On closed Lie ideals of certain tensor products of $C^*$-algebras
Ranjana Jain, Ved Prakash Gupta

TL;DR
This paper characterizes closed Lie ideals and product ideals in tensor products of simple $C^*$-algebras under various norms, revealing their structure and conditions for their identification.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive description of closed Lie ideals in tensor products of simple $C^*$-algebras with specific norms, extending previous results and identifying conditions for product ideals.
Findings
Closed ideals of $A ensor^{ ext{min}} B$ are product ideals if $A$ is exact or $B$ is nuclear.
All closed Lie ideals of $A ensor^{ ext{alpha}} B$ are identified for certain norms and algebra conditions.
Every non-central closed Lie ideal of $B(H) ensor^{ ext{alpha}} B(H)$ contains the product ideal $K(H) ensor^{ ext{alpha}} K(H)$.
Abstract
For a simple -algebra and any other -algebra , it is proved that every closed ideal of is a product ideal if either is exact or is nuclear. Closed commutator of a closed ideal in a Banach algebra whose every closed ideal possesses a quasi-central approximate identity is described in terms of the commutator of the Banach algebra. If is either the Haagerup norm, the operator space projective norm or the -minimal norm, then this allows us to identify all closed Lie ideals of , where and are simple, unital -algebras with one of them admitting no tracial functionals, and to deduce that every non-central closed Lie ideal of contains the product ideal . Closed Lie ideals of are also determined, being any simple…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
On closed Lie ideals of certain tensor products of
-algebras
Ved Prakash Gupta
School of Physical Sciences,
Jawaharlal Nehru University
New Delhi-110067, INDIA.
and
Ranjana Jain
Department of Mathematics
University of Delhi
Delhi-110007, INDIA.
Abstract.
For a simple -algebra and any other -algebra , it is proved that every closed ideal of is a product ideal if either is exact or is nuclear. Closed commutator of a closed ideal in a Banach algebra whose every closed ideal possesses a quasi-central approximate identity is described in terms of the commutator of the Banach algebra. If is either the Haagerup norm, the operator space projective norm or the -minimal norm, then this allows us to identify all closed Lie ideals of , where and are simple, unital -algebras with one of them admitting no tracial functionals, and to deduce that every non-central closed Lie ideal of contains the product ideal . Closed Lie ideals of are also determined, being any simple unital -algebra with at most one tracial state and any compact Hausdorff space. And, it is shown that closed Lie ideals of are precisely the product ideals, where is any unital -algebra and any completely positive uniform tensor norm.
Key words and phrases:
-algebras, commutators, ideals, Lie ideals, tensor products, quasi-cental approximate identity.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
46L06
The first named author was supported partially by a UPE II project (with Id 228) of Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi and the second named author was supported by individual R D grants 2014-15 and 2015-16 of University of Delhi, Delhi.
1. Introduction
A complex associative algebra inherits a canonical Lie algebra structure given by the bracket and a subspace of is said to be a Lie ideal if for all and .
Analysis of ideal structures of various tensor products of operator algebras has been an important project and a good deal of work has been done in this direction - see, for instance, [3, 10, 14, 15, 12, 16, 24]. On the other hand, there also exists an extensive literature devoted towards the study of Lie ideals, directly as well as through ideals of the algebra, in pure as well as Banach and operator algebras - see [6, 9, 17, 18, 19, 20] and the references therein.
The analysis of closed Lie ideals in operator algebras is primarily motivated by the evident relationship between commutators, projections and closed Lie ideals in -algebras. For instance, Pedersen ([21, Lemma 1]) showed that the closed subspace and the -subalgebra generated by the set of projections of a -algebra are both closed Lie ideals of ; and, moreover, if is simple with a non-trivial projection and if has at most one tracial state then , i.e., the span of the projections is dense in ([21, Corollary 4]).
However, unlike the ideals of tensor products of operator algebras, not much is known about the closed Lie ideals of various tensor products of operator algebras. Among the few known results in this direction, Marcoux [17], in 1995, proved that for a UHF -algebra , a subspace of is a closed Lie ideal if and only if
[TABLE]
for some closed ideal and some closed subspace in , where with respect to the unique faithful tracial state on . Then, in 2008, relying heavily on the Lie ideal structure of tensor products of pure algebras, Brešar et al., in [6], proved that for a unital Banach algebra , the closed Lie ideals of , of the Banach space projective tensor product and of the Banach space injective tensor product (if it is a Banach algebra) are precisely the closed ideals.
