Wake-mediated propulsion of an upstream particle in two-dimensional plasma crystals
Ingo Laut, Christoph R\"ath, Sergey K. Zhdanov, Vladimir Nosenko,, Gregor E. Morfill, Hubertus M. Thomas

TL;DR
This paper explains the wake-mediated propulsion of an extra particle in 2D plasma crystals through simulations and theory, revealing nonreciprocal interactions cause persistent self-propulsion, aligning well with experimental observations.
Contribution
The study introduces a simple pointlike ion wake charge model to simulate and understand wake-mediated propulsion in plasma crystals, providing new insights into the underlying dynamics.
Findings
Good agreement between simulated and experimental particle velocities.
Nonreciprocal interactions due to wake charges cause persistent particle motion.
The model successfully reproduces the wake-mediated propulsion effect.
Abstract
The wake-mediated propulsion of an "extra" particle in a channel of two neighboring rows of a two-dimensional plasma crystal, observed experimentally by Du et al. [Phys. Rev. E 89, 021101(R) (2014)], is explained in simulations and theory. We use the simple model of a pointlike ion wake charge to reproduce this intriguing effect in simulations, allowing for a detailed investigation and a deeper understanding of the underlying dynamics. We show that the nonreciprocity of the particle interaction, owing to the wake charges, is responsible for a broken symmetry of the channel that enables a persistent self-propelled motion of the extra particle. We find good agreement of the terminal extra-particle velocity with our theoretical considerations and with experiments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Wake-mediated propulsion of an upstream particle in two-dimensional plasma crystals
I. Laut
Institut für Materialphysik im Weltraum, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), 82234 Weßling, Germany
C. Räth
Institut für Materialphysik im Weltraum, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), 82234 Weßling, Germany
S. K. Zhdanov
Institut für Materialphysik im Weltraum, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), 82234 Weßling, Germany
V. Nosenko
Institut für Materialphysik im Weltraum, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), 82234 Weßling, Germany
G. E. Morfill
Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, 85741 Garching, Germany
BMSTU Centre for Plasma Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia
H. M. Thomas
Institut für Materialphysik im Weltraum, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), 82234 Weßling, Germany
Abstract
The wake-mediated propulsion of an “extra” particle in a channel of two neighboring rows of a two-dimensional plasma crystal, observed experimentally by Du et al. [Phys. Rev. E 89, 021101(R) (2014)], is explained in simulations and theory. We use the simple model of a pointlike ion wake charge to reproduce this intriguing effect in simulations, allowing for a detailed investigation and a deeper understanding of the underlying dynamics. We show that the nonreciprocity of the particle interaction, owing to the wake charges, is responsible for a broken symmetry of the channel that enables a persistent self-propelled motion of the extra particle. We find good agreement of the terminal extra-particle velocity with our theoretical considerations and with experiments.
pacs:
52.27.Lw 89.75.Kd
††preprint: APS/123-QED
Introduction. In ion beam physics, channeling effects can strongly influence the motion of ions or other charged particles in a crystalline solid Gemmell (1974); Feldman et al. (2012). Similarly, neutral atoms can be channeled in a standing wave of laser light Salomon et al. (1987); Keller et al. (1999). In complex plasma crystals, experimental observations of the channeling effect showed that instead of slowing down, an extra particle accelerates in the channel Du et al. (2012, 2014); Zhdanov et al. (2016). This persistent motion was attributed to the nonreciprocity of the particle interactions but the exact origin of the propulsion was not resolved Du et al. (2012). (Self-)propelled motion currently receives considerable attention both in macroscopic Deseigne et al. (2010) and microscopic Schaller et al. (2010); Buttinoni et al. (2013) systems.
Complex plasmas consist of micron-sized particles that are immersed in a weakly ionized gas. In a laboratory radio-frequency (rf) plasma, the particles are usually negatively charged and levitate in the plasma sheath region above the lower electrode where the gravitational force is balanced by the electric field. Thus confined, these strongly coupled systems can form two-dimensional (2D) crystalline structures which are called plasma crystals Chu and I (1994); *thomas1994; *hayashi1994; Morfill and Ivlev (2009). Large three-dimensional crystals can only be obtained under microgravity conditions, for example during parabolic flights Piel et al. (2006) or onboard the International Space Station Thomas et al. (2008). Both two- and three-dimensional plasma crystals are ideal model systems for phase transitions Schweigert et al. (1998); Killer et al. (2016), wave processes Nunomura et al. (2005); Tsai et al. (2016) and self-organization Menzel et al. (2010); Williams (2014), as their dynamics can be resolved at the level of individual particles.
