Pruning The ELM Survey: Characterizing Candidate Low-Mass White Dwarfs Through Photometric Variability
Keaton J. Bell, A. Gianninas, J. J. Hermes, D. E. Winget, Mukremin, Kilic, M. H. Montgomery, B. G. Castanheira, Z. Vanderbosch, K. I. Winget, and, Warren R. Brown

TL;DR
This study investigates photometric variability in candidate low-mass white dwarfs from the ELM Survey, discovering new pulsators, questioning some classifications, and highlighting the presence of false positives possibly related to sdA stars.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed variability analysis of ELM Survey candidates, identifying new pulsators and challenging their classification as true ELM white dwarfs.
Findings
Discovered three new pulsating stars near the ELM instability strip.
Found that some candidates are likely not ELM white dwarfs but other stellar types.
Identified potential false positives related to sdA stars in the survey.
Abstract
We assess the photometric variability of nine stars with spectroscopic Teff and log(g) values from the ELM Survey that locate them near the empirical extremely low-mass (ELM) white dwarf instability strip. We discover three new pulsating stars: SDSS J135512.34+195645.4, SDSS J173521.69+213440.6 and SDSS J213907.42+222708.9. However, these are among the few ELM Survey objects that do not show radial velocity variations to confirm the binary nature expected of helium-core white dwarfs. The dominant 4.31-hr pulsation in SDSS J135512.34+195645.4 far exceeds the theoretical cutoff for surface reflection in a white dwarf, and this target is likely a high-amplitude delta Scuti pulsator with an overestimated surface gravity. We estimate the probability to be less than 0.0008 that the lack of measured radial velocity variations in four of eight other pulsating candidate ELM white dwarfs could be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
