Clustering of quasars in the First Year of the SDSS-IV eBOSS survey: Interpretation and halo occupation distribution
Sergio A. Rodr\'iguez-Torres, Johan Comparat, Francisco Prada, Gustavo, Yepes, Etienne Burtin, Pauline Zarrouk, Pierre Laurent, ChangHoon Hahn, Peter, Behroozi, Anatoly Klypin, Ashley Ross, Rita Tojeiro, Gong-Bo Zhao

TL;DR
This study analyzes the clustering of approximately 70,000 quasars from the SDSS-IV eBOSS survey, modeling their halo occupation and bias evolution to improve understanding of quasar environments and cosmological implications.
Contribution
It provides the first clustering analysis of eBOSS quasars, develops high-fidelity mock catalogues, and models quasar host halo properties using a modified Halo Abundance Matching approach.
Findings
Quasars are hosted by halos with masses around 10^12.7 solar masses.
Quasar bias increases from 1.54 at z=1.06 to 3.15 at z=1.98.
Current data cannot distinguish models with different satellite fractions.
Abstract
In current and future surveys, quasars play a key role. The new data will extend our knowledge of the Universe as it will be used to better constrain the cosmological model at redshift via baryon acoustic oscillation and redshift space distortion measurements. Here, we present the first clustering study of quasars observed by the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey. We measure the clustering of quasars located in the redshift range that cover 1,168 deg. We model the clustering and produce high-fidelity quasar mock catalogues based on the BigMultiDark Planck simulation. Thus, we use a modified (Sub)Halo Abundance Matching model to account for the specificities of the halo population hosting quasars. We find that quasars are hosted by halos with masses and their bias evolves from 1.54 () to 3.15 ().…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
