Machine Learning, Linear and Bayesian Models for Logistic Regression in Failure Detection Problems
B. Pavlyshenko

TL;DR
This paper compares machine learning, linear, and Bayesian logistic regression models for manufacturing failure detection using Kaggle data, highlighting their respective advantages in classification accuracy, interpretability, and probabilistic analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analysis of different logistic regression approaches, including Bayesian methods, for failure detection in manufacturing.
Findings
XGBoost achieves high classification scores.
Linear models facilitate factor influence analysis.
Bayesian models provide parameter distributions for risk assessment.
Abstract
In this work, we study the use of logistic regression in manufacturing failures detection. As a data set for the analysis, we used the data from Kaggle competition Bosch Production Line Performance. We considered the use of machine learning, linear and Bayesian models. For machine learning approach, we analyzed XGBoost tree based classifier to obtain high scored classification. Using the generalized linear model for logistic regression makes it possible to analyze the influence of the factors under study. The Bayesian approach for logistic regression gives the statistical distribution for the parameters of the model. It can be useful in the probabilistic analysis, e.g. risk assessment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems
MethodsLogistic Regression
