
TL;DR
This paper clarifies the criteria for null surfaces in static space-times, demonstrating that the condition $g_{tt}=0$ correctly identifies null surfaces, correcting previous misconceptions involving $g^{rr}=0$ and coordinate singularities.
Contribution
The paper critically analyzes and corrects the criteria for null surfaces in static space-times, emphasizing the proper use of coordinate systems and induced metrics.
Findings
Surfaces with $g_{tt}=0$ are null in static space-times.
The condition $g^{rr}=0$ is not the correct criterion for null surfaces.
Coordinate singularities can mislead the identification of null surfaces.
Abstract
In this paper I consider surfaces in a space-time with a Killing vector that is time-like and hypersurface orthogonal on one side of the surface. The Killing vector may be either time-like or space-like on the other side of the surface. It has been argued that the surface is null if as the surface is approached from the static region. This implies that, in a coordinate system adapted to , surfaces with are null. In spherically symmetric space-times the condition instead of is sometimes used to locate null surfaces. In this paper I examine the arguments that lead to these two different criteria and show that both arguments are incorrect. A surface constant has a normal vector whose norm is proportional to . This lead to the conclusion that surfaces with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
