Rydberg states of helium in electric and magnetic fields of arbitrary relative orientation
Ond\v{r}ej Tk\'a\v{c}, Matija \v{Z}e\v{s}ko, Josef Anton Agner,, Hansj\"urg Schmutz, Fr\'ed\'eric Merkt

TL;DR
This paper investigates helium Rydberg states under various electric and magnetic field orientations, comparing experimental spectra with theoretical calculations to understand level interactions and mixing effects relevant for cold atom and molecule trapping.
Contribution
It provides a detailed spectroscopic analysis of helium Rydberg states in arbitrary field orientations, including new insights into avoided crossings and $m_l$-mixing effects.
Findings
Avoided crossings between different $m_l$ levels observed.
Pronounced $m_l$-mixing effects at non-zero angles.
Spectra well-matched with Hamiltonian eigenvalue calculations.
Abstract
A spectroscopic study of Rydberg states of helium ( = 30 and 45) in magnetic, electric and combined magnetic and electric fields with arbitrary relative orientations of the field vectors is presented. The emphasis is on two special cases where (i) the diamagnetic term is negligible and both paramagnetic Zeeman and Stark effects are linear ( = 30, 120 mT and = 0 - 78 V/cm ), and (ii) the diamagnetic term is dominant and the Stark effect is linear ( = 45, = 277 mT and = 0 - 8 V/cm). Both cases correspond to regimes where the interactions induced by the electric and magnetic fields are much weaker than the Coulomb interaction, but much stronger than the spin-orbit interaction. The experimental spectra are compared to spectra calculated by determining the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian matrix describing helium Rydberg states in the external fields. The spectra…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
- December 2015
Rydberg States of Helium in Electric and Magnetic Fields of Arbitrary Relative Orientation
Ondřej Tkáč, Matija Žeško, Josef A. Agner, Hansjürg Schmutz, Frédéric Merkt
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract
A spectroscopic study of Rydberg states of helium (*n *= 30 and 45) in magnetic, electric and combined magnetic and electric fields with arbitrary relative orientations of the field vectors is presented. The emphasis is on two special cases where (i) the diamagnetic term is negligible and both paramagnetic Zeeman and Stark effects are linear ( = 30, 120 mT and = 0 - 78 V/cm ), and (ii) the diamagnetic term is dominant and the Stark effect is linear ( = 45, = 277 mT and = 0 - 8 V/cm). Both cases correspond to regimes where the interactions induced by the electric and magnetic fields are much weaker than the Coulomb interaction, but much stronger than the spin-orbit interaction. The experimental spectra are compared to spectra calculated by determining the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian matrix describing helium Rydberg states in the external fields. The spectra and the calculated energy-level diagrams in external fields reveal avoided crossings between levels of different values and pronounced -mixing effects at all angles between the electric and magnetic field vectors other than 0. These observations are discussed in the context of the development of a method to generate dense samples of cold atoms and molecules in a magnetic trap following Rydberg-Stark deceleration.
pacs:
32.80.Ee
††: Journal of Physics B-Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics
Keywords: Rydberg state, Stark effect, Zeeman effect, mixing
\ioptwocol
1 Introduction
The investigation of the effects of external magnetic and electric fields on atomic spectra is an important activity in atomic physics. Many theoretical and experimental studies have been made to understand the energy-level structure of Rydberg atoms in magnetic, electric and combined electric and magnetic fields [1, 2]. However, most studies were performed for only one of the two fields or for the special cases of parallel or perpendicular orientations of the electric and magnetic field vectors. Many studies of the effects of magnetic fields were performed using strong fields, for which the diamagnetic contribution is dominant, starting with the early work of Jenkins and Segré [3] and the discovery of quasi-Landau resonances by Garton and Tomkins [4]. Zimmerman et al. [5] studied the diamagnetism of Na Rydberg states by high-resolution spectroscopy and analyzed in detail the magnetic-field dependence of the level structure from the low to the high field regime. The effects of high magnetic fields were also explored experimentally in the Rydberg states of other atoms, including barium [6], helium [7], rubidium [8] and hydrogen in the quasi-Landau regime [9].
The pure Stark effect was also studied in numerous Rydberg atoms, including the alkali and alkaline-earth metal atoms [10, 11, 12, 13] and the rare gases [14, 15, 16, 17] and in molecules [18, 19, 20, 21].
Early experiments on Rydberg states in parallel electric and magnetic fields were performed in lithium [22, 23, 24], hydrogen [25] and helium [26]. These studies also presented complete analyses of the observed structures, from which resulted a detailed understanding of the relevant physical processes and a classification of the Rydberg states according to different types of behaviour in the fields. In all cases, excellent agreement between measured and calculated spectra was obtained. Recently, the Rydberg spectrum of Rb was studied in the presence of strong magnetic and weak parallel electric fields in the -mixing regime, with the goal of preparing states of large dipole moments and large optical excitation cross sections for possible applications in quantum information processing [27].
An experimental study of Rydberg states of H in strong perpendicular magnetic and electric fields was reported by Weibusch et al. [28]. The effect of perpendicular electric and magnetic fields was also examined in Rydberg states of rubidium [29, 30], sodium [31] and barium [32, 33]. Rydberg atoms in strong perpendicular electric and magnetic fields are of interest because they exhibit a potential energy surface for the electron motion that has two minima [34, 35]. A narrow and deep potential well is centered at the nucleus and arises from the Coulomb interaction, whereas a shallower well occurs at large distances from the nucleus. The first experimental evidence of a field-induced potential minimum at large distances was reported by Fauth et al. [36] following observation of the large electric dipole moment associated with these states. Rydberg atoms in strong perpendicular electric and magnetic fields are also of interest for studying the quantum-mechanical properties of systems for which the corresponding classical behaviour is chaotic [37, 38], which is the case when the interactions with the external fields become comparable in strength to the Coulomb interaction [39, 40].
