Performance of group testing algorithms with near-constant tests-per-item
Oliver Johnson, Matthew Aldridge, Jonathan Scarlett

TL;DR
This paper introduces a near-constant test-per-item design for nonadaptive group testing, demonstrating improved efficiency over Bernoulli designs and establishing optimality of the DD algorithm for certain sparsity regimes.
Contribution
The authors propose a new test design with nearly uniform test participation per item, achieving fewer tests and better performance than traditional Bernoulli designs.
Findings
23% fewer tests needed compared to Bernoulli designs.
Best known nonadaptive group testing performance for > 0.43.
DD algorithm is proven optimal for > 1/2.
Abstract
We consider the nonadaptive group testing with N items, of which are defective. We study a test design in which each item appears in nearly the same number of tests. For each item, we independently pick L tests uniformly at random with replacement, and place the item in those tests. We analyse the performance of these designs with simple and practical decoding algorithms in a range of sparsity regimes, and show that the performance is consistently improved in comparison with standard Bernoulli designs. We show that our new design requires 23% fewer tests than a Bernoulli design when paired with the simple decoding algorithms known as COMP and DD. This gives the best known nonadaptive group testing performance for , and the best proven performance with a practical decoding algorithm for all . We also give a converse result showing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