In this article, we focus on analyzing the (closed) ideal and Lie ideal structures of certain tensor products of -algebras. Here is a quick overview of the structure of this paper.
In Section 2, we generalize a characterization (of [9, 17]) for closed Lie ideals via invariance under unitaries in a simple unital -algebra containing non-trivial projections and admitting at most one tracial state. Then, in Section 3, following the footsteps of [3, 15], for a simple -algebra and any -algebra we discuss the ideal structure of when is exact or is nuclear.
Section 4 is the key part of this article. Starting with the analysis of closed commutators of closed ideals, we move on to obtain a generalization (see 4.7) of a characterization of closed Lie ideals in -algebras given by Brešar et al. [6] to Banach algebras in which sufficiently many closed ideals possess quasi-central approximate identities. Using these, when is either the Haagerup norm, the operator space projective norm or the -minimal norm, we identify all closed Lie ideals of , where and are simple, unital -algebras with one of them admitting no tracial functionals, and, deduce that has only one non-zero central Lie ideal, namely, , whereas every non-central closed Lie ideal contains the product ideal .
In Section 5, we basically show that the techniques of Marcoux and Brešar et al. can be applied to obtain an analogy to Marcoux’s result ([17]) that determines the structure of Lie ideals of , where is any simple unital -algebra with at most one tracial state and is any compact Hausdorff space. And, finally, in Section 6, applying a deep result of Brešar et al. [6], we deduce that closed Lie ideals of are precisely the product ideals, where is a unital -algebra and a completely positive uniform tensor norm.
2. Closed Lie ideals of simple unital -algebras
In order to maintain distinction between algebraic and topological simplicity, we shall say that a Banach algebra is topologically simple if it does not contain any non-trivial closed two sided ideal in it. However, since maximal ideals are closed and every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal in a unital Banach algebra, it is easily seen that the two notions are same for unital Banach algebras.
Recall that, a tracial state on a -algebra is a positive linear functional of norm one satisfying for all . If is unital, then a tracial state is unital, i.e., . The collection of tracial states on is denoted by .
Note that, for each , is clearly a closed Lie ideal in of co-dimension and contains the closed commutator Lie ideal . In particular, if , then is also a closed Lie ideal in and contains . Cuntz and Pederson ([7]) proved that they are, in fact, equal.
Theorem 2.1**.**
([7, Theorem 2.9], [22, Theorem 1]) Let be a -algebra. Then, the following hold:
- (1)
* = \left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}sl(A)&\mathit{if}\ \mathcal{T}(A)\neq\emptyset,\ \mathit{and}\\ A&\mathit{if}\ \mathcal{T}(A)=\emptyset.\end{array}\right.* 2. (2)
If is unital and , then .
It turns out that is the only non-trivial closed Lie ideal for a large class of -algebras. The following identifications of Lie ideals were made in [19, Theorem 2.5] and [6, Proposition 5.23], and we will require this list in our discussions ahead.
Proposition 2.2**.**
([19, 6]) Let be a simple unital -algebra.
- (1)
If has no tracial states, then the only Lie ideals of are , and . 2. (2)
If has a unique tracial state, then the only closed Lie ideals of are , , and .
Corollary 2.3**.**
If is a -factor or an -factor, then the only (uniformly) closed Lie ideals of are , , and .
Proof.
A -factor or an -factor is algebraically simple because it is a simple unital -algebra - see [4, III.1.7.11]. Moreover, it has a unique tracial state - see [4, III.2.5.7]. ∎
Fong, Miers and Sourour ([9, Theorem 1]) and Marcoux ([17, Theorem 2.12]) characterized closed Lie ideals of and of a UHF -algebra, respectively, through invariance under unitary conjugation. Note that admits no tracial states and a UHF -algebra admits a unique tracial state and both are spanned by their projections ([18], [19, Theorem 4.6]). Imitating the original proofs, we obtain the following generalization of above characterization.
Proposition 2.4**.**
Let be a simple unital -algebra with at most one tracial state and suppose it contains a non-trivial projection. Let be a closed subspace of . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
* is a Lie ideal.* 2. (2)
* for all invertible elements in .* 3. (3)
* for all unitaries in .*
Proof.
By 2.2, is a straight forward verification on the possible list of closed Lie ideals. The implication is obvious.