Only a few theoretical studies have been devoted to the behaviour of Rydberg atoms in electric and magnetic fields with arbitrary relative orientations. Calculations for weak external fields using perturbation theory were reported in [41, 42] and the effects of strong electric and magnetic fields were studied in [43, 44]. In their theoretical study of the hydrogen atom in combined electric and magnetic fields with arbitrary relative orientations, Main et al. [45] predicted large avoided crossings between eigenstates of the same approximately conserved values, a phenomenon which was interpreted as a quantum manifestation of intramanifold chaos.
Our motivation to study the spectrum of Rydberg states of He in electric and magnetic fields with arbitrary relative orientations originated in experiments in which we seek to develop a new trap-loading scheme for cold paramagnetic atoms and molecules in supersonic beams relying on Rydberg-Stark deceleration and trapping [46]. The strategy we follow to increase the density of cold trapped atoms and molecules consists of first decelerating and deflecting the Rydberg atoms using a Rydberg-Stark decelerator [46, 47, 48], loading the atoms in an off-axis electric trap and waiting for them to radiatively decay to the ground or a metastable state, i.e., the 1s2s 3S1 = 2 3S1 state in the case of He. Superimposing a magnetic trap on the electric trap would enable us to increase the density of trapped atoms at each cycle of our experimental procedure. A similar strategy, but based on multistage Stark deceleration rather than Rydberg-Stark deceleration, has been pursued to trap NH molecules [49].
Figure 1 shows the distributions of electric (red arrows) and magnetic (blue arrows) fields in the overlaid electric and magnetic traps. The electric trap is generated by four electrodes in quadrupole configuration, and the magnetic trap, with a field minimum at the centre of the electric trap, is created by two permanent magnets placed above and below the plane of the figure. Atoms trapped in such electric- and magnetic-field distributions experience all possible relative orientations between the electric- and magnetic-field vectors. Whereas the weak electric fields we use for trapping ( V/cm, see figure 1) will not influence the behaviour of the ground state or metastable states accumulating in the trap, one can anticipate that the magnetic fields of up to 50 mT will influence the Rydberg-Stark deceleration and trapping processes. The success of Rydberg-Stark deceleration and trapping experiments critically depends on the ability to carry out realistic particle-trajectory simulations and these in turn require a good knowledge of the field dependence of the energy levels. The purpose of the study presented in this article is to develop and validate efficient procedures to compute the energy-level structure of Rydberg atoms (and molecules) in electric and magnetic fields of arbitrary relative orientation. Spectroscopic studies of Rydberg states of He in magnetic, electric and combined magnetic and electric fields with arbitrary relative orientations are presented here as a necessary step in our overall strategy.
Procedures to compute Rydberg spectra in pure electric fields, pure magnetic fields, and parallel and perpendicular electric and magnetic fields are well established, as reviewed above. We nevertheless chose to present such spectra because (1) pure Stark and Zeeman spectra are essential to calibrate the field strengths by comparison between experimental and computed spectra, (2) the field strengths themselves are crucial to accurately set the angle between electric and magnetic fields, and (3) spectra recorded for parallel and perpendicular electric and magnetic fields are useful, as limiting cases, in the validation of the procedure devised to calculate spectra for arbitrary angles between the electric- and magnetic-field vectors.
At the values around 30 used and the typical fields of 0-250 V/cm and 0-50 mT relevant for our planned trapping schemes, the Stark and Zeeman interactions are much below the range where quantum chaos is expected. These interactions can be adequately treated by perturbation theory, which is the approach we follow in the analysis of our spectra. Because adiabatic transitions between Rydberg states of different electric dipole moments have an adverse effect on the deceleration and trapping efficiency, emphasis is placed on the characterization of avoided crossings between the Rydberg states in energy-level maps in which the energy eigenvalues are plotted as a function of the electric field, the magnetic field, and the angle between the field vectors.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 contains the descriptions of the experimental setup and the method of calculating the spectra of Rydberg helium in external fields. The experimental spectra are presented and discussed in Section 3, where they are also compared with calculated spectra. The discussion starts with the simplest case of Rydberg helium spectra measured in pure magnetic and pure electric fields, continues with the special cases of parallel and perpendicular fields and ends with the general case of fields with arbitrary relative orientation. A brief conclusion is given in Section 4.
2 Methods
2.1 Experimental setup
A schematic view of the experimental setup is presented in figure 2. A cold supersonic beam of helium is formed by expanding pure He gas into vacuum from a reservoir held at a stagnation pressure of 2.5 bar using a pulsed valve. The valve is cooled to 130 K with liquid nitrogen, resulting in a beam velocity of 1200 m/s. Triplet 2 3S1 helium (called metastable He or He* hereafter) is produced in an electric discharge in the high-pressure region at the exit of the nozzle, as described in [50]. After passing a skimmer, the He* atoms enter a photoexcitation and ionization region surrounded by four parallel cylindrically-symmetric electrodes and by two pairs of coils in Helmholtz configuration. The separation between the outer two electrodes in the stack is 1.5 cm and the four electrodes are equally spaced. The inner two electrodes are used to ensure the homogeneity of the electric field in the photoexcitation region. To generate magnetic fields perpendicular (parallel) to the electric field, two coils are used with a center-to-center distance of 50 mm (33 mm) and inner and outer radii of 84 (44.5) and 114.6 (75.1) mm, respectively. The number of windings of each coil is 70.
