Predictability Hidden by Anomalous Observations
Lorenzo Camponovo, Olivier Scaillet, Fabio Trojani

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new testing framework for predictive regressions that remains reliable despite small violations of assumptions, revealing hidden market return predictability in the presence of anomalous data.
Contribution
The authors develop a robust testing method compatible with nearly integrated regressors and approximate models, improving inference in complex predictive regression settings.
Findings
The new approach significantly outperforms existing tests in simulations.
Empirical analysis uncovers strong evidence of market return predictability.
Predictive variables like dividend yield and volatility risk premium are effective in revealing hidden signals.
Abstract
Testing procedures for predictive regressions with lagged autoregressive variables imply a suboptimal inference in presence of small violations of ideal assumptions. We propose a novel testing framework resistant to such violations, which is consistent with nearly integrated regressors and applicable to multi-predictor settings, when the data may only approximately follow a predictive regression model. The Monte Carlo evidence demonstrates large improvements of our approach, while the empirical analysis produces a strong robust evidence of market return predictability hidden by anomalous observations, both in- and out-of-sample, using predictive variables such as the dividend yield or the volatility risk premium.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
