Regression assisted inference for the average treatment effect in paired experiments
Colin B. Fogarty

TL;DR
This paper introduces regression-assisted estimators for the average treatment effect in paired experiments, improving inference accuracy and efficiency even with covariate imbalances and model misspecification.
Contribution
It proposes two new regression-based estimators that are consistent and asymptotically conservative, enhancing analysis of paired experiments without strict model assumptions.
Findings
Regression-assisted estimators have smaller or equal variance compared to standard methods.
The estimators are consistent even if the regression model is misspecified.
Simulation studies show improved performance in small and moderate samples.
Abstract
In paired randomized experiments individuals in a given matched pair may differ on prognostically important covariates despite the best efforts of practitioners. We examine the use of regression adjustment as a way to correct for persistent covariate imbalances after randomization, and present two regression assisted estimators for the sample average treatment effect in paired experiments. Using the potential outcomes framework, we prove that these estimators are consistent for the sample average treatment effect under mild regularity conditions even if the regression model is improperly specified. Further, we describe how asymptotically conservative confidence intervals can be constructed. We demonstrate that the variances of the regression assisted estimators are at least as small as that of the standard difference-in-means estimator asymptotically. Through a simulation study, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