The sheath electric field not only levitates the crystal, but also causes an ion flow that strongly influences the particle interaction. In the bulk plasma, far away from the rf electrodes, the particle interaction is well described by a screened Coulomb (Yukawa) potential since the charged particles are surrounded by a cloud of positively charged ions Ikezi (1986). In the sheath region, however, the downward-flowing ions distort the screening cloud, leading to a positive excess charge below each particle. This ion wake adds an attractive component to the mutual particle interactions Melzer et al. (1999) and makes them nonreciprocal. Ion wakes cause interesting effects like the formation of particle strings in a vertically extended system Kong et al. (2011), the mode-coupling instability in a monolayer Couëdel et al. (2011) and the coexistence of two distinct kinetic temperatures in a binary mixture Ivlev et al. (2015). A common way to model the ion wake is by a positive pointlike charge that is positioned a fixed distance below each particle. The intuitive picture of a pointlike wake charge allows for the rigorous analysis of the mode-coupling instability Ivlev and Morfill (2000) and of the slightly bowl-like shape Röcker et al. (2014a) of plasma crystal monolayers.
It was suggested that the ion wake be also responsible for the channeling effect in plasma crystals that was first observed in experiments by Du et al. Du et al. (2012), but the exact driving mechanism was not known. An “extra” particle floated slightly above the plasma crystal (upstream with respect to the ion flow) and followed the channel formed by lines of neighboring particles. Despite ambient gas friction, the particle moved at a nearly constant velocity, provoking lateral waves and an increase of kinetic temperature in the crystal Du et al. (2012, 2014).
In this Letter, we reproduce in simulations the wake-mediated propulsion of an upstream extra particle in a 2D plasma crystal. We use the simple model of a pointlike ion wake charge which enables an intuitive picture and an analytical analysis of the underlying dynamics. The attraction between the extra-particle wake and the particles in the crystal results in a symmetry-breaking deformation of the channel which accelerates the extra particle. We study the terminal velocity reached by the propulsion process and compare it to our theoretical considerations and to experiments.
Simulation particulars. Molecular-dynamics (md) simulations are well suited for modeling the dynamical effects in complex plasmas Totsuji et al. (2001); Ivlev et al. (2003); Sheridan (2008); Laut et al. (2016). In the simulation of a 2D plasma crystal in the horizontal plane, the equation of motion for particle reads:
[TABLE]
where is the three-dimensional particle position, the mass and the damping rate. The forces acting on the particle are the mutual particle interactions , the confinement force derived from an external potential, and a Langevin heat bath .
To include the ion wake in the mutual particle interaction, a positive pointlike charge is placed a fixed vertical distance below each particle, while the particle itself is modeled as a negative pointlike charge . The force exerted by particle (and its wake) on particle is thus modeled as
[TABLE]
where , the screening length, and . Here and in the following, denotes the magnitude of vector , and are the unit vectors of the coordinate system.
The confinement force reads , where is the horizontal confinement and the vertical confinement. Very regular crystals with few defects are obtained with a horizontal tenth-order potential , where is the horizontal position of particle and is approximately the radius of a crystal with the same number of particles in a parabolic horizontal confinement with frequency Durniak et al. (2010). The parabolic horizontal potential leads to a crystal where the interparticle distance increases with the distance from the crystal center Totsuji et al. (2001); Ivlev et al. (2003); Laut et al. (2016). While the global structure of a plasma crystal is well described by a parabolic confinement Zhdanov et al. (2003), the tenth-order potential is well suited to reproduce the regular central region.
The vertical confinement of the particles stems from the interplay of the gravitational force and the electrostatic forces of the sheath field which are oriented in opposite directions. This strong confinement is often modeled as a parabolic confinement , where the equilibrium position is Totsuji et al. (2001); Ivlev et al. (2003); Röcker et al. (2014b). In order to reproduce an upstream particle in simulations, we used a different equilibrium position for the extra particle than for the other particles that were confined at .
The Langevin force is defined by and , where is the temperature of the heat bath, the delta function and the Kronecker delta.
In a simulation run, particles are initially equilibrated. The and axes are oriented so that there is a line of nearest neighbors (and a channel) in the direction, see Fig. 1(c). Then, at , the extra particle is added to the crystal with an initial velocity in the direction. The simulation is stopped before the extra particle reaches the boundary of the crystal.