The He* atoms are excited to Rydberg states using a pulsed (repetition rate 25 Hz, pulse duration 3 ns, pulse energy 150 J) narrow-band (full width at half maximum 150 MHz) UV laser with a wavelength tunable in the region between 260.41 and 260.88 nm for transitions from the 2 3S1 state to Rydberg states with between 30 and 45. To generate the UV laser radiation, a continuous-wave single-mode tunable IR diode laser (power 30 mW, wavelength 782 nm) is pulse amplified using three successive dye cells operated with the dye Styryl 11 and pumped with the second harmonic (532 nm) of a Nd:YAG laser. The output (1 mJ/pulse) of the dye amplification stages is frequency doubled with a BBO crystal, and the doubled light, with a wavelength of 391 nm, is mixed in another BBO crystal with the fundamental IR laser output to get the desired UV radiation. The vacuum wavenumber of the UV laser radiation is determined from the wavenumber of the IR radiation, which is measured using a wavemeter (accuracy 3 200 MHz). The He Rydberg atoms (n = 30 or 45) are detected by field ionization with a pulsed electric field of 2 kV/cm, which also extracts the He+ ions toward a detector consisting of a pair of microchannel plates in chevron configuration. The joint effects of the laser bandwidth and Doppler broadening led to single transitions having full widths at half maximum of 0.007 cm-1. Consequently, all calculated stick spectra were convoluted with a Gaussian line-shape function of 0.007 cm*-1*.
Figure 2 schematically illustrates the relative orientations of the molecular beam, the laser beam, the laser polarization (), the axis of the cylindrically symmetric electrode stack used to generate the electric field () and the axes of the two solenoid pairs used to produce the magnetic fields ( and ). The atomic beam propagates in a direction parallel to the electric field. The magnetic field can be produced at arbitrary angle to the electric field in the , plane by adjusting the currents flowing through the two pairs of coils. When the magnetic-field vector points parallel to the He* beam and the He+ flight axis ( axis in figure 2), the Lorentz force does not deflect the ions. Consequently, the maximal value of the magnetic field in direction is only limited by the current that can be applied to the coils, i.e., 200 A, corresponding to mT. When the magnetic field is applied in the direction perpendicular to the ion flight axis, the Lorentz force deflects the ions, which makes it impossible to record spectra for mT.
The laser polarization used for the experiments is chosen so as to be predominantly perpendicular to both the electric and magnetic fields, implying the selection rule for the transition from the 2 3S1 state to the Rydberg states. In some experiments, the laser polarization was slightly tilted (less than 5), so that the = 0 component in the pure Zeeman spectra and the 31s level in the pure Stark spectra and the spectra recorded for parallel fields could also be observed. The effects of the slightly tilted polarization on the spectra recorded in combined electric and magnetic fields are too weak to be observed. The calibration of the magnetic field is performed by measuring the Zeeman splitting for a range of currents applied to the two pairs of coils and determining the relationship between current and magnetic field for each pair of coils separately. Since the beam velocity is parallel to the applied electric field, the motional Zeeman effect is zero. The motional Stark effect resulting from the magnetic-field component perpendicular to the beam propagation axis is 0.09 V/cm for = 8 mT and is negligible compared to the typical electric-field strengths used in this work.
2.2 Theoretical treatment
The Hamiltonian describing a He Rydberg atom in combined electric and magnetic fields with a relative orientation specified by the angle is given in atomic units by
[TABLE]
if the axis is chosen to coincide with the magnetic field. The magnetic field is given in atomic units of = 2.35 T and the electric field in atomic units of = 5.14 V/cm. is the unperturbed (zero-field) Hamiltonian of the helium atom. The zero-field energies are calculated from Rydberg’s formula using the known quantum defects for triplet ( = 1) helium ( = 0.2967, = 0.0684, = 0.0029 and = 0 [51]). The second term in the Hamiltonian (1) is the paramagnetic term and and are the orbital and spin angular-momentum operators of the Rydberg electron in the direction of the magnetic field ( axis), respectively, and is the electron factor. The diamagnetic term can be neglected if and does not play a significant role at = 30 for the magnetic field strengths used in the current study, except for the spectra recorded at magnetic field strengths above 100 mT. The last two terms in the Hamiltonian (1) describe the interaction with the electric field along the and axes.
If an electric or a magnetic field is applied, the orbital angular momentum quantum number is no longer a good quantum number. Only the projection of the orbital angular momentum onto the axis of the field, , with = -, -+1, …, , is a constant of motion. The same is true for parallel electric and magnetic fields. When these fields are not parallel, also the cylindrical symmetry is broken and not even is a good quantum number any more.
The diamagnetic term is diagonal in but mixes all states of the same parity according to the selection rule without restriction on . The Stark Hamiltonian (last two terms in Hamiltonian (1)) has components along the and axes and couples states according to the selection rule . The component conserves the quantum number , whereas the component mixes states differing in by . Both components can couple states of different values, but at the electric fields used in this investigation the coupling between adjacent manifolds is small compared to the coupling within one manifold. The paramagnetic term is diagonal in , and .
In the cases of a strong magnetic field or of a very weak spin-orbit coupling, and couple more strongly to the magnetic field than to each other and precess independently about the magnetic-field direction. The total angular momentum of the Rydberg electron is no longer a constant of motion, but is. This situation corresponds to the Paschen-Back regime, which describes the = 30 and 45 Rydberg states of He explored in this work accurately, because the spin-orbit interaction is very weak in a light atom such as He and scales as . The Paschen-Back regime and the selection rules , allow us to ignore the spin part of the Hamiltonian. All spectra presented in this article were recorded in the regime where the magnetic interaction is much weaker than the Coulomb interaction but at the same time much stronger than the spin-orbit interaction. The spectra for magnetic-field strengths beyond 100 mT were calculated using Hamiltonian (1) but disregarding the electron spin. The Hamiltonian can also be expressed in a coordinate system with the axis chosen to coincide with the electric field
[TABLE]
This coordinate system is not suitable for expressing the diamagnetic interaction, and this Hamiltonian was used only for weak magnetic fields ( 20 mT). In this case, the paramagnetic term along the axis is diagonal in and but mixes states with . To compute the Rydberg-excitation spectra, the Hamiltonians (1) or (2) are expressed in matrix form using = basis functions and the line positions and intensities are derived from its eigenvalues and eigenfunctions.
