Inequalities for the modified Bessel function of the second kind and the kernel of the Kr\"{a}tzel integral transformation
Robert E. Gaunt

TL;DR
This paper derives new inequalities for the modified Bessel function of the second kind by establishing bounds for the kernel of the Krätzel integral transformation, connecting special functions and integral transforms.
Contribution
It introduces novel inequalities for $K_ u$ based on the Krätzel kernel, expanding the understanding of these functions and their bounds.
Findings
New inequalities for $K_ u$ in terms of gamma functions
Bounds derived for the Krätzel integral transformation kernel
Special cases recover known inequalities
Abstract
We obtain new inequalities for the modified Bessel function of the second kind in terms of the gamma function. These bounds follow as special cases of inequalities that we derive for the kernel of the Kr\"{a}tzel integral transformation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Inequalities and Applications · Mathematical functions and polynomials · Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Inequalities for the modified Bessel function of the second kind and the kernel of the Krätzel integral transformation
Robert E. Gaunt111School of Mathematics, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
(January 2017)
Abstract
We obtain new inequalities for the modified Bessel function of the second kind in terms of the gamma function. These bounds follow as special cases of inequalities that we derive for the kernel of the Krätzel integral transformation.
Keywords: Modified Bessel function, Krätzel integral transformation, inequality
AMS 2010 Subject Classification: Primary 33C10
1 Introduction
The modified Bessel function of the second kind is an important and widely used special function. There exists a substantial literature concerning inequalities for the modified Bessel function of the second; see, for example, [7] and [1] and references therein. In a recent work, [3] derived the following simple lower bound for the function :
[TABLE]
In this note, we generalise this inequality to the modified Bessel function for . In deriving our inequality, we follow the approach of [3] by exploiting the following integral representation of the modified Bessel function of the second kind ([8], formula 10.32.8):
[TABLE]
This integral representation of the modified Bessel function closely resembles the kernel
[TABLE]
of the Krätzel integral transformation [6] (see also [2] and references therein for further properties) defined by
[TABLE]
Indeed, a simple manipulation yields the relation
[TABLE]
Due to the similarity between the representations (1.2) and (1.3), our approach to bounding the kernel is no more difficult than bounding the modified Bessel function . In this note, we exploit the representation (1.3) to derive inequalities for the kernel and then use (1.4) to immediately deduce inequalities for the modified Bessel function . These inequalities are a natural generalisation of the inequality (1.1).
2 Results and proofs
The following is the main result of this note.
Theorem 2.1**.**
(i). Let . Then, for , , we have
[TABLE]
with equality if and only if . If , the strict inequality is reversed and holds for all .
(ii). Let . Then, for , we have
[TABLE]
with equality if and only if . If , the strict inequality is reversed and holds for all .
Proof.
We first note that part (ii) follows immediately from setting in part (i), due to the relation (1.4). In order to establish part (i), we recall the integral representation of the kernel :
[TABLE]
Setting gives
[TABLE]
We now suppose that and prove that under this condition inequality (2.5) is strict. For , we have
[TABLE]
Applying this inequality to (2.7) yields
[TABLE]
Making the change of variables gives
[TABLE]
where is the beta function, and we used the standard formula . This completes the proof that inequality (2.5) holds for . When inequality (2.8) is reversed and so inequality (2.5) is also reversed. Note that when the integral in inequality (2.8) only exists if . Finally, we note that we have equality when , because (2.8) becomes an equality in this case. ∎
Corollary 2.2**.**
Let . Then for all ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The upper bound holds because for all (see [5]). The lower bound follows from Theorem 2.1 and an application of the inequality for (see [4]). ∎
Remark 2.3**.**
The following bounds for were obtained by [7]:
[TABLE]
Despite taking a relatively simple form, numerical experiments show that, for , the bounds of [7] and Theorem 2.1, part (ii) are remarkably accurate for all but very small , for which the modified Bessel function has a singularity as . The bound (2.6) outperforms the lower bound of [7] for very small , as it is as , as opposed to which is the case for that bound of [7]. However, the bound of [7] performs better for large .
Acknowledgements
The author is supported by a Dame Kathleen Ollerenshaw Research Fellowship.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Baricz, Á. Bounds for modified Bessel functions of the first and second kinds, P. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 𝟓𝟑 53 \mathbf{53} (2010), pp. 575–599.
- 2[2] Barrios, J.A. and Betancor, J.J. The Krätzel integral transformation of distributions. Math Nachr. 𝟏𝟓𝟒 154 \mathbf{154} (1991), pp. 11–26.
- 3[3] Gaunt, R.E. Inequalities for modified Bessel functions and their integrals. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 𝟒𝟐𝟎 420 \mathbf{420} (2014), pp. 373-386.
- 4[4] Gautschi, W. Some elementary inequalities relating to the gamma and incomplete gamma function. J. Math. Phys. 𝟑𝟖 38 \mathbf{38} (1959), pp. 77–81.
- 5[5] Ifantis, E.K. and Siafarikas, P.D. Inequalities involving Bessel and modified Bessel functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 𝟏𝟒𝟕 147 \mathbf{147} (1990), pp. 214 -227.
- 6[6] Krätzel, E. Eine Verallgemeinerung der Laplace und Meijer transformation. Wiss. Z. Univ. Jena. Math. Naturw. Reihe. 𝟓 5 \mathbf{5} (1965), pp. 369–381.
- 7[7] Luke, Y.L. Inequalities for generalized hypergeometric functions. J. Approx. Theory 𝟓 5 \mathbf{5} (1972), pp. 41–65.
- 8[8] Olver, F.W.J., Lozier, D.W., Boisvert, R.F. and Clark, C.W. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions . Cambridge University Press, 2010.