In order to show , note that for every projection , is a unitary and for ,
[TABLE]
Then, since is a simple unital -algebra with either no tracial states or a unique tracial state and contains a non-trivial projection, the projections span a dense subspace of ([21, Corollary 7]), and we are done. ∎
We now show that the analogue of 2.4 does not hold in Banach algebras. Recall (from [6]) that a tracial functional on a Banach algebra is a non-zero continuous linear functional satisfying for all . The collection of tracial functionals on is denoted by . By Hahn-Banach Theorem, we easily see that if and only if .
In a unital Banach algebra , the set of its unitaries is defined as . If is a unital -algebra, then clearly and for , considering for some Hilbert space , we see that for all , so that is an isometry. In particular, it follows that for a unital -algebra , both definitions give the same set, i.e.,
Remark 2.5*.*
For any two unital -algebras and , it is known ([13, Corollary 2]) that , where is the Haagerup tensor product (see [8]). By a result of Fack (see [18, Theorem 2.16]), the Cuntz algebra is spanned by its commutators and, therefore, it has no tracial functionals. Further, since is cross norm (see [8]), is an isometric homomorphism, so the Banach algebra does not have any tracial functionals, as well. Also, since is a simple -algebra, is a topologically simple Banach algebra, by [3, Theorem 5.1]. By above decomposition of unitaries, is invariant under conjugation by unitaries in but it is easily seen that it is not a Lie-ideal.
On similar lines, for any infinite dimensional Hilbert space , it can also be seen that is invariant under conjugation by unitaries in but is not a Lie ideal. These observations also illustrate that tensor product of two Lie ideals need not be a Lie ideal.
Remark 2.6*.*
Unlike the above decomposition of unitaries in the Banach algebra , the unitaries in the -algebra do not decompose as elementary tensors. Indeed, since is a simple (see [24]), unital -algebra and has no tracial states, by [6, Proposition 5.23] or 4.16 below, its only closed Lie ideals are , and itself. Since contains non-trivial projections, so does ; therefore, by 2.4, is not invariant under conjugation by unitaries. In particular, not every unitary in can be expressed as an elementary tensor for unitaries and in .
3. Closed Ideals of
Let and be -algebras and suppose is topologically simple. If is either the Haagerup tensor product or the operator space projective tensor product, then by [3, Proposition 5.2], and by [15, Theorem 3.8], it is known that every closed ideal of the Banach algebra is a product ideal of the form for some closed ideal in .
In general, not much is known about the ideal structure of the -minimal tensor product. However, the (Zorn’s Lemma) technique used in above ideal structures can be applied to analyze the ideals of under some additional hypothesis, which we demonstrate below.
Theorem 3.1**.**
Let and be -algebras where is topologically simple. If either is exact or is nuclear, then every closed ideal of the -algebra is a product ideal of the form for some closed ideal in .
Proof.
Let be a non-zero closed ideal in . Consider the collection
[TABLE]
By [3, Proposition 4.5], contains a non-zero elementary tensor, say, . If and are the non-zero closed ideals in and generated by and , respectively, then by simplicity of , we have and . In particular, .
Note that, by injectivity of and the fact that a finite sum of closed ideals is closed in a -algebra, it is easily seen that for any finite collection of closed ideals in . So, with respect to the partial order given by set inclusion, every chain in has an upper bound, namely, the closure of the ideal in , implying thereby that there exists a maximal element, say , in .
We will show that . Consider the map . If is exact, then by definition of exactness, its kernel is ; and, if is nuclear, then so are and and it is known (see [4, 10]) that the sequence
[TABLE]
is always exact and, therefore, we obtain
[TABLE]
Since is a surjective -homomorphism, is a closed ideal in . It is now sufficient to show that this is the zero ideal. If , then, again by [3, Proposition 4.5], contains a non-zero elementary tensor, say, . Let be the closed ideal in generated by . Since is simple, it equals the closed ideal generated by and we obtain , a contradiction to the maximality of as is not contained in . ∎
4. Ideals with quasi-central approximate identities and their closed commutators
We first recall some definitions and notations from [17, 6]. Every subspace of , the center of an associative algebra , is clearly a Lie ideal in and is called a central Lie ideal. For subspaces and of ,
[TABLE]
If and are Lie ideals in then so is . For a subspace of , consider the subspace
[TABLE]
If is a Lie ideal then is a subalgebra as well as a Lie ideal of ([6, Proposition 2.2]). Note that if is an ideal in , then any subspace of embraced by , i.e., satisfying , is a Lie ideal in . In fact, Brešar et al. [6, ] showed that a closed subspace of a -algebra is a Lie ideal if and only if it is topologically embraced by a closed ideal in , i.e.,
[TABLE]
We show below (see 4.7) that this characterization generalizes to Banach algebras whose every closed ideal possesses a quasi-central approximate identity. Examples of such Banach algebras (which are not -algebras) will be illustrated in Section 4.1.
