if and only if the pairs (ϕ,z) and (ψ,w) are in the same equivalence class in the quotient space Ω(A)×T/∼ homeomorphic to \operatorname{Prim}\big{(}A\times_{\alpha}{\mathbb{Z}}). Therefore ((∞,ϕ),z)∼((∞,ψ),w) in ((Z∪{∞})×Ω(A))×T/∼ precisely when (ϕ,z)∼(ψ,w) in Ω(A)×T/∼, and hence the class of each ((∞,ϕ),z) in ((Z∪{∞})×Ω(A))×T/∼ can be parameterized by the class of (ϕ,z) in Ω(A)×T/∼. So we can identify ((Z∪{∞})×Ω(A))×T/∼ with the disjoint union
[TABLE]
Now we have:
Theorem 3.5**.**
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a separable abelian C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. Then Prim(A×αpisoN) is homeomorphic to Ω(A)⊔(Ω(A)×T/∼), equipped with the (quotient) topology in which the open sets are of the form
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since the quotient map q:((Z∪{∞})×Ω(A))×T→Ω(A)⊔(Ω(A)×T/∼) is open, as well as q~:Ω(A)×T→Ω(A)×T/∼, for every n∈Z, every open subset O of Ω(A), and every open subset V of T, the forward image of open subsets {n}×O×V and Jn×O×V by q, forms a basis for the topology of Ω(A)⊔(Ω(A)×T/∼), which is
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
As the open subsets q~(O×V) also form a basis for the quotient topology of Ω(A)×T/∼, we can see that each open subset of Ω(A)⊔(Ω(A)×T/∼) is either an open subset U of Ω(A) or of the form U∪W for some nonempty open subset U in Ω(A) and some open subset W in Ω(A)×T/∼.
∎
Remark 3.6*.*
Under the condition of Theorem 3.5, the primitive ideals of Prim(A×αpisoN) coming from Prim(A×αZ), which form the closed subset
[TABLE]
are the kernels of the irreducible representations (IndZϕZ(ϕ×γz∣Zϕ))∘q corresponding to the equivalence classes of the pairs (ϕ,z) in Ω(A)×T/∼ (again by using Theorem 2.2). Therefore if J[(ϕ,z)] denotes ker(IndZϕZ(ϕ×γz∣Zϕ)∘q), then F={J[(ϕ,z)]:ϕ∈Ω(A),z∈T}, and the map [(ϕ,z)]↦J[(ϕ,z)] is homeomorphism of Prim(A×αZ)≃Ω(A)×T/∼ onto F.
Proposition 3.7**.**
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a separable abelian C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. Then A×αpisoN is GCR if and only if Z\Ω(A) is a T0 space.
Proof.
By [9, Theorem 5.6.2], A×αpisoN is GCR if and only if K(ℓ2(N))⊗A≃kerq and A×αZ≃C0(Ω(A))×τZ are GCR. But since A is abelian, K(ℓ2(N))⊗A is automatically CCR, and hence it is GCR. Therefore A×αpisoN is GCR precisely when A×αZ is GCR. By [12, Theorem 8.43], A×αZ is GCR if and only if Z\Ω(A) is T0.
∎
Proposition 3.8**.**
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a separable abelian C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. Then A×αpisoN is not CCR.
Proof.
Note that A×αpisoN is CCR if and only if (BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z≃C0(Ω(BZ⊗A))×τZ is CCR, because they are Morita equivalent (see [12, Proposition I.43]). Since for the Z-orbit of a pair (m,ϕ), we have
[TABLE]
it follows that Z-orbit of (m,ϕ) is not closed in Ω(BZ⊗A)=(Z∪{∞})×Ω(A). Therefore by [12, Theorem 8.44], C0(Ω(BZ⊗A))×τZ is not CCR, and hence A×αpisoN is not CCR.
∎
Example 3.9*.*
(Pimsner-Voiculescu Toeplitz algebra)
Suppose T(A,α) is the Pimsner-Voiculescu Toeplitz algebra associated to the system (A,α) (see [10]). It was shown in [4, §5] that T(A,α) is isomorphic to the partial-isometric crossed product A×α−1pisoN associated to the system (A,α−1). Therefore when A is abelian and separable, the description of Prim(T(A,α)) follows completely from Theorem 3.5. In particular, for the trivial system (C,id), T(C,id) is the Toeplitz algebra T(Z) of integers isomorphic to C×idpisoN. So again by Theorem 3.5, Prim(T(Z)) corresponds to the disjoint union
{0}⊔T in which every (nonempty) open set is of the form {0}∪W for some open subset W of T. This description is known which coincides with the description of Prim(T(Z)) obtained from the well-known short exact sequence 0→K(ℓ2(N))→T(Z)→C(T)→0.
Example 3.10*.*
Consider the system (C(T),α) in which the action α is given by rotation through the angle 2πθ with θ
rational. By using the discussion in [12, Example 8.46], Prim(C(T)×αpisoN) can be identified with the disjoint union
[TABLE]
in which by Theorem 3.5, each open set is given by
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Moreover the orbit space Z\T is homeomorphic to T, which is obviously T0 (in fact Hausdorff). So it follows by Proposition 3.7 that C(T)×αpisoN is GCR.
3.2. The topology of Prim((BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z) when A is separable and Z acts on PrimA freely
Consider a system (A,α) in which A is separable, and Z acts on PrimA freely. It follows that Z acts on Prim(BZ⊗A) freely too. This is because, firstly, by [11, Theorem B.45], Prim(BZ⊗A) is homeomorphic to PrimBZ×PrimA, and hence it is homeomorphic to (Z∪{∞})×PrimA. Then Z acts on (Z∪{∞})×PrimA such that
[TABLE]
for all n,m∈Z and P∈PrimA. Therefore the stability group of each (∞,P) equals the stability group ZP of P, which is {0} as Z acts on PrimA freely, and stability group of each (m,P) is clearly {0}. So in the separable system (BZ⊗A,Z,β⊗α−1) (with Z abelian), Z acts on Prim(BZ⊗A)≃(Z∪{∞})×PrimA freely. Therefore by Theorem 2.4, Prim((BZ⊗A)×β⊗α−1Z) is homeomorphic to the quasi-orbit space O(Prim(BZ⊗A))=O((Z∪{∞})×PrimA), which describes Prim(A×αpisoN) as well. We want to describe the quotient topology of O((Z∪{∞})×PrimA) precisely, and identify the primitive ideals of A×αpisoN coming from Prim(A×αZ). We have
[TABLE]
Therefore O(m,P)=O(n,Q) if and only if {P}={Q}, and this happens precisely when P=Q by the definition of the hull-kernel (Jacobson) topology on PrimA (that is why the primitive ideal space of any C∗-algebra is always T0 [9, Theorem 5.4.7]). So all pairs (m,P) for every m∈Z have the same quasi-orbit which can be parameterized by P∈PrimA, and since
[TABLE]
O(m,P)=O(∞,Q) for all m∈Z and P,Q∈PrimA. Moreover
[TABLE]
Thus O(∞,P)=O(∞,Q) if and only if Z⋅P=Z⋅Q, which means if and only if P and Q have the same quasi-orbit (O(P)=O(Q)) in O(PrimA)≃Prim(A×αZ). So each quasi-orbit O(∞,P) can be parameterized by the quasi-orbit O(P) in O(PrimA), and we can therefore identify O((Z∪{∞})×PrimA) by the disjoint union
[TABLE]
Then we have:
Theorem 3.11**.**
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a separable C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. Suppose that Z acts on PrimA freely. Then Prim(A×αpisoN) is homeomorphic to PrimA⊔O(PrimA), equipped with the (quotient) topology in which the open sets are of the form
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof.
Note that since by [12, Lemma 6.12], the quasi-orbit map q:Prim(BZ⊗A)→O(Prim(BZ⊗A)) is continuous and open, the proof follows from a similar argument to the proof of Theorem 3.5. So we skip it here.