The simulated crystal consisted of particles, the particle mass kg, charge and screening length m was in the parameter range of the experimental observations of Refs. Du et al. (2012, 2014). If not stated otherwise, the friction coefficient was s*-1*, corresponding to a typical gas pressure of 1.0 Pa Liu et al. (2003). The wake charge and distance are not known in experiments—in theory and simulations they are assumed to be a fraction of the particle charge and of the screening length, respectively Ivlev and Morfill (2000); Röcker et al. (2014b); Laut et al. (2016). Here, and was used. The parameters of the confinement were , , and mm.
Channeling effect. The horizontal trajectory of the extra particle between and can be seen in Fig. 1(c). The extra particle was added to the crystal at the position with an initial velocity . The particles were confined by the tenth-order potential and formed a very regular lattice with an interparticle distance of . It can be seen that the particles forming the channel (the channel particles in the following) move towards the extra particle shortly after its passage. They subsequently perform a circular motion. Although a friction force is applied to the extra particle, it moves in a straight line at a constant velocity. The horizontal trajectories agree well with the experimental data shown in Fig. 1(e). In Fig. 1(d), it can be seen that the channel particles oscillate also in the vertical direction, while the extra particle moves at an almost constant height.
To visualize the deformation of the channel, the horizontal particle positions with respect to the extra particle, , are shown in Fig. 1(b). It can be seen that behind the extra particle the channel is clearly deformed, breaking the forward-backward symmetry of the channel geometry. The channel is shaped as a cone in the vicinity of the extra particle. In a range , the deformed channel is fitted to straight lines which have angles of and measured from the axis.
The sketch shown in Fig. 1(a) gives a first idea of the propulsion mechanism: During the passage of the extra particle floating above the crystal, the channel particles are attracted to the wake charge of the extra particle and thus deform the channel. Due to this symmetry-breaking deformation, the repulsion between the channel particles and the extra particle is stronger behind the extra particle than in front of it, leading to a net propelling force acting on the extra particle.
The density variations in the crystal caused by the extra particle are shown in Fig. 2. The density in the reference frame of the extra particle was averaged over times . Pronounced subsonic lateral wakes behind the extra particle can be clearly seen. They form due to the dispersion of waves that are excited by the extra particle and propagate in the crystal Dubin (2000). The structure of the density variations is very similar to the experimental observation in Ref. Du et al. (2012). Just behind the extra particle, in a region and , the density is substantially increased. Similar lateral wakes have been produced in experiment and simulation by sweeping an external perturbation through the crystal Nosenko et al. (2003).
The extra-particle energy balance is depicted in Fig. 3(a). The potential energy of the particle, given by the mutual particle interactions of Eq. (2) and the confinement , does hardly change, it is only modulated by a slight vertical oscillation of the particle. The kinetic energy of the particle increases linearly in the first second of the channeling process, before saturating at an almost constant value.
In a different simulation, the crystal was confined by the parabolic horizontal confinement . The extra particle was initially positioned near the center of the crystal with . The extra particle was confined in the channel which was slightly bent (see also Supplemental Material 111See Supplemental Material at URL for a movie of an extra particle in a crystal with parabolic confinement.). The energy balance is shown in Fig. 3(b). As the extra particle advances, it accumulates potential energy due to the parabolic confinement, but the propulsion effect is strong enough to accelerate the particle. Only near the boundary of the crystal the velocity decreases as the confinement well becomes steeper.
Model for accelerated extra-particle motion. In Fig. 4, the velocity of the extra particle in a tenth-order horizontal confinement is shown as a function of time for five simulations with different initial velocities in the interval containing the longitudinal and transverse sound speeds mm/s and mm/s. In the cases where , the extra particle is confined in the channel and its velocity saturates at where the propulsion effect is counterbalanced by friction. Note that is also reached from above for particles with . In the simulation with (bold line in Fig. 4), the channel particles are displaced such that the repelling force exerted on the extra particle has a larger component, leading to a less effective propulsion in direction. It also leads to a larger scattering angle in the channel, and as the extra particle accumulates enough kinetic energy it leaves the channel at . Upon exiting the channel, the extra particle is greatly accelerated such that it obtains a velocity .
