Inconsistency of Minkowski higher-derivative theories
Ugo G. Aglietti, Damiano Anselmi

TL;DR
Minkowski higher-derivative quantum field theories are generally inconsistent due to nonlocal, non-Hermitian divergences that cannot be renormalized, especially when propagators have complex poles, affecting their physical viability.
Contribution
This paper demonstrates the inherent inconsistencies in Minkowski higher-derivative theories caused by complex poles and nonlocal divergences, challenging their use in quantum field theory.
Findings
Complex divergences arise in self-energies and three-point functions.
Standard power counting rules are invalidated in these theories.
Counterterms violate locality and Hermiticity in scalar and gravity models.
Abstract
We show that Minkowski higher-derivative quantum field theories are generically inconsistent, because they generate nonlocal, non-Hermitian ultraviolet divergences, which cannot be removed by means of standard renormalization procedures. By "Minkowski theories" we mean theories that are defined directly in Minkowski spacetime. The problems occur when the propagators have complex poles, so that the correlation functions cannot be obtained as the analytic continuations of their Euclidean versions. The usual power counting rules fail and are replaced by much weaker ones. Self-energies generate complex divergences proportional to inverse powers of D'Alembertians. Three-point functions give more involved nonlocal divergences, which couple to infrared effects. We illustrate the violations of the locality and Hermiticity of counterterms in scalar models and higher-derivative gravity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