∎
Remark 3.12*.*
Under the condition of Theorem 3.11, we want to identify the primitive ideals of Prim(A×αpisoN) coming from Prim(A×αZ), which form the closed subset
[TABLE]
homeomorphic to Prim(A×αZ)≃O(PrimA) (see Theorem 2.4). These ideals are actually the kernels of the irreducible representations (Indπ)∘q=(π~×U)∘q of A×αpisoN, where π is an irreducible representation of A with kerπ=P. But since the pair (π~,U) is clearly a covariant partial-isometric representation of (A,α), one can see that in fact, (Indπ)∘q=π~×pisoU, where π~×pisoU is the associated representation of A×αpisoN correspondent to the pair (π~,U). Thus each element of F is of the form ker(π~×pisoU) correspondent to the quasi-orbit O(P), and therefore we denote ker(π~×pisoU) by JO(P). So the map O(P)→JO(P) is a homeomorphism of O(PrimA) onto the closed subspace F of \operatorname{Prim}\big{(}A\times_{\alpha}^{\operatorname{piso}}{\mathbb{N}}\big{)}.
For the following remark, we need to recall that the primitive ideal space of any C∗-algebra A is locally compact [7, Corollary 3.3.8]. A locally compact space X (not necessarily Hausdorff) is called almost Hausdorff if each locally compact subspace U contains a relatively open nonempty Hausdorff subset (see [12, Definition 6.1.]). If a C∗-algebra is GCR, then it is almost Hausdorrff (see the discussion on pages 171 and 172 of [12]). Finally if A is separable, then by applying [11, Theorem A.38] and [11, Proposition A.46], it follows that PrimA is second countable.
Remark 3.13*.*
It follows from [13] that if (A,Z,α) is a separable system in which Z acts on A^ freely, then A×αZ is GCR if and only if A is GCR and every Z-orbit in A^ is discrete. But every Z-orbit in A^ is discrete if and only if for each [π]∈A^, the map Z→Z⋅[π] defined by n↦n⋅[π]=[π∘αn−1] is a homeomorphism, and this statement itself, by [12, Theorem 6.2 (Mackey-Glimm Dichotomy)], is equivalent to saying that the orbit space Z\A^ is T0. Therefore we can rephrase the statement of [13] to say that if (A,Z,α) is a separable system in which Z acts on A^ freely, then A×αZ is GCR if and only if A is GCR and the orbit space Z\A^ is T0.
Proposition 3.14**.**
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a separable C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. Suppose that Z acts on A^ freely. Then A×αpisoN is GCR if and only if A is GCR and the orbit space Z\A^ is T0.
Proof.
The proof follows from a similar argument to the proof of Proposition 3.7 and Remark 3.13.
∎
Example 3.15*.*
Consider the system (C(T),α) in which the action α is given by rotation through the angle 2πθ with θ
irrational. Then Z acts on Prim(C(T))=C(T)=T freely (see [12, Example 8.45] or [6, Example 10.18]). Therefore by Theorem 3.11, Prim(C(T)×αpisoN) can be identified with the disjoint union T⊔O(T). But the quasi-orbit space O(T) contains only one point as each Z-orbit is dense in T (see [12, Lemma 3.29]). Let us parameterize this only point by [math] (note that O(T) is homeomorphic to the primitive ideal space of the irrational rotation algebra Aθ:=C(T)×αZ which is simple). So Prim(C(T)×αpisoN) is actually identified with
[TABLE]
where each open set is given by
[TABLE]
Here we would like to mention that [math] in T⊔{0} corresponds to the primitive ideal K(ℓ2(N))⊗C(T) of C(T)×αpisoN.
Finally, although C(T) is GCR (in fact CCR), the orbit space Z\T is not T0 as each Z-orbit is dense in T. So it follows by Proposition 3.14 that C(T)×αpisoN is not GCR.
Remark 3.16*.*
Recall that since the Pimsner-Voiculescu Toeplitz algebra T(A,α) is isomorphic to A×α−1pisoN (see Example 3.9), if A is separable and Z acts on PrimA freely, then the description of Prim(T(A,α)) is obtained completely from Theorem 3.11.
