Nonexistence of fractional Brownian fields indexed by cylinders
Nil Venet

TL;DR
This paper proves the nonexistence of fractional Brownian fields on cylinders and similar spaces, revealing limitations of classical kernels for Gaussian modeling on such metric spaces.
Contribution
It demonstrates that fractional Brownian fields cannot be defined on cylinders and extends this to Riemannian products, highlighting challenges in kernel construction on these spaces.
Findings
No fractional Brownian field exists on cylinders for any H>0.
The kernel d^{2H} is not negative definite on cylinders, affecting Gaussian process modeling.
Discontinuity of negative definiteness set under Gromov-Hausdorff convergence.
Abstract
We show in this paper that there exists no -fractional Brownian field indexed by the cylinder endowed with its product distance for any and . This is equivalent to say that is not a negative definite kernel, which also leaves us without a proof that many classical stationary kernels, such that the Gaussian and exponential kernels, are positive definite kernels -- or covariances -- on the cylinder. We generalise this result from the cylinder to any Riemannian Cartesian product with a minimal closed geodesic. We also investigate the case of the cylinder endowed with a distance asymptotically close to the product distance in the neighbourhood of a circle. Another consequence is the discontinuity of the set of such that is negative definite with respect to the Gromov-Hausdorff convergence on compact…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
