Statistical errors and systematic biases in the calibration of the convective core overshooting with eclipsing binaries. A case study: TZ Fornacis
G. Valle, M. Dell'Omodarme, P.G. Prada Moroni, S. Degl'Innocenti

TL;DR
This study investigates biases in calibrating convective core overshooting using eclipsing binaries, emphasizing the importance of accounting for uncertainties and high-precision measurements to obtain reliable stellar parameters.
Contribution
It demonstrates the impact of unaccounted uncertainties on overshooting calibration and highlights the necessity of precise data and robust statistical methods in binary star analysis.
Findings
Multiple solution groups with different ages and overshooting parameters.
High-precision mass measurements are crucial for accurate parameter estimation.
Fixed $\\Delta Y/\\Delta Z$ grids can bias age and overshooting estimates.
Abstract
We attempt to constrain the initial helium abundance, the age and the efficiency of the convective core overshooting of the binary system TZ Fornacis. Our main aim is in pointing out the biases in the results due to not accounting for some sources of uncertainty. We adopt the SCEPtER pipeline, relying on stellar models computed with two stellar evolutionary codes (FRANEC and MESA). We found multiple independent groups of solutions. The best one suggests a system of age 1.10 0.07 Gyr (primary star in the central helium burning stage, secondary in the sub-giant branch), with a helium-to-metal enrichment ratio of and core overshooting parameter (FRANEC) and (MESA). The second class of solutions, characterised by a worse goodness-of-fit, still suggest a primary star in the central helium-burning stage but a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
