Bayesian modelling of lung function data from multiple-breath washout tests
Robert K. Mahar, John B. Carlin, Sarath Ranganathan, Anne-Louise, Ponsonby, Peter Vuillermin, Damjan Vukcevic

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian statistical model for infant lung function data from multiple-breath washout tests, improving data utilization and enabling analysis of incomplete or shorter tests, thus enhancing research and clinical assessments.
Contribution
The study develops a novel Bayesian model for infant MBW data that allows for analysis of incomplete tests and improves data efficiency over traditional methods.
Findings
Model fits data well and clarifies statistical properties of empirical summaries.
Enables estimation of lung clearance index from incomplete or shorter tests.
Facilitates use of previously discarded data, improving research and clinical practice.
Abstract
Paediatric respiratory researchers have widely adopted the multiple-breath washout (MBW) test because it allows assessment of lung function in unsedated infants and is well suited to longitudinal studies of lung development and disease. However, a substantial proportion of MBW tests in infants fail current acceptability criteria. We hypothesised that a model-based approach to analysing the data, in place of traditional simple empirical summaries, would enable more efficient use of these tests. We therefore developed a novel statistical model for infant MBW data and applied it to 1,197 tests from 432 individuals from a large birth cohort study. We focus on Bayesian estimation of the lung clearance index (LCI), the most commonly used summary of lung function from MBW tests. Our results show that the model provides an excellent fit to the data and shed further light on statistical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