The number of states that need to be included in the calculations to accurately reproduce the level positions depends on the electric- and magnetic-field strengths [14]. For the electric- and magnetic-field strengths used in the present investigation to record spectra around = 30 ( V/cm and mT), the basis set had to include all states with = 29 - 32, = 0, …, -1 and = -, -+1, …, , i.e., a total of 3726 functions, to correctly reproduce the line positions. Using Hamiltonian (2) instead of (1) enables one to reduce the size of the basis set and to include only states with in calculations performed for large electric fields and small magnetic fields. No significant difference was found in the spectra calculated for perpendicular fields of 78 V/cm and 20 mT with either a full basis set or the reduced basis set. The radial part of the matrix elements was computed using radial functions evaluated numerically for = 0 - 2 using Numerov’s integration method in combination with the known values of the quantum defects, following the procedure described by Zimmerman *et al. *for alkali-metal atoms [11]. The spectra for magnetic-field strengths below 20 mT were calculated with the Hamiltonian (2) including the full = -, …, basis set. Calculations based on Hamiltonian (2) with the truncated basis of states were exploited in the calculation of correlation diagrams, when the use of a full basis made it more difficult to assign quantum numbers to a given state.
Single-photon excitation from the metastable 2 3S1 level with radiation polarized linearly in the plane provides access to the = 1, = 1 components of the Rydberg wave functions. Consequently, the relative spectral intensity of a transition to the Rydberg states mixed by the Stark and Zeeman effects can be determined as
[TABLE]
where and represent the coefficients of the and basis functions in the -th eigenfunction.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Spectra recorded in pure magnetic fields
Figure 3(a) presents the energy-level structure calculated for = 30, levels of He for magnetic fields in the range 0 - 250 mT. The main effect of the field is to split each zero-field level into the two components separated by . The effects of the diamagnetic term of the Hamiltonian become apparent at fields beyond 100 mT as (1) a splitting of the high- manifold () of Zeeman levels into 27 levels for each of the = 1 and = -1 group, (2) the gradual integration of the d Zeeman levels in the high- manifold, and (3) an asymmetric splitting of the p levels with respect to the zero-field position of the p state.
For magnetic fields below 230 mT, the mixing of the optically accessible 30p level with nonpenetrating = 3, 5, 7, …, 29 levels induced by the diamagnetic term of the Hamiltonian [see Hamiltonian (1)] is still extremely weak, so that only the 30p level could be observed within the sensitivity limit of our experiments. Calculations based on formula (3) indicate that the intensities of transitions to the high- manifold of = 30 Zeeman levels are more than 1000 times weaker than the transitions to the p state and that these transitions would only become observable at magnetic fields of 750 mT, which are, unfortunately, not accessible with our solenoids. Consequently, only the third effect of the diamagnetic term listed above can be observed experimentally at = 30.
Figures 3(b) and (c) depict the Zeeman spectra recorded in the vicinity of the 2 3S 30 3P transition for a perpendicular polarization of the UV laser [figure 3(c)] and for a slightly tilted polarization [figure 3(b)] and compares the spectra with the spectra calculated for . The observation of the = 0 component in figure 3(b) makes it possible to recognize the asymmetric splitting of the levels.
To verify that our numerical procedure to calculate Zeeman spectra correctly accounts for the diamagnetic term, spectra were also measured for = 45 at a field of 272 mT. At this value and this magnetic-field strength, the diamagnetic interaction, which scales as , is strong enough to induce significant mixing and to make all Zeeman levels of negative parity observable, as illustrated by figure 4. The pure Zeeman spectra follow the general trends of the diamagnetic Zeeman effect discussed in previous articles [7, 9, 52] and are labeled with the state index , which, at = 45, ranges from 0 to 42 in steps of 2 [7]. A dashed vertical line, called the separatrix in earlier work [7, 9, 52], divides the Zeeman levels into two groups regarded as ”vibrational” and ”rotational” states [7].
3.2 Spectra recorded in pure electric fields
Figure 5 presents the results of calculations of the Stark effect of ( = 1) He Rydberg states with in the range 29 - 31. The calculations were carried out starting from Hamiltonian (2) with = 0 T using only levels in the basis, which rules out any contribution from s levels. The quantum defect of the p series is large enough so that the p levels appear well separated from the manifold of high- () Stark levels and are subject to a quadratic Stark shift at low fields. The field at which neighboring Stark manifolds start overlapping - this field is known as Inglis-Teller field [1, 53] and can be calculated in atomic units as - is 71 V/cm between = 30 and 31 and 83 V/cm between = 29 and 30.
The experimental Stark spectra recorded at fields of 30, 60.7 and 78 V/cm (indicated by vertical dashed lines in figure 5) are compared with calculated spectra in figure 6. Apart from the line corresponding to the 31s level (this line is present in the experimental spectra because of the slight tilt of the UV laser polarization vector away from a perfect perpendicular arrangement (see Section 2.1), but absent from the calculated spectra), the agreement between experimental and calculated spectra is excellent. The spectra recorded for = 30 consist of 29 equally spaced lines (not all shown in figure 6) corresponding to the Stark states with Stark index running from -28 to 28 in steps of two. At 78 V/cm [figure 6(c)], the = 30 and 31 Stark manifolds partially overlap, which leads to a more congested spectrum in the region of overlap. The crossings between the Stark states of different manifolds are weakly avoided. The avoided crossings are difficult to see in figures 5(a) and 6(c), but can be seen on the enlarged scale of figure 5(b).
3.3 Spectra recorded in parallel electric and magnetic fields
The case of Rydberg atoms in weak parallel electric and magnetic fields has been extensively studied in hydrogen [25], lithium [23, 22], helium [26] and theoretically in alkali-metal atoms [54]. The results obtained in the present study for the = 1 states of He are briefly summarized here for completeness. The emphasis is placed on the two special cases where the diamagnetic term has only minor effects and both paramagnetic Zeeman and Stark effects are linear ( = 30, = 120 mT and = 30 - 78 V/cm), and where the diamagnetic term is dominant and the Stark effect is linear ( = 45, = 277 mT and = 0.7 - 8 V/cm).
