Mass and Eccentricity Constraints in the WASP-47 Planetary System from a Simultaneous Analysis of Radial Velocities & Transit Timing Variations
Lauren M. Weiss, Katherine Deck, Evan Sinukoff, Erik A. Petigura, Eric, Agol, Eve J. Lee, Juliette C. Becker, Andrew W. Howard, Howard Isaacson, Ian, J. M. Crossfield, Benjamin J. Fulton, and Lea Hirsch

TL;DR
This study combines radial velocity and transit timing variation data to precisely measure the masses and orbital characteristics of the WASP-47 planetary system, revealing similarities to our solar system and challenging existing formation theories.
Contribution
It provides the first simultaneous analysis of RVs and TTVs for WASP-47, improving mass estimates and offering new insights into its formation history.
Findings
WASP-47's planets have nearly circular, coplanar orbits.
The system's planets are not in mean motion resonances.
Planets exhibit diverse compositions similar to the solar system.
Abstract
Measuring precise planet masses, densities, and orbital dynamics in individual planetary systems is an important pathway toward understanding planet formation. The WASP-47 system has an unusual architecture that motivates a complex formation theory. The system includes a hot Jupiter ("b") neighbored by interior ("e") and exterior ("d") sub-Neptunes, and a long-period eccentric giant planet ("c"). We simultaneously modeled transit times from the Kepler K2 Mission and 118 radial velocities to determine precise masses, densities, and Keplerian orbital elements of the WASP-47 planets. Combining RVs and TTVs provides a better estimate of the mass of planet d (13.6\pm2.0~M_\odot) than obtained with only RVs () or TTVs (). Planets e and d have high densities for their size, consistent with a history of photo-evaporation and/or formation in a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