4. Primitivity and Simplicity of A×αpisoN
In this section, we want to discuss the primitivity and simplicity of A×αpisoN. Recall that a C∗-algebra is called primitive if it has a faithful nonzero irreducible representation, and it is called simple if it has no nontrivial ideal.
Theorem 4.1**.**
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. Then A×αpisoN is primitive if and only A is primitive.
Proof.
If A×αpisoN is primitive, it has a faithful nonzero irreducible representation ρ:A×αpisoN→B(H). Then since the restriction of ρ to the ideal K(ℓ2(N))⊗A≃kerq is nonzero, it gives an irreducible representation of K(ℓ2(N))⊗A which is clearly faithful. So it follows that K(ℓ2(N))⊗A is primitive, and therefore A must be primitive as well.
Conversely, if A is primitive, then it has a faithful nonzero irreducible representation π on some Hilbert space H (P=kerπ={0}). We show that the associated irreducible representation (Π×V)P of A×αpisoN on ℓ2(N,H) is faithful. By [8, Theorem 4.8], it is enough to see that if Π(a)(1−V∗V)=0, then a=0. If Π(a)(1−V∗V)=0, then
[TABLE]
It follows that π(a)h=0 for all h∈H, and therefore π(a)=0. Since π is faithful, we must have a=0. This completes the proof.
∎
Remark 4.2*.*
Note that Theorem 4.1 simply means that in the homeomorphism P↦IP mentioned in Remark 3.2, P is the zero ideal if and only if IP is the zero ideal. This is because if A×αpisoN is primitive, then its zero ideal as one of its primitive ideals is of the form IP (coming from PrimA), as K(ℓ2(N))⊗A=0.
Finally it is not difficult to see that A×αpisoN is not simple. This is because as we see, it contains K(ℓ2(N))⊗A as a nonzero ideal. Moreover if K(ℓ2(N))⊗A=A×αpisoN, then A×αZ≃(A×αpisoN)/(K(ℓ2(N))⊗A) must be the zero algebra. So it follows that A=0, which is a contradiction as we have A=0. Therefore A×αpisoN contains K(ℓ2(N))⊗A as a proper nonzero ideal, and hence we have proved the following:
Theorem 4.3**.**
Let (A,α) be a system consisting of a C∗-algebra A and an automorphism α of A. Then A×αpisoN is not simple.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by Rachadapisek Sompote Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University.
Bibliography13
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
1[1] S. Adji, Invariant ideals of crossed products by semigroups of endomorphisms , Proc. Conference in Functional Analysis and Global Analysis in Manila, October 1996 (Springer, Singapore 1996), 1–8.
2[2] S. Adji and A. Hosseini, The Partial-Isometric Crossed Products of 𝐜 0 subscript 𝐜 0 \mathbf{c}_{0} by the Forward and the Backward Shifts , Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. (2) 33 (3) (2010), 487–498.
3[3] S. Adji, M. Laca, M. Nilsen and I. Raeburn, Crossed products by semigroups of endomorphisms and the Toeplitz algebras of ordered groups , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 122 (1994), no. 4, 1133–1141.
4[4] S. Adji, S. Zahmatkesh, Partial-isometric crossed products by semigroups of endomorphisms as full corners , J. Aust. Math. Soc. 96 (2014), 145–166.
5[5] S. Adji, S. Zahmatkesh, The composition series of ideals of the partial-isometric crossed product by semigroup of endomorphisms , J. Korean. Math. Soc. 52 (2015), No. 4, 869–889.
6[6] S. Echterhoff, Crossed products, the Mackey-Rieffel-Green machine and applications , Preprint (2010), ar Xiv:1006.4975.
7[7] J. Dixmier, C*-algebras, North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 15, North-Holland, New York, 1977.
8[8] J. Lindiarni and I. Raeburn, Partial-isometric crossed products by semigroups of endomorphisms , J. Operator Theory 52 (2004), 61–87.