Weak phase retrieval and phaseless reconstruction
Sara Botello-Andrade, Peter G. Casazza, Dorsa Ghoreishi, Shani Jose,, Janet C. Tremain

TL;DR
This paper investigates weakened versions of phase retrieval and phaseless reconstruction in Hilbert spaces, revealing surprising equivalences and necessary conditions for weak phase retrieval.
Contribution
It introduces the concepts of weak phase retrieval and weak phaseless reconstruction, establishing their properties and relationships, including key equivalences and minimal vector requirements.
Findings
Weak phaseless reconstruction is equivalent to phaseless reconstruction.
Weak phase retrieval is not equivalent to weak phaseless reconstruction.
Weak phase retrieval requires at least 2m-2 vectors in an m-dimensional space.
Abstract
Phase retrieval and phaseless reconstruction for Hilbert space frames is a very active area of research. Recently, it was shown that these concepts are equivalent. In this paper, we make a detailed study of a weakening of these concepts to weak phase retrieval and weak phaseless reconstruction. We will give several necessary and/or sufficient conditions for frames to have these weak properties. We will prove three surprising results: (1) Weak phaseless reconstruction is equivalent to phaseless reconstruction. I.e. It never was "weak"; (2) Weak phase retrieval is not equivalent to weak phaseless reconstruction; (3) Weak phase retrieval requires at least vectors in an m-dimensional Hilbert space. We also gives several examples illustrating the relationship between these concepts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
