# Mean field at distance one

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the validity of the mean field at distance one approximation for dynamic networks, especially considering demographic changes and their impact on network dependencies relevant to disease spread modeling.

## Contribution

It clarifies when the mean field at distance one assumption is valid for dynamic networks and discusses its limitations with demographic changes and infection modeling.

## Key findings

- Valid for static networks when averaging is done correctly.
- Supports the assumption's validity in certain dynamic network models.
- Highlights dependencies introduced by demographic changes.

## Abstract

To be able to understand how infectious diseases spread on networks, it is important to understand the network structure itself in the absence of infection. In this text we consider dynamic network models that are inspired by the (static) configuration network. The networks are described by population-level averages such as the fraction of the population with $k$ partners, $k=0,1,2,\ldots$ This means that the bookkeeping contains information about individuals and their partners, but no information about partners of partners. Can we average over the population to obtain information about partners of partners? The answer is `it depends', and this is where the mean field at distance one assumption comes into play. In this text we explain that, yes, we may average over the population (in the right way) in the static network. Moreover, we provide evidence in support of a positive answer for the network model that is dynamic due to partnership changes. If, however, we additionally allow for demographic changes, dependencies between partners arise. In earlier work we used the slogan `mean field at distance one' as a justification of simply ignoring the dependencies. Here we discuss the subtleties that come with the mean field at distance one assumption, especially when demography is involved. Particular attention is given to the accuracy of the approximation in the setting with demography. Next, the mean field at distance one assumption is discussed in the context of an infection superimposed on the network. We end with the conjecture that an extension of the bookkeeping leads to an exact description of the network structure.