A comparison between experimental and calculated spectra in the vicinity of the = 30 manifold for = 120 mT and = 30, 60 and 78 V/cm is presented in figure 7. Figure 8(a) provides an overview of the calculated energy level structure for = 120 mT and in the range 0 - 78 V/cm (blue lines) and also displays sections of the spectra (black lines) calculated at = 30, 60 and 78 V/cm. At 60 and 78 V/cm, the effect of the magnetic field is to split the components of all Stark states in doublets separated by . At 60 V/cm, the splitting is almost exactly half the spacing between adjacent Stark states so that the spectrum appears as a single regular series of lines. At 30 V/cm, the Stark manifold consists of 30 lines instead of the 29 lines expected for a , = 30 Stark manifold. The reason for the additional line is the fact that the Zeeman doublets have the same spacing as the adjacent members of the Stark manifold. Consequently, each of the inner 28 lines corresponds to two transitions, one to the , = -1 state and the other to the , = 1 state.
The approximate linearity of both Zeeman and Stark effects implies the existence of sets of crossings between states of the = +1 and = -1 manifolds at electric fields approximately given by the condition (in atomic units)
[TABLE]
The region where these intermanifold crossings take place is limited to the electric field range between 1.04 V/cm ( = 28) and 29.2 V/cm ( = 1). Not all levels undergo all 28 crossings: The = 28, = +1 level does not cross any other level, the = 26, = +1 level crosses only one level ( = 28, = -1) and only the = -28, = +1 level undergoes all 28 crossings. The exact nature of the crossings, which results from the fact that is a good quantum number when the fields are parallel, render the appearance of the level structure simple in the range where both Zeeman and Stark effects are linear (see figure 8(a)). The situation changes completely when the fields are perpendicular, as illustrated by the level structure presented for comparison in figure 8(b) (see also section 3.4). The coupling of states of different values leads to many avoided crossings and characteristic groups of levels, merging at low fields to states of well-defined values.
Figure 9 compares experimental and calculated spectra of = 45 Rydberg states of helium for parallel fields = 277 mT and = 0.7, 3 and 7.9 V/cm, i.e., in a regime where the diamagnetic interaction is significant. The agreement between experimental (red lines) and calculated (black lines) is excellent for all three electric-field strengths. To characterize the spectra recorded in the regime of combined Stark and diamagnetic effects, the approximate constant of motion was exploited, given by [55, 22, 23, 24]
[TABLE]
where is the Runge-Lenz vector, is its projection along the field axis, and the parameter
[TABLE]
represents the relative strength of the linear Stark interaction with respect to the diamagnetic one. The eigenvalues of Hamiltonian (1) (neglecting electron spin) can be written as , where is the zero-field energy, is the paramagnetic shift and
[TABLE]
describes the contribution of the diamagnetic interaction and the linear Stark effect.
In the case of parallel electric and magnetic fields, three classes of states can be observed [22, 23, 24, 26]: vibrational states with positive (class I) or negative (class II) dipole moment and rotational states (class III). Vibrational and rotational states are separated from each other by a separatrix as already discussed in Section 3.1. The position of the separatrix is given by [55]. Class III states transform one by one into class I states when approaches or [55]. The field dependence of the =1 level structure at = 45 and = 277 mT is depicted in figure 10, which reveals a linear Stark effect for both types of vibrational states and a quadratic Stark effect for the rotational states. The interaction of the electric field with the dipole moment induced by the magnetic field results in positive (negative) energy shifts for class II (class I) states. Consequently, a multitude of level crossings occur between states of classes I and II at low fields.
The values of and determine the ranges in which the different classes of states exist [22, 23, 24, 26]. At values below , all three classes of states coexist. Classes I and II correspond to the lowest values and are encountered in the ranges () and (), respectively, whereas class III states are found in the range (). The spectrum depicted in figure 9(a), recorded at = 0.7 V/cm and = 277 mT () corresponds to this situation, and nicely reveals the structure expected for vibrational (black assignment marks) and rotational (blue assignment marks) states.
States belonging to class II with negative dipole moments are no longer encountered beyond . Between and class I and III states coexist and have values in the ranges () and (), respectively. The spectrum recorded at = 3 V/cm and = 277 mT () and depicted in figure 9(b) corresponds to this situation. As increases, class III states are gradually converted into class I states. At , the majority of states already belong to class I and form long anharmonic progressions ending at the positions of the two separatrices marked by vertical lines in figure 9(b). For , only class I states () exist. This situation is illustrated by the spectrum displayed in figure 9(c) which was recorded at = 7.9 V/cm and = 277 mT () and also by the spectra presented in figure 7, for which . This situation can be described by two progressions of almost equidistant Stark states, one with and the other with , separated by .
3.4 Spectra recorded in perpendicular electric and magnetic fields
The experimental and calculated spectra for perpendicular electric and magnetic fields are presented in figure 11 for magnetic fields of 7.2 mT and 15 mT, respectively, and for electric fields = 30, 60 and 78 V/cm. As explained in Section 2.1, the deflection of the He+ ions away from the detection axis by the Lorentz force prevents the use of perpendicular magnetic fields larger than 20 mT and reduces the signal-to-noise ratio of the spectra recorded at 15 mT shown in panels (b), (d) and (f). The calculated spectra reproduce all features of the experimental spectra, which consist of regularly spaced groups of three to five levels. The spacing between these level groups corresponds to the linear Stark effect. Although is not a good quantum number in this situation, approximate spectral assignment in terms of can be performed by exploiting the adiabatic correlations to the situation of zero-magnetic field, where is a good quantum number and levels differing in the sign of are degenerate.
Figure 12(a) shows a selected region of the calculated map of levels in dependence of the perpendicular magnetic-field strength at an electric-field strength of = 78 V/cm. The figure depicts the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian (2) set up with a basis limited to levels. Also shown in the figure are the calculated spectra for = 7.2 and 15 mT, which correspond to the regions enclosed in blue frames in figures 11(e,f). At these magnetic-field strengths, the spectra calculated by including only are almost identical to the spectra calculated using the full basis, indicating a negligible contribution of levels with .
