A Massive Shell of Supernova-formed Dust in SNR G54.1+0.3
Tea Temim, Eli Dwek, Richard G. Arendt, Kazimierz J. Borkowski,, Stephen P. Reynolds, Patrick Slane, Joseph D. Gelfand, John C. Raymond

TL;DR
This study analyzes infrared observations of supernova remnant G54.1+0.3, revealing a massive amount of dust likely formed in the supernova, with a dominant magnesium silicate component and implications for dust production in core-collapse supernovae.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of dust mass, composition, and distribution in G54.1+0.3, demonstrating significant SN-formed dust consistent with theoretical models and previous supernovae observations.
Findings
Dust mass estimated at 1.1 ± 0.8 solar masses.
Dominant dust component identified as magnesium silicate.
Dust likely formed in the supernova ejecta, not yet processed by reverse shock.
Abstract
While theoretical dust condensation models predict that most refractory elements produced in core-collapse supernovae (SNe) efficiently condense into dust, a large quantity of dust has so far only been observed in SN 1987A. We present the analysis of Spitzer Space Telescope, Herschel Space Observatory, Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA), and AKARI observations of the infrared (IR) shell surrounding the pulsar wind nebula in the supernova remnant G54.1+0.3. We attribute a distinctive spectral feature at 21 m to a magnesium silicate grain species that has been invoked in modeling the ejecta-condensed dust in Cas A, which exhibits the same spectral signature. If this species is responsible for producing the observed spectral feature and accounts for a significant fraction of the observed IR continuum, we find that it would be the dominant constituent of the dust…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