Below we establish a simple model for the propulsion mechanism in the channel. To estimate the small displacement of the channel particle, we assume the attraction to the wake of the extra particle to be constant in the range and evaluate it at , i.e., when the particle distance in direction is half an interparticle distance [as sketched in Fig. 1(a)]. This yields , where is the channel width. The net propelling force—stemming from the asymmetry of the repulsive particle interactions before and after the passage—can then be estimated as , where and . For small we obtain , and equating with the friction force, the terminal extra-particle velocity can be estimated as
[TABLE]
where depends rather weakly on . For the simulation parameters, slightly overestimates the terminal extra-particle velocity. One reason for the discrepancy is that the particle-particle repulsion was not considered when estimating the wake-mediated displacement . A comparison of and for different values of friction rate in the range can be seen in the inset of Fig. 4. The model always slightly overestimates the extra-particle velocity, but the predicted scaling is in good agreement with simulations.
Discussion. It is expected that the extra particle floats above the crystal because it has a slightly smaller mass than the other particles Zhdanov et al. (2015). Varying the mass (and charge) of the extra particle may yield further conclusions regarding the mass ratios in experiments. In order to fully understand the origin of the extra particles floating above or below the crystal layer, a more realistic particle confinement is needed that explicitly considers the balance of electric and gravitational forces in the vertical direction. The ion wake of the extra particle will be dynamically distorted when it is very close to a channel particle. The point-like model may thus not be applicable in narrow channels (when is very small) or during head-on collisions with a channel particle.
In Ref. Schweigert et al. (2002), a particle-in-cell simulation was used to model the particle interactions in a crystal with an extra particle below the crystal plane. The propelled motion of this downstream particle was reproduced in md simulations, but no intuitive picture was given for the mechanism. Here, with the aid of the pointlike wake charge model, this intuitive explanation was given for the persistent motion of an upstream particle. The propulsion mechanism based on the nonreciprocal particle interactions controls the terminal extra-particle velocity and enables the study of self-propelled motion in complex plasmas Bechinger et al. (2016).
Reproducing the channeling effect in simulations also enables the study of the wave processes that are discussed in the Supplemental Material 222See Supplemental Material at URL, which includes Refs. Donkó et al. (2008); Couëdel et al. (2009); Nunomura et al. (2003); Couëdel et al. (2010, 2016), for a detailed analysis of the wave processes..
Equation 3 closely reproduces the extra-particle velocity measured in experiments. Assuming the wake parameters to be and as in our simulations, we obtain , and for experiments 1, 3 and 5 of Ref. Du et al. (2012), respectively (see Table 1 in Ref. Du et al. (2012)). Again, the predicted velocity is slightly above the observed value. In simulations, channeling was observed if the initial velocity was above the transverse sound speed .
To conclude, we reproduced in md simulations the propulsion of an extra particle in a 2D plasma crystal with the intuitive model of a pointlike ion wake charge. The nonreciprocal particle interactions, owing to the ion wake, lead to an asymmetric deformation of the channel and a net propelling force. The terminal velocity reached by the extra particle agrees well with our theoretical considerations and with experiments.
Acknowledgements.
Acknowledgments. We thank Cheng-Ran Du for providing the experimental data. This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economy and Technology under grant No. 50WM1441. GEM wishes to acknowledge support from RSF Grant No. 14-43-00053.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Gemmell (1974) D. S. Gemmell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46 , 129 (1974) . · doi ↗
- 2Feldman et al. (2012) L. C. Feldman, J. W. Mayer, and S. T. A. Picraux, Materials analysis by ion channeling: submicron crystallography (Academic Press, 2012).
- 3Salomon et al. (1987) C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, H. Metcalf, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 , 1659 (1987) . · doi ↗
- 4Keller et al. (1999) C. Keller, J. Schmiedmayer, A. Zeilinger, T. Nonn, S. Dürr, and G. Rempe, Appl. Phys. B 69 , 303 (1999) . · doi ↗
- 5Du et al. (2012) C.-R. Du, V. Nosenko, S. Zhdanov, H. M. Thomas, and G. E. Morfill, Europhys. Lett. 99 , 55001 (2012) . · doi ↗
- 6Du et al. (2014) C.-R. Du, V. Nosenko, S. Zhdanov, H. M. Thomas, and G. E. Morfill, Phys. Rev. E 89 , 021101(R) (2014) . · doi ↗
- 7Zhdanov et al. (2016) S. Zhdanov, C.-R. Du, M. Schwabe, V. Nosenko, H. M. Thomas, and G. E. Morfill, Europhys. Lett. 114 , 55002 (2016) . · doi ↗
- 8Deseigne et al. (2010) J. Deseigne, O. Dauchot, and H. Chaté, Phys. Rev. Lett 105 , 098001 (2010) . · doi ↗
