Non-local thermodynamic equilibrium stellar spectroscopy with 1D and 3D models - II. Chemical properties of the Galactic metal-poor disc and the halo
Maria Bergemann (1), Remo Collet (2), Ralph Schoenrich (3), Rene, Andrae (1), Mikhail Kovalev (1), Gregory Ruchti (4), Camilla J. Hansen (5),, and Zazralt Magic (6) ((1) MPIA, (2) Aarhus University, ANU, (3) Oxford, (4), Lund Observatory, (5) Dark Cosmology Centre, TU Darmstadt

TL;DR
This study compares LTE and NLTE spectroscopic models for 326 stars, revealing biases affecting chemical abundance trends and providing clearer insights into the Galactic disc and halo's chemical evolution.
Contribution
It demonstrates the importance of using <3D>NLTE models for accurate stellar chemical properties, especially at low metallicities, improving interpretations of Galactic evolution.
Findings
<3D>NLTE models yield more accurate [Mg/Fe] and [Fe/H] trends.
Thick disc stars show constant [Mg/Fe] ~ 0.3 dex with low dispersion.
Halo stars exhibit diverse [Mg/Fe] ratios and a trend at low metallicities.
Abstract
From exploratory studies and theoretical expectations it is known that simplifying approximations in spectroscopic analysis (LTE, 1D) lead to systematic biases of stellar parameters and abundances. These biases depend strongly on surface gravity, temperature, and, in particular, for LTE vs. non-LTE (NLTE) on metallicity of the stars. Here we analyse the [Mg/Fe] and [Fe/H] plane of a sample of 326 stars, comparing LTE and NLTE results obtained using 1D hydrostatic models and averaged <3D> models. We show that compared to the <3D>NLTE benchmark, all other three methods display increasing biases towards lower metallicities, resulting in false trends of [Mg/Fe] against [Fe/H], which have profound implications for interpretations by chemical evolution models. In our best <3D> NLTE model, the halo and disc stars show a clearer behaviour in the [Mg/Fe] - [Fe/H] plane, from the knee in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
