Complexity in the light curves and spectra of slow-evolving superluminous supernovae

TL;DR

This paper presents detailed observations of slow-evolving superluminous supernovae, revealing common spectral and light curve features, and discusses their implications for understanding their complex ejecta structure and luminosity sources.

Contribution

It provides the first extensive dataset for four low-redshift slow-evolving superluminous supernovae, highlighting their shared spectral and light curve characteristics and proposing a complex ejecta structure as an explanation.

Findings

Spectral lines remain visible from 50 to 400 days

Light curves decline faster than $^{56}$Co decay after 150 days

Evidence suggests complex ejecta with multiple emitting zones

Abstract

A small group of the newly discovered superluminous supernovae show broad and slowly evolving light curves. Here we present extensive observational data for the slow-evolving superluminous supernova LSQ14an, which brings this group of transients to four in total in the low redshift Universe (z$<$0.2; SN 2007bi, PTF12dam, SN 2015bn). We particularly focus on the optical and near-infrared evolution during the period from 50 days up to 400 days from peak, showing that they are all fairly similar in their light curve and spectral evolution. LSQ14an shows broad, blue-shifted [O III] $\lambda\lambda$4959, 5007 lines, as well as a blue-shifted [O II] $\lambda\lambda$7320, 7330 and [Ca II] $\lambda\lambda$7291, 7323. Furthermore, the sample of these four objects shows common features. Semi-forbidden and forbidden emission lines appear surprisingly early at 50-70 days and remain visible with almost no variation up to 400 days. The spectra remain blue out to 400 days. There are small, but discernible light curve fluctuations in all of them. The light curve of each shows a faster decline than $^{56}$Co after 150 days and it further steepens after 300 days. We also expand our analysis presenting X-ray limits for LSQ14an and SN2015bn and discuss their diagnostic power in interpreting their common features. These features are quite distinct from the faster evolving superluminous supernovae and are not easily explained in terms of only a variation in ejecta mass. While a central engine is still the most likely luminosity source, it appears that the ejecta structure is complex, with multiple emitting zones and at least some interaction between the expanding ejecta and surrounding material.