The Kelmans-Seymour conjecture IV: a proof
Dawei He, Yan Wang, Xingxing Yu

TL;DR
This paper proves the Kelmans-Seymour conjecture, establishing that graphs without a subdivision of $K_5$ are either planar or have a small cut, advancing understanding of graph structure and planarity conditions.
Contribution
The paper provides a complete proof of the long-standing Kelmans-Seymour conjecture, confirming the structural property of graphs lacking a $K_5$ subdivision.
Findings
Proof of the Kelmans-Seymour conjecture.
Graphs without $K_5$ subdivision are planar or have a cut of size at most 4.
Discussion of related results and open problems.
Abstract
A well known theorem of Kuratowski in 1932 states that a graph is planar if, and only if, it does not contain a subdivision of or . Wagner proved in 1937 that if a graph other than does not contain any subdivision of then it is planar or it admits a cut of size at most 2. Kelmans and, independently, Seymour conjectured in the 1970s that if a graph does not contain any subdivision of then it is planar or it admits a cut of size at most 4. In this paper, we give a proof of the Kelmans-Seymour conjecture. We also discuss several related results and problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · graph theory and CDMA systems