The spectrum measured at = 7.2 mT and = 78 V/cm exhibits repeated structures of three peaks (see region enclosed in a blue frame in figure 11(e) and displayed on an enlarged scale in figure 12(a)). The strong transitions are to levels correlating adiabatically to a zero-magnetic-field level with = 1, whereas the two weaker transitions are to levels correlating to = 0 and degenerate levels at = 0 mT. The same labels can be assigned to the peaks in the spectrum recorded at = 60 V/cm and = 7.2 mT (figure 11(c)), but the intensities of the lines linked to the = 1 levels are weaker and those of the lines correlating to and levels are stronger, than at 78 V/cm. At a magnetic field of 15 mT (figure 11(f) and 12(a)), the intensity of the = 1 line is reduced and its position shifts to lower energies, whereas the = 0 and levels get closer to each other and gain intensity. The energy levels with are not degenerate any more at a magnetic field of 15 mT and only the transition to the lower level has nonzero intensity. A line corresponding to a transition to a level is visible in the calculated spectrum but is too weak to be observed experimentally. The transitions to the = 0 and levels are hardly distinguishable and even merge into a single line in the higher energy part of the = 60 V/cm spectrum (figure 11(d)) and an additional peak appears associated to a level correlating to at = 0 mT.
The degree of mixing in a given state can be quantified by evaluating the sum
[TABLE]
for each value. The distributions of values for the final states observed in the spectra recorded at 7.2 and 15 mT and 78 V/cm are presented in figures 12(c) and (d), respectively. The dominant character of the distribution in the range of magnetic fields 0-15 mT is the same as obtained by adiabatic correlation to the zero-magnetic-field situation. For example, the state correlating to a zero-magnetic-field level with has contributions mainly from = 2 and -2. In this case of large electric field, the mixing occur mainly between the closely spaced and levels.
Because and levels are degenerate at zero magnetic field the correlation to = 0 mT only enables the assignment of the absolute value of using correlation diagrams. However, by plotting the level energies against the angle between electric and magnetic fields (as will be discussed in Section 3.5), the transitions can be adiabatically connected to a situation where the electric and magnetic fields are parallel. In this situation, is still a good quantum number but and are not degenerate. The correlation diagram as a function of for = 78 V/cm and = 7.2 mT is shown in figure 12(b) together with the spectrum calculated for = 90. This figure reveals that the final levels of the four transitions observed in the spectrum measured at 7.2 mT (see figure 11(e)) can be connected in order of increasing wavenumber to Rydberg states with = -1, 0 and -2 levels.
In the spectra recorded at 30 V/cm (figure 11(a-b)), a repeated structure of four lines can be observed, two of which merge into a single line in the high-wavenumber range of both spectra, whereas the weak line in the spectrum measured at 15 mT disappears. The corresponding energy-level diagram is shown in figure 13(a) with superimposed calculated spectra for = 7.2 mT and 15 mT. The spectra calculated including only basis states (shown as red lines) reproduce the spectra calculated using the full basis (black lines) reasonably well. The small discrepancies suggest that a mixing with states plays a role at these field strengths, especially in the case of the spectrum measured at = 15 mT and = 30 V/cm. The distributions of values for the final states observed in the spectra recorded at 7.2 and 15 mT and 30 V/cm are presented in figures 13(b) and (c), respectively.
The spectra calculated at 7.2 and 15 mT and 30 V/cm indicate the importance of transitions to states of character and thus provide clear evidence for mixing induced by the perpendicular arrangements of the magnetic- and electric-field vectors [31]. In this case, the energy separation between levels of different values is comparable to the splitting between the and levels, resulting in extensive mixing. This strong mixing prevents one to assign the dominant character by adiabatic correlation to the zero-magnetic-field situation. Indeed, the adiabatic correlation to the zero-magnetic-field level and the largest contribution of the distribution are not in agreement. For example, the level C in the spectrum recorded at = 7.2 mT and 30 V/cm adiabatically connects to a zero-magnetic-field level with but has mainly contributions from = 0 and (red line in figure 13(b)).
3.5 Spectra measured in electric and magnetic fields with arbitrary relative orientations
The -mixing processes that take place when the electric- and magnetic-fields vectors are not parallel lead to the observation of more transitions. As illustration, figure 14 shows several spectra of = 30 and 31 Rydberg states recorded at an electric field of 78 V/cm for several combinations of magnetic fields and angles. Instead of the regular series of Stark states split in two components by the Zeeman effect observed at (see figure 7(c)), the spectra measured at consist of series of up to five transitions of varying strength and spacing, labeled B-F in figure 14(c). The energy-level structure depends on the angle between the fields. The nonvanishing interaction between states of different nominal values leads to more states being optically accessible, to avoided crossings between these states and to changing processes when Rydberg atoms move in regions where the angle between the fields varies spatially, as is the case in overlaid electric and magnetic traps (see figure 1).
In this section, we examine the dependence of the energy level structure and analyse the resulting -mixing and -changing processes. To this end, spectra were recorded for constant electric- and magnetic-field strengths but variable angles between the field vectors. The angle was adjusted by carefully setting the current flowing in the two pairs of coils (see figure 2) and thus the direction of the magnetic-field vector in the , plane while keeping the electric-field vector unchanged. Comparison between measured and calculated spectra was used to validate our model, with which specific aspects of the -changing processes could then be explored. The calculations were made based on Hamiltonian (2). Figure 15 compares the sections of the repeated spectral structures (as for example denoted in figure 14(c) by letters B-F) observed for several values of at field strengths of 78 V/cm and 8 mT (panel (a)) and 30 V/cm and 14.3 mT (panel (b)). A larger degree of mixing is expected in the latter case because of the less dominant role of the electric field. This expectation is directly confirmed by the comparison of figures 15(a) and (b). The values of used in the following discussion of these spectra always refer to the axis defined by the electric-field vector and is not a good symmetry label when .
