In-class vs. online administration of concept inventories and attitudinal assessments
Manher Jariwala, Jada-Simone S. White, Ben Van Dusen, and Eleanor W., Close

TL;DR
This study compares student responses and participation rates between in-class and online administrations of physics concept inventories and attitudes surveys, providing insights into best practices for online testing environments.
Contribution
It offers empirical data on how testing environments influence participation and response quality in physics assessments.
Findings
Higher participation in in-class testing
Online testing shows lower response rates
Best practices identified for online assessment administration
Abstract
This study investigates differences in student responses to in-class and online administrations of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM), and the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS). Close to 700 physics students from 12 sections of three different courses were instructed to complete the concept inventory relevant to their course, either the FCI or CSEM, and the CLASS. Each student was randomly assigned to take one of the surveys in class and the other survey online using the LA Supported Student Outcomes (LASSO) system hosted by the Learning Assistant Alliance (LAA). We examine how testing environments and instructor practices affect participation rates and identify best practices for future use.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