For a closed ideal in a -algebra , it is known ([20, Lemma 1] and [6, Proposition 5.25]) that
[TABLE]
Miers (in [20]) mentions that the third equality was due to Bunce and gives a proof using quasi-central approximate identity, and the other two equalities were proved by Brešar et al. using techniques of von Neumann algebras. We generalize this result to ideals in Banach algebras with quasi-central approximate identities. The proof given here borrows ideas from [20, 23] and does not involve von Neumann algebra tools.
Definition 4.1*.*
[3] If is an ideal in a Banach algebra , then a net in is said to be a quasi-central approximate identity for in if
- (1)
, and 2. (2)
for all and .
It is known that all ideals (not necessarily closed) in -algebras possess quasi-central approximate identities ([1, Theorem 3.2] and [2, Theorem 1]).
The following equalities between commutators of ideals will be required ahead in a characterization of closed Lie ideals (see [20, Lemma 1], [6, Proposition 5.25] and [23, Lemma 1.4] for ideals in -algebras).
Lemma 4.2**.**
Let be a closed ideal in a Banach algebra . If admits a quasi-central approximate identity in , then
[TABLE]
In particular, and, if has no tracial functionals, then . Moreover, if the closed ideal also contains a quasi-central approximate identity, then .
Proof.
Let be a quasi-central approximate identity for the ideal in . Since is a closed ideal, clearly
[TABLE]
For the reverse inclusions, we first show that . Let and . Then, there exist , such that . Note that for all , and
[TABLE]
Thus, there exists an index such that implying that .
For the remaining equality, it suffices to show that is dense in . Let and . Then there exist , such that . Clearly, and, as above, it is easily seen that
[TABLE]
implying that is dense in .
Since , by definition, and if , then implying that and hence .
If has no tracial functionals, then and, therefore, .
Finally, suppose the closed ideal admits a quasi-central approximate identity, say, . Since , clearly . Let and . Then, , and
[TABLE]
implying that is dense in and hence . ∎
More generally, using a result by Robert [23], we shall show below that for any closed Lie ideal in an appropriate Banach algebra , which generalizes [6, Theorem 5.27]. Robert, in [23], has given a simpler proof of [6, Theorem 5.27] avoiding von Neumann algebra tools.
Recall that a Banach algebra is said to be semiprime if implies for any closed ideal . And a closed ideal in is said to be semiprime if the quotient Banach algebra is semiprime. A -algebra and all its closed ideals are easily seen to be semiprime.
Lemma 4.3**.**
Let be a Banach algebra whose every closed ideal possesses a left or a right approximate identity. Then is semiprime and so are its closed ideals.
Proof.
Let be a closed ideal in such that . Let and be a right approximate identity in . Then, for all and as , we get implying that . Thus, is semiprime.
Next, for a closed ideal in , every closed ideal in is of the form for some closed ideal in containing . If admits a left or a right approximate identity, so does . Therefore, every closed ideal in admits a left or a right approximate identity and, as above, is semiprime. ∎
We will need the following observation by Brěsar et al. [6, Proposition 5.2].
Proposition 4.4**.**
Let be a closed Lie ideal in a Banach algebra and denote the closed ideal generated by , i.e., . If the Banach algebra is semiprime or commutative, then .
The following mildly generalizes [6, Theorem 5.27] and a part of [23, Theorem 1.5].
Theorem 4.5**.**
Let be a closed Lie ideal in a Banach algebra and denote the closed ideal generated by , i.e., . If all closed ideals of containing possess quasi-central approximate identities, then and
[TABLE]
In particular, . Moreover, if has no tracial functionals, then , as well.
Proof.
By Lemma 4.3, is semiprime. So, by 4.4, implying that . It is elementary to see that (see [23, Lemma 1.4]), so that and, therefore, , where the last equality follows from the easily verifiable fact that (see [23, (1.1)]).
On the other hand, since , contains a quasi-central approximate identity and, , by Lemma 4.2.
