A Comment on Argumentation
Karl Schlechta (LIF)
TL;DR
This paper proposes a new argumentation theory based on default logic, aiming to enhance understanding of reasoning processes.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to argumentation by applying default logic, providing a new theoretical framework.
Findings
Develops an outline of a new argumentation theory
Links default logic to argumentation reasoning
Sets groundwork for further formalization
Abstract
We use the theory of defaults and their meaning of [GS16] to develop (the outline of a) new theory of argumentation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Semantic Web and Ontologies