Numerical evidence for bound secrecy from two-way post-processing in quantum key distribution

TL;DR

This paper provides analytical and numerical evidence for the existence of bound secrecy in quantum key distribution protocols, specifically in the error rate interval where secret key extraction is impossible but secrecy is present.

Contribution

It demonstrates that bound secrecy likely exists in certain quantum key distribution regimes and shows that generalized advantage distillation cannot surpass the known 27.6% error rate bound.

Findings

Bound secrecy exists between 27.6% and 33.3% error rates.

Generalized advantage distillation cannot break symmetric extendability beyond 27.6%.

Evidence suggests the 27.6% bound is tight for two-way post-processing protocols.

Abstract

Bound secret information is classical information that contains secrecy but from which secrecy cannot be extracted. The existence of bound secrecy has been conjectured but is currently unproven, and in this work we provide analytical and numerical evidence for its existence. Specifically, we consider two-way post-processing protocols in prepare-and-measure quantum key distribution based on the well-known six-state signal states. In terms of the quantum bit-error rate $Q$ of the classical data, such protocols currently exist for $Q<\frac{5-\sqrt{5}}{10}\approx 27.6\%$. On the other hand, for $Q\geq\frac{1}{3}$ no such protocol can exist as the observed data is compatible with an intercept-resend attack. This leaves the interesting question of whether successful protocols exist in the interval $\frac{5-\sqrt{5}}{10}\leq Q<\frac{1}{3}$. Previous work has shown that a necessary condition for the existence of two-way post-processing protocols for distilling secret key is breaking the symmetric extendability of the underlying quantum state shared by Alice and Bob. Using this result, it has been proven that symmetric extendability can be broken up to the $27.6\%$ lower bound using the advantage distillation protocol. In this work, we first show that to break symmetric extendability it is sufficient to consider a generalized form of advantage distillation consisting of one round of post-selection by Bob on a block of his data. We then provide evidence that such generalized protocols cannot break symmetric extendability beyond $27.6\%$. We thus have evidence to believe that $27.6\%$ is an upper bound on two-way post-processing and that the interval $\frac{5-\sqrt{5}}{10}\leq Q<\frac{1}{3}$ is a domain of bound secrecy.