The remaining then follows again from Lemma 4.2. ∎
Corollary 4.6**.**
Let be a Banach algebra whose every closed ideal contains a quasi-central approximate identity and suppose . Then every non-central closed Lie ideal of , i.e., , contains a non-zero closed ideal.
4.5 partially answers a question of Brešar et al. [6, page 120] where they ask for suitable conditions in Banach -algebra setting so that a closed Lie ideal is closed commutator equal to a closed ideal, and it also yields the following characterization of closed Lie ideals:
Corollary 4.7**.**
If every closed ideal in a Banach algebra admits a quasi-central approximate identity, then a closed subspace of is a Lie ideal if and only if there exists a closed ideal in such that
[TABLE]
The techniqe of Robert [23], based on a Theorem of Herstein [11], yields a stronger version of 4.5.
Theorem 4.8**.**
Let be a closed Lie ideal in a Banach algebra , denote the closed ideal generated by and denote the closed Lie ideal . If all closed ideals of containing possess quasi-central approximate identities, then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where denotes the Banach subalgebra of generated by .
Proof.
By Lemma 4.3, the quotient is semiprime. So, the proof of the equalities given by Robert in [23, Theorem 1.5 (i)] works verbatim.
Then, the inclusion is immediate. Since , contains a quasi-central approximate identity, so by Lemma 4.2, we have and, since , the reverse inclusion follows. ∎
By Lemma 4.2 and 2.1, 4.8 immediately yields the following:
Corollary 4.9**.**
Let be a Banach algebra whose every closed ideal admits a quasi-central approximate identity. Then, for any closed ideal in , we have
[TABLE]
In particular, if is a -algebra with no tracial states, then .
This yields the following generalization of [6, Corollary 5.26] and, using Lemma 4.2 and 4.9, the same proof works verbatim.
Corollary 4.10**.**
Let (resp., ) be a closed ideal (resp., Lie ideal) in a Banach algebra . If every closed ideal of possesses a quasi-central approximate identity, then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
. 3. (3)
**
4.1. Commutators of closed ideals in certain tensor products of -algebras
Apart from the usual spatial tensor product of -algebras, we will also be interested in some tensor products which yield Banach algebras which are not necessarily -algebras. As in [5, ], a norm on the algebraic tensor product of a pair of -algebras and is said to be
- (1)
a sub-cross norm if for all , , 2. (2)
an algebra norm if for all , and 3. (3)
a tensor norm if , where and are the Banach space injective and projective norms, respectively.
Clearly, , the completion of with respect to any algebra norm , is a Banach algebra. Since is a cross norm, every tensor norm is, therefore, sub-cross.
The tensor products that we will be concerned with here include the -minimal tensor product (), the (operator space) Haagerup tensor product (), the operator space projective tensor product () and the Banach space projective tensor product (). We refer the reader to [8, 10] for their definitions and essential properties. All these norms are sub-cross algebra tensor norms and yield Banach algebras. In fact, for any pair of -algebras, (by definition) and (by [12]) yield Banach -algebras whereas the natural involution is not isometric with respect to ([5]).
The following proposition is an immediate generalization of [3, Corollary 3.4] and yields examples of closed ideals with quasi-central approximate identities in Banach algebras which are not -algebras.
Proposition 4.11**.**
Let and be -algebras and be an algebra tensor norm. Let and be closed ideals in and , respectively. Then the closed ideal admits a quasi-central approximate identity in .
Proof.
By [3, Lemma 3.3], the closure of a finite sum of closed ideals containing quasi-central approximate identities in a Banach algebra also contains a quasi-central approximate identity. And since, , it is enough to show that an arbitrary product ideal , for ideals and in and , respectively, admits a quasi-central approximate identity in .
Let and be quasi-central approximate identities for and in and , respectively ([2, Theorem 1]), with and . The set inherits a directed structure via the partial ordering
[TABLE]
Let and for all , and set for all . Clearly, and are quasi-central approximate identities for and , respectively. We show that is a quasi-central approximate identiy for in . Since is a sub-cross norm, is uniformly bounded. Let and . Then,
[TABLE]
likewise, , and
[TABLE]
Since (resp., ) is dense in (resp., ), it follows that for all and . ∎
Remark 4.12*.*
Note that in the above theorem, we have actually proved that, if and are ideals (not necessarily closed) in -algebras and , then the (algebraic) product ideal admits a quasi-central approximate identity in .