The values, quantifying the degree of mixing (see equation (8)), corresponding to the spectra recorded at 78 V/cm and 8 mT and presented in figure 15(a) are displayed in the left column of figure 16. At , mixing does not occur, and the two eigenvectors corresponding to the transitions observed in figure 15(a) have contributions only from = 1 or = -1. At , all five transitions are to states dominated by a single value corresponding to the zero-magnetic-field situation. At and , the final state correlated to = +1 (-1) at zero-magnetic field has significant contribution from = -1 (+1). At , only one final level correlating to has nonzero intensity in the spectrum with equal contributions from = +1 and -1. The same holds true for final level correlating to . Consequently, at 78 V/cm, mixing occurs almost exclusively between the near-degenerate and levels of the pairs. The level structures and intensity patterns displayed in figure 15(a) are easiest to interpret near . In this case, each level pair is split in two components separated by with 2, 4 and 6 for 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The transitions to 1 levels (lines E and F) are the only ones allowed at . As increases, transitions to the 0 (line D) and 2 (lines B and C) levels become observable. The separation between the two levels of the and pairs follows the expected dependence and decreases with . Surprisingly, the pair behaves differently: the splitting between the components increases with , and only the level correlated with = -1 retains its intensity. With increasing , the components mix, forming a pair. At large values of , approaches the value of and the negative superposition, which correlates to the = 1 level at , loses its intensity because of the cancellation of transition-dipole amplitudes, while its spectral position remains unchanged. The positive superposition is shifted to lower energies and remains strong, but starts sharing its intensity with the = 0 level, with which it interacts at . The interaction of the negative superposition with the = 0 level vanishes, because of the cancellation. The interactions of the levels with the and levels are weaker because of the larger spectral separation and because the and levels, unlike the = 0 component, have no ”s” character.
Figure 15(b) shows spectra measured at 30 V/cm and 14.3 mT, i.e., in the regime where the quadratic Stark splittings between the levels of the same value are comparable to the pure Zeeman splittings, resulting in a higher degree of mixing. The contributions of individual values to the levels observed are shown in the right column of figure 16. At , the final states correlating to = +1 (-1) already have contributions from = 0 and = -1 (+1). The final states with dominant = 2, -2 and 0 character (denoted by D, E, F in figures 15(b) and 16) have also contributions from other values. The degree of mixing increases with . At , a dominant character can still be determined for each final level and is = -3, -1, 2, 0, -4 and 3 of the levels denoted by B, C, D, E, F and G, respectively. Final states in the spectra measured at and are so strongly mixed that it is not possible to unambiguously identify the dominant character any more.
The contributions are symmetric around = 0 for all three final states in the spectrum measured at = 78 V/cm, = 8 mT and . This symmetry is not observed for . Experimental and calculated spectra of = 30 Rydberg states of helium at = 13 mT, and = 30, 60 and 78 V/cm are compared in figure 17, which also displays the electric-field dependence of the energy levels. The spectra measured at = 60 and 78 V/cm show the repeated structure of the five peaks discussed above (see figure 15(a)). The spectral structure at = 30 V/cm is dominated by three closely spaced peaks. Figure 17 illustrates the complex energy-level structure, with multiple avoided crossings also apparent in figures 15(b) and 7(b). Adiabatic traversals of these crossings change and often also the electric dipole moment, with consequences for the deceleration and trapping experiments of the kind described in the introduction.
Comparing the energy-level diagrams of = 30 helium Rydberg states for and at = 120 mT in the range = 0 - 1.6 V/cm presented in figure 18 nicely reveals the effects of on the structure of the = 0 and = +1 and -1 manifolds. The deviation from cylindrical symmetry in the = 30 case couples states differing in by , and levels show avoided crossings between = 0 levels and = +1 or -1 levels (see the two examples enclosed by black squares in figure 18(b)), which are coupled by this interaction in first order. The minimal separation between states differing in by at the crossings is proportional to the interaction between them and scales as . In contrast, the separation between = +1 and -1 levels at avoided crossings (see red circles in figure 18(b)) is very small and not visible on the scale of the figure, because the interaction between them acts only in second order (two steps of ).
Consideration of figures 7(b), 16 and 18, however, reveals that most crossings take place at low fields. Consequently, their adverse effect on deceleration and trapping could be reduced by lifting the electric-field minimum in the trap to V/cm, which can be achieved in the quadrupole-like trap used in our experiments [46, 47, 48] by applying a potential difference in the -direction across the end-cap electrodes.
4 Conclusions
The spectroscopy of Rydberg helium (*n *= 30) in a pure magnetic, a pure electric and combined magnetic and electric fields under arbitrary relative orientations was presented. The experimental spectra were recorded in the regime where the Stark and Zeeman interactions are much weaker than the Coulomb interaction but, at the same time, much stronger than the spin-orbit interaction, which was therefore neglected. The spectra of Rydberg helium in the external fields were also calculated by determining the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian matrix. All features of the experimental spectra (line positions and intensities) could be reproduced well by the calculations, especially in the regions where the levels of the adjacent manifolds do not overlap. This good agreement enabled us to quantify the degree of mixing induced by a nonparallel arrangement of the electric- and magnetic-field vectors and how it is affected by the relative strength of the electric and magnetic fields and the angle between them. The degree of mixing is particular large when the spacings between different levels of a given value induced by the quadratic Stark effect is of similar magnitude as the spacing between adjacent pure Zeeman levels. Particular emphasis was placed on the characterization of avoided crossings between Rydberg states in the range of electric and magnetic field strengths relevant for magnetic trapping of cold atoms and molecules following Rydberg-Stark deceleration.
We acknowledge financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation in the realm of the NCCR QSIT and also under project 200020-149216.
