Experimental investigation of Popper's proposed ghost-diffraction experiment
Eliot Bolduc, Ebrahim Karimi, Kevin Pich\'e, Jonathan Leach, and, Robert W. Boyd

TL;DR
This study experimentally tests Popper's ghost-diffraction proposal, finding that the entangled partner does not exhibit increased diffraction, thereby providing insights into entanglement and challenging certain interpretations of quantum mechanics.
Contribution
The paper presents the first experimental implementation of Popper's ghost-diffraction experiment, clarifying its implications for quantum entanglement and the Copenhagen interpretation.
Findings
Partner beam does not undergo increased diffractive spreading
Results support the non-local nature of entanglement
Insights into the relationship between entanglement and the uncertainty principle
Abstract
In an effort to challenge the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, Karl Popper proposed an experiment involving spatially separated entangled particles. In this experiment, one of the particles passes through a very narrow slit, and thereby its position becomes well-defined. This particle therefore diffracts into a large divergence angle; this effect can be understood as a consequence of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Popper further argued that its entangled partner would become comparably localized in position, and that, according to his understanding of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the \qo{mere knowledge} of the position of this particle would cause it also to diffract into a large divergence angle. Popper recognized that such behaviour could violate the principle of causality in that the slit could be removed and the partner particle would be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