We can now easily deduce the following:
Corollary 4.13**.**
Let and be -algebras and be an algebra tensor norm. Let and be closed ideals in and , respectively. Then,
[TABLE]
if is a closed ideal in of any of the following form:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
* and is either the Haagerup norm or the operator space projective norm.* 3. (3)
* is any closed ideal in , contains only finitely many closed ideals and is either the Haagerup norm or the operator space projective norm.* 4. (4)
* is any ideal in and is any -tensor norm.*
Proof.
- (1)
is immediate from 4.11 and Lemma 4.2. 2. (2)
: By [3, Theorem 3.8] and [14, Proposition 3.2], is a closed ideal in . 3. (3)
: By [3, Theorem 5.3] and [16, Theorem 3.4], every closed ideal in is a finite sum of product ideals. 4. (4)
follows from the fact that every ideal in a -algebra admits a quasi-central approximate identity ([1, 2]).
∎
Remark 4.14*.*
If a -algebra () contains only finitely many closed ideals, then for any -algebra (), or is a Banach algebra which is not a -alegbra ([5, Theorem 1]) and, as seen above, its every closed ideal possesses a quasi-central approximate identity.
Proposition 4.15**.**
Let and be -algebras and suppose is unital. Then, every non-central closed Lie ideal in contains a non-zero closed ideal in the following cases:
- (1)
* has no tracial states and is any -norm.* 2. (2)
* has no tracial functionals, contains only finitely many closed ideals and is either the Haagerup norm or the operator space projective norm.*
Proof.
- (1)
: Since is unital, for any -norm , as a -subalgebra, so does not have any tracial states and, therefore, the assertion holds by 4.5 and 4.9. 2. (2)
: Since is a cross norm (see [8]), is an isometric homomorphism; so, the Banach algebra admits no tracial functionals. The rest is then taken care of by 4.13(3) and 4.6.
∎
Theorem 4.16**.**
Let and be simple, unital -algebras and suppose one of them admits no tracial functionals. If is either the Haagerup norm, the operator space projective norm or the -minimal norm, then the only closed Lie ideals of are and itself.
Proof.
If is or , it is known ([3, Theorem 2.13] and [25, Corollary 1]) that . And, by [13, Theorem 3], the algebraic isomorphism extends to an algebraic isomorphism (not necessarily isometric) between and . So, in all three cases, we obtain . In particular, the only central Lie ideals of are and .
The -algebra is simple (see [24, Corollary IV.4.21]). And, by [3, Theorem 5.1] and [15, Theorem 3.7], the Banach algebras and are topologically simple. So, by 4.15, is its only non-central closed Lie ideal. ∎
We conclude this section with the following:
Theorem 4.17**.**
Let be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert space. If is either the Haagerup norm, the operator space projective norm or the -minimal norm, then the only non-zero central Lie ideal of is and every non-central closed Lie ideal of contains the product ideal .
Proof.
As in 4.16, we obtain .
Now, let be a non-central closed Lie ideal in . By a theorem of Halmos, every bounded operator on is a sum of two commutators, so does not admit any tracial functionals. Thus, must contain a non-zero closed ideal by 4.15. By [3, Proposition 4.5 and Corollary 4.6] and [15, Proposition 3.6], every non-zero closed ideal of contains an elementary tensor, say, . So, being the only non-trivial closed ideal in , must be contained in . In other words, is the unique minimal closed ideal which is contained in every non-zero closed ideal of . Therefore, in all cases, must contain the product ideal .
∎
5. Closed Lie ideals of
Let be a compact Hausdorff space and be a unital -algebra. It is well known ([10, 5]) that the canonical map extends to a unital -isomorphism. We will be using this fact and its consequences in the following observations.
We first recall, from [17], certain naturally arising closed ideals and closed Lie ideals of . Some of the proofs were not given in [17]. For the sake of completeness and convenience, we provide outlines of those proofs in bigger generality. The following folklore observation for a UHF -algebra was used in [17, Theorem 3.1]. We include the details for a more general situation.
Proposition 5.1**.**
Let be a compact Hausdorff space and be a topologically simple -algebra. Then every closed ideal in is of the form for some closed subset of .
Proof.
Let be a closed ideal in . From 3.1 and the well known fact that every closed ideal in is of the form for some closed subset of , corresponds to the ideal in . It is enough to show that where , which is clearly a closed ideal in .
