A Comparison Study of Two High Accuracy Numerical Methods for a Parabolic System in Air Pollution Modelling
Ivan Dimov, Juri Kandilarov, Venelin Todorov, Lubin Vulkov

TL;DR
This paper compares two high-accuracy numerical methods, the compact difference scheme and Richardson extrapolation, for solving a system of parabolic PDEs in air pollution modeling, highlighting their accuracy and computational efficiency.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of two advanced numerical schemes and introduces a sixth-order approximation for improved accuracy in air pollution PDE models.
Findings
The fourth order compact difference scheme offers high accuracy with moderate complexity.
Richardson extrapolation enhances the accuracy of second order schemes effectively.
The sixth-order approximation further improves solution precision in the tested models.
Abstract
We present two approaches for enhancing the accuracy of second order finite difference approximations of two-dimensional semilinear parabolic systems. These are the fourth order compact difference scheme and the fourth order scheme based on Richardson extrapolation. Our interest is concentrated on a system of ten parabolic partial differential equations in air pollution modeling. We analyze numerical experiments to compare the two approaches with respect to accuracy, computational complexity, non-negativity preserving and etc. Sixth-order approximation based on the fourth-order compact difference scheme combined with Richardson extrapolation is also discussed numerically.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiative Heat Transfer Studies · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
