We belong together? A plea for modesty in modal plural logic
Simon Hewitt

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the motivations behind adopting strong modal plural logics, questioning their foundational assumptions and advocating for a more modest approach in their development.
Contribution
It offers a skeptical analysis of the reasons for strong modal plural logics and argues for a more cautious, modest stance in their philosophical justification.
Findings
Challenges the motivation for strong modal plural logics
Advocates for modesty in modal plural logic development
Highlights philosophical concerns with current approaches
Abstract
A sceptical examination of the motivations for strong modal plural logics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
