JU_KS_Group@FIRE 2016: Consumer Health Information Search
Kamal Sarkar, Debanjan Das, Indra Banerjee, Mamta Kumari, Prasenjit, Biswas

TL;DR
This paper presents a system for consumer health information search that classifies relevant sentences and their stance relative to a query, achieving competitive accuracy in the FIRE 2016 shared task.
Contribution
The paper introduces a methodology for classifying and determining the stance of sentences in consumer health documents, with competitive results in a shared evaluation.
Findings
Achieved 73.39% accuracy in classifying relevant sentences.
Ranked third among nine teams in the shared task.
Demonstrated effective stance classification in health information retrieval.
Abstract
In this paper, we describe the methodology used and the results obtained by us for completing the tasks given under the shared task on Consumer Health Information Search (CHIS) collocated with the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation (FIRE) 2016, ISI Kolkata. The shared task consists of two sub-tasks - (1) task1: given a query and a document/set of documents associated with that query, the task is to classify the sentences in the document as relevant to the query or not and (2) task 2: the relevant sentences need to be further classified as supporting the claim made in the query, or opposing the claim made in the query. We have participated in both the sub-tasks. The percentage accuracy obtained by our developed system for task1 was 73.39 which is third highest among the 9 teams participated in the shared task.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Social Media in Health Education
