Self-Correcting Models for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
Erik Talvitie

TL;DR
This paper introduces a theoretical analysis and a new algorithm for self-correcting models in model-based reinforcement learning, demonstrating improved robustness to model inaccuracies and providing performance guarantees.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical framework for self-correcting models in MBRL and proposes an algorithm with robustness guarantees for deterministic MDPs.
Findings
Self-correcting models improve MBRL performance with flawed models.
A novel error bound relates self-correction ability to MBRL success.
The proposed algorithm offers performance guarantees despite model class limitations.
Abstract
When an agent cannot represent a perfectly accurate model of its environment's dynamics, model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) can fail catastrophically. Planning involves composing the predictions of the model; when flawed predictions are composed, even minor errors can compound and render the model useless for planning. Hallucinated Replay (Talvitie 2014) trains the model to "correct" itself when it produces errors, substantially improving MBRL with flawed models. This paper theoretically analyzes this approach, illuminates settings in which it is likely to be effective or ineffective, and presents a novel error bound, showing that a model's ability to self-correct is more tightly related to MBRL performance than one-step prediction error. These results inspire an MBRL algorithm for deterministic MDPs with performance guarantees that are robust to model class limitations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics
