Variable classification in the LSST era: Exploring a model for quasi-periodic light curves
J. C. Zinn (1), C. S. Kochanek (1, 2), S. Koz{\l}owski (3), A., Udalski (3), M. K. Szyma\'nski (3), I. Soszy\'nski (3), \L. Wyrzykowski (3),, K. Ulaczyk (3, 4), R. Poleski (3, 1), P. Pietrukowicz (3), J. Skowron, (3), P. Mr\'oz (3), M. Pawlak (3) ((1) Department of Astronomy

TL;DR
This paper evaluates stochastic process models, specifically DRW and QPO, for classifying variable stars and quasars in large LSST datasets, highlighting the effectiveness and limitations of these models in automated classification.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of DRW and QPO models for variable star classification, emphasizing the potential of QPO parameters to distinguish variable types.
Findings
QPO models better describe periodic and quasi-periodic variables.
DRW models are more suitable for quasars.
QPO parameters effectively differentiate variable classes.
Abstract
LSST is expected to yield ~10^7 light curves over the course of its mission, which will require a concerted effort in automated classification. Stochastic processes provide one means of quantitatively describing variability with the potential advantage over simple light curve statistics that the parameters may be physically meaningful. Here, we survey a large sample of periodic, quasi-periodic, and stochastic OGLE-III variables using the damped random walk (DRW, CARMA(1,0)) and quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO, CARMA(2,1)) stochastic process models. The QPO model is described by an amplitude, a period, and a coherence time-scale, while the DRW has only an amplitude and a time-scale. We find that the periodic and quasi-periodic stellar variables are generally better described by a QPO than a DRW, while quasars are better described by the DRW model. There are ambiguities in interpreting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