Clearly . To obtain the equality we just need to show that is dense in . Let and . For each , consider the open ball and the punctured open ball . The collection is an open cover of . Fix a finite subcover, say, . Since is compact and Hausdorff, there exists a partition of unity such that for and . Then, for all , so that . Fix an . Then, for each , we have
[TABLE]
In particular, , implying that is dense in . ∎
For a Lie ideal in a unital -algebra , a subspace and an ideal in , it is easily seen that is a Lie ideal in . Note that, if , and are closed, then it is not clear whether the sum is closed or not. Marcoux, in [17, Theorem 3.1], had shown that for a UHF -algebra , the sum is always closed. Exploiting Marcoux’s technique, we prove the same in a more general setting. Before that, we first make the following observation:
Lemma 5.2**.**
Let be a compact Hausdorff space and be a -algebra with . Then, for any closed set in , the closed Lie ideal in corresponds to the closed Lie ideal
[TABLE]
in .
Proof.
Clearly, under the canonical -isomorphism between and , the closed Lie ideal is mapped onto a closed Lie ideal in . It just remains to show that the image is dense in . Let and . Then, , and as in the proof of 5.1, there exist finite sets and such that for all and . Since and , it readily follows that and we are done. ∎
An adaptation of Marcoux’s proof, gives us the following generalization of the sufficient condition of [17, Theorem 3.1].
Proposition 5.3**.**
Let be a compact Hausdorff space and be a unital -algebra. If , then a subspace of the form , where is a closed ideal and is a closed subspace in , is a closed Lie ideal in the -algebra .
Proof.
It is easy to verify that is a Lie ideal. We only need to show that is closed. Now, let be a sequence in converging to some in . Decompose , where and . Since is isometrically isomorphic to , we can assume that for all and .
Clearly is uniformly convergent to for all . Since , we have , so that also converges uniformly to for all .
Since , there exists a such that for all ; so that for all and . This implies that is Cauchy and hence converges uniformly to some in . Since is closed, is closed and we have .
Finally, converges uniformly to (say) in . Since for all and , we have for all . Also, if , then for all and hence as well. Therefore, by Lemma 5.2, and is closed. ∎
In the reverse direction, as yet another application of the -isomorphism between and , we will have two instances to appeal to the following observation (from [17, Theorem 3.1]):
Lemma 5.4**.**
Let be a compact Hausdorff space and be a simple unital -algebra. For any closed ideal in , we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
By 3.1, is of the form for some closed ideal in . Clearly, . And if , then for all . In particular, for each , if denotes the constant function taking the value , then for all , where is the closed set in that determines the closed ideal , i.e., . Thus, for all . If , then after identifying with , by Tietze’s Extension Theorem, can be extended to a scalar-valued map on so that . Since for all , we have , so that ∎
Lemma 5.5**.**
Let be a compact Hausdorff space, be a simple unital -algebra and be a closed ideal in . Then,
- (1)
\overline{[A\otimes^{\min}C(X),A\otimes^{\min}J]}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}\overline{sl(A)\otimes J}&\mathrm{if}\ \mathcal{T}(A)\neq\emptyset,\ \mathrm{and}\\ A\otimes^{\min}J&\mathrm{if}\ \mathcal{T}(A)=\emptyset.\end{array}\right.** 2. (2)
If admits a unique tracial state and is a closed subspace of satisfying
[TABLE]
then is a closed Lie ideal and is of the form for some closed subspace in .
Proof.
By Lemma 4.2, we have and it is easily verified that . Therefore, by 2.1, we obtain the desired forms for .
By Lemma 4.2, we also have , and therefore is a closed Lie ideal. The fact that must be of above form follows on the lines of a part of the proof of [17, Theorem 3.1]. We, therefore, just mention the steps involved and omit the details:
From , we see that . By Lemma 5.4, we have , and since is a singleton, we also have . Using 5.1 and Lemma 5.2, one then deduces that, in fact, . And, therefore, since is a closed subspace satisfying
[TABLE]
by 5.3, we must have for some closed subspace of . ∎
Note that a subspace of the form where is a closed ideal and is a subspace of is clearly a closed Lie ideal of the -algebra . The crux of the next theorem is that all closed Lie ideals of arise as in 5.3, the first part of which is a generalization of the necessary condition of [17, Theorem 3.1].
Theorem 5.6**.**
Let be a compact Hausdorff space and be a simple unital -algebra with at most one tracial state. Then a subspace of is a closed Lie ideal if and only if
[TABLE]
for some closed ideal and closed subspace in .