References
- [1]
Gallagher T F 1994 Rydberg Atoms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
- [2]
Stebbings R F and Dunning F B (eds) 1983 Rydberg States of Atoms and Molecules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
- [3]
Jenkins F A and Segre E 1939 Phys. Rev. 55 0052
- [4]
Garton W R S and Tomkins F S 1969 Astrophys. J. 158 839
- [5]
Zimmerman M L, Castro J C and Kleppner D 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 1083
- [6]
Droungas G, Karapanagioti N E and Connerade J P 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 191
- [7]
van der Veldt T, Vassen W and Hogervorst W 1992 J. Phys. B 25 3295
- [8]
Economou N P, Freeman R R and Liao P F 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 2506
- [9]
Holle A, Wiebusch G, Main J, Hager B, Rottke H and Welge K H 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 2594
- [10]
Zimmerman M L, Ducas T W, Littman M G and Kleppner D 1978 J. Phys. B 11 L11
- [11]
Zimmerman M L, Littman M G, Kash M M and Kleppner D 1979 Phys. Rev. A 20 2251
- [12]
Braun P A 1986 Opt. Spectrosc. 61 164
- [13]
Grebenkin K F and Rapaport L P 1986 Opt. Spectrosc. 60 523
- [14]
Lahaye C T W and Hogervorst W 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39 5658
- [15]
Ernst W E, Softley T P and Zare R N 1988 Phys. Rev. A 37 4172
- [16]
Fielding H H and Softley T P 1992 J. Phys. B 25 4125
- [17]
Gruetter M, Zehnder O, Softley T P and Merkt F 2008 J. Phys. B 41
- [18]
Bordas C, Broyer M, Chevaleyre J and Labastie P 1987 J. Phys.-Paris 48 647
- [19]
Chevaleyre J, Bordas C, Broyer M and Labastie P 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 3027
- [20]
Fielding H H and Softley T P 1991 Chem. Phys. Lett. 185 199
- [21]
Fielding H H and Softley T P 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 969
- [22]
Cacciani P, Liberman S, Luc-Koenig E, Pinard J and Thomas C 1988 J.Phys. B 21 3473
- [23]
Cacciani P, Liberman S, Luc-Koenig E, Pinard J and Thomas C 1988 J.Phys. B 21 3523
- [24]
Cacciani P, Luc-Koenig E, Pinard J, Thomas C and Liberman S 1988 J.Phys. B 21 3499
- [25]
Cacciani P, Delsart C, Luc-Koenig E and Pinard J 1992 J.Phys. B 25 1991
- [26]
van der Veldt T, Vassen W and Hogervorst W 1993 J. Phys. B 26 1945
- [27]
Paradis E, Zigo S and Raithel G 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 012505
- [28]
Wiebusch G, Main J, Kruger K, Rottke H, Holle A and Welge K H 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 2821
- [29]
Penent F, Delande D, Biraben F and Gay J C 1984 Opt. Commun. 49 184
- [30]
Penent C F, Delande D and Gay J C 1988 Phys. Rev. A 37 4707
- [31]
Korevaar E and Littman M G 1983 J. Phys. B 16 L437
- [32]
Abdulla A M, Hogan S, Zhan M S and Connerade J P 2004 J. Phys. B 37 L147
- [33]
Connerade J P, Hogan S D and Abdulla A M 2005 J. Phys. B 38 S141
- [34]
Burkova L A, Dzyaloshinsky I E, Drukarev G F and Monozon B S 1976 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 71 526
- [35]
Bhattacharya S K and Rau A R P 1982 Phys. Rev. A 26 2315
- [36]
Fauth M, Walther H and Werner E 1987 Z. Phys. D 7 293
- [37]
von Milczewski J, Diercksen G H F and Uzer T 1994 Phys. Rev Lett. 73 2428
- [38]
von Milczewski J and Uzer T 1997 Phys. Rev. E 55 6540
- [39]
Raithel G, Fauth M and Walther H 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 1898
- [40]
Raithel G, Fauth M and Walther H 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 419
- [41]
Pauli W 1926 Z. Phys. 36 336
- [42]
Solovev E A 1983 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 85 109
- [43]
Fassbinder P and Schweizer W 1996 Phys. Rev. A 53 2135
- [44]
Melezhik V S 1993 Phys. Rev. A 48 4528
- [45]
Main J, Schwacke M and Wunner G 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 1149
- [46]
Hogan S D and Merkt F 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 043001
- [47]
Seiler C, Hogan S D and Merkt F 2011 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 19000
- [48]
Hogan S D, Motsch M and Merkt F 2011 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 18705
- [49]
Riedel J, Hoekstra S, Jaeger W, Gilijamse J J, van de Meerakker S Y T and Meijer G 2011 Eur. Phys. J. D 65 161
- [50]
Allmendinger P, Agner J A, Schmutz H and Merkt F 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043433
- [51]
Martin W C 1987 Phys. Rev. A 36 3575
- [52]
Wintgen D, Holle A, Wiebusch G, Main J, Friedrich H and Welge K H 1986 J.Phys. B 19 L557
- [53]
Inglis D E and Teller E 1939 Astrophys. J. 90 439
- [54]
Santos J P, Mota-Furtado F, Laranjeira M F and Parente F 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 1703
- [55]
Braun P A and Solov’ev E A 1984 Sov. Phys. - JETP 59 38
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Gallagher T F 1994 Rydberg Atoms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
- 2[2] Stebbings R F and Dunning F B (eds) 1983 Rydberg States of Atoms and Molecules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
- 3[3] Jenkins F A and Segre E 1939 Phys. Rev. 55 0052
- 4[4] Garton W R S and Tomkins F S 1969 Astrophys. J. 158 839
- 5[5] Zimmerman M L, Castro J C and Kleppner D 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 1083
- 6[6] Droungas G, Karapanagioti N E and Connerade J P 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 191
- 7[7] van der Veldt T, Vassen W and Hogervorst W 1992 J. Phys. B 25 3295
- 8[8] Economou N P, Freeman R R and Liao P F 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 2506
