Robustness of synthetic oscillators in growing and dividing cells
Joris Paijmans, David K Lubensky, Pieter Rein ten Wolde

TL;DR
This paper investigates how synthetic gene oscillators behave within dividing cells, revealing that gene positioning and replication timing noise influence their stability and coupling to the cell cycle, with implications for designing robust biological systems.
Contribution
It extends previous work by analyzing the effects of gene location and replication timing noise on the stability and cell cycle coupling of synthetic oscillators.
Findings
Gene position affects oscillator-cell cycle coupling strength.
Replication timing noise weakens but does not eliminate coupling.
Synthetic oscillators remain coupled to the cell cycle even with high noise levels.
Abstract
Synthetic biology sets out to implement new functions in cells, and to develop a deeper understanding of biological design principles. In 2000, Elowitz and Leibler showed that by rational design of the reaction network, and using existing biological components, they could create a network that exhibits periodic gene expression, dubbed the repressilator (Elowitz and Leibler, Nature, 2000). More recently, Stricker et al. presented another synthetic oscillator, called the dual-feedback oscillator (Stricker et al., 2008), which is more stable. How the stability of these oscillators is affected by the intrinsic noise of the interactions between the components and the stochastic expression of their genes, has been studied in considerable detail. However, as all biological oscillators reside in growing and dividing cells, an important question is how these oscillators are perturbed by the cell…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