Proof.
We just need to prove the only if part in both cases. Let be a closed Lie ideal in .
Suppose . Since is a -algebra and is simple, by 4.7 and 3.1, there exists a closed ideal in for some closed ideal in , such that
[TABLE]
then has the required form by Lemma 5.5.
Suppose has no tracial states. Since is a -algebra, and embeds in as a -subalgebra, also does not admit any tracial state. Therefore, since is simple, by 4.7, 4.9 and 3.1, there exists a closed ideal of for some closed ideal of , such that
[TABLE]
Again, as in , by Lemma 5.4, we see that . Now, being closed, so is implying that is closed. In particular, must be of the form
[TABLE]
for some closed subspace in . ∎
6. Closed Lie ideals of
In this section, we will analyze the Lie ideals of the tensor product spaces and . For this, we need an auxillary result from Brešar et. al ([6]). For the sake of completeness, we include a short discussion on the pre-requisites. Throughout this section, will be assumed to be a seperable Hilbert space.
Given any unit vector in a Hilbert space , one considers the rank one orthogonal projection given by . Then, for any finite orthonormal system in a Hilbert space , consider the orthogonal projection and the completely positive maps maps given by and for .
Clearly is a complete contraction on and the same is true about , which can be seen as follows.
Lemma 6.1**.**
For every finite orthonormal system in a Hilbert space , is a complete contraction on .
Proof.
It is enough to show that the map is a complete contraction. Consider the orthogonal decomposition . Then, for each , corresponds to the diagonal matrix operator . Therefore, for all . Now, for , we have
[TABLE]
where is a projection in . So, as above is a contraction on for all . ∎
A tensor norm is said to be completely positive uniform if for every completely positive map , , the canonical linear map has a continuous extension satisfying .
Many known tensor norms are completely positive uniform including the -injective norm , the -projective norm , the Haagerup norm , the operator space projective norm and the Banach space injective and projective norms and - see [5, 8, 24].
The following is an analogue of [6, Corollary 5.22] and follows directly from their deep result ([6, Theorem 5.15]) which involves some serious algebraic techniques.
Proposition 6.2**.**
Let be a unital -algebra and be a completely positive uniform algebra tensor norm. Then a closed subspace of the Banach algebra is a Lie ideal if and only if it is a closed ideal and has the form for some closed ideal in .
Proof.
Let be a finite orthonormal system in . Since is completely positive uniform, and are completely positive and completely contractive, the maps extend continuously on and satisfy . Therefore, by [6, Theorem 5.15], every closed Lie ideal in is a closed ideal and has the form for some closed ideal of . ∎
Corollary 6.3**.**
If is a unital -algebra and is either the Haagerup norm or the operator space projective norm, then any closed Lie ideal of is precisely of the form for some closed ideal in .
Proof.
The Haagerup norm and the operator space projective norm are completely positive uniform algebra tensor norms ([5, Proposition 2] and [8, Theorem 3.2]). The assertion made in the statement then follows from 6.2, the injectivity of and the fact that ([12, Theorem 5]). ∎
Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank Leonel Robert for bringing to our notice his recent work [23] which was instrumental in the improvement of Section 4.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] C. A. Akemann and G. K. Pedersen, Ideal perturbations of elements in C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras, Math. Scand., 41, 1977, 117 - 139.
- 2[2] W. B. Arveson, Notes on extensions of C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras, Duke Math. J., 44, 1977, 329 - 355.
- 3[3] S. D. Allen, A. M. Sinclair and R. R. Smith, The ideal structure of the Haagerup tensor product of C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras, J. Reine Angew. Math., 442, 1993, 111-148.
- 4[4] B. Blackadar, Operator algebras: Theory of C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras and von Neumann algebras, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
- 5[5] D. P. Blecher, Geometry of tensor product of C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 104, 1988, 119-127.
- 6[6] M. Bresar, E. Kissin and V. S. Shulman, Lie ideals: from pure algebra to C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras, J. Reine Angew. Math 623, 2008, 73-121.
- 7[7] J. Cuntz and G. K. Pederson, Equivalence and traces on C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras, J. Funct. Anal., 33 (2) , 1979, 135-164.
- 8[8] E. G. Effors and Z.-J. Ruan, Operator Spaces, LMS Monographs New Series 23, Oxford University Press, 2000.
