How Predictable are Symptoms in Psychopathological Networks? A Reanalysis of 18 Published Datasets
Jonas M B Haslbeck, Eiko I Fried

TL;DR
This study introduces a new measure called predictability to assess how much individual symptoms in psychopathological networks are determined by their neighbors, providing insights beyond traditional centrality measures.
Contribution
The paper presents the concept of predictability as an absolute measure of node determination in psychopathological networks and applies it to 18 datasets, revealing its variability and clinical relevance.
Findings
Predictability varies considerably within and between datasets.
Higher predictability in community samples compared to clinical samples.
Predictability is highest in mood and anxiety disorders, lowest in psychosis.
Abstract
Background Network analyses on psychopathological data focus on the network structure and its derivatives such as node centrality. One conclusion one can draw from centrality measures is that the node with the highest centrality is likely to be the node that is determined most by its neighboring nodes. However, centrality is a relative measure: knowing that a node is highly central gives no information about the extent to which it is determined by its neighbors. Here we provide an absolute measure of determination (or controllability) of a node - its predictability. We introduce predictability, estimate the predictability of all nodes in 18 prior empirical network papers on psychopathology, and statistically relate it to centrality. Methods We carried out a literature review and collected 25 datasets from 18 published papers in the field (several mood and anxiety disorders, substance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
