A hardness result and new algorithm for the longest common palindromic subsequence problem
Shunsuke Inenaga, Heikki Hyyr\"o

TL;DR
This paper establishes the computational hardness of the 2-LCPS problem by relating it to the 4-LCS problem and introduces a new, more efficient algorithm for solving 2-LCPS based on string matching and character set properties.
Contribution
The paper proves the 2-LCPS problem is as hard as the 4-LCS problem and presents a novel algorithm with improved runtime under certain conditions.
Findings
The 2-LCPS problem is at least as hard as the 4-LCS problem.
The new algorithm runs in O(σ M^2 + n) time, improving over previous methods.
The algorithm is faster when the number of common characters σ is small.
Abstract
The 2-LCPS problem, first introduced by Chowdhury et al. [Fundam. Inform., 129(4):329-340, 2014], asks one to compute (the length of) a longest palindromic common subsequence between two given strings and . We show that the 2-LCPS problem is at least as hard as the well-studied longest common subsequence problem for four strings (the 4-LCS problem). Then, we present a new algorithm which solves the 2-LCPS problem in time, where denotes the length of and , denotes the number of matching positions between and , and denotes the number of distinct characters occurring in both and . Our new algorithm is faster than Chowdhury et al.'s sparse algorithm when .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgorithms and Data Compression · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
