
TL;DR
This paper explores unique features of the BFKL approach at NNLLA, highlighting the need to modify derivation schemes due to complex amplitude behaviors and the importance of imaginary parts in unitarity relations.
Contribution
It identifies the peculiar properties of NNLLA BFKL and proposes changes to the derivation scheme to account for non-factorized amplitudes and imaginary parts.
Findings
Violation of simple factorized form in NNLLA
Necessity to include imaginary parts of amplitudes
Modified derivation scheme for NNLLA BFKL
Abstract
Peculiar properties of the BFKL approach in the next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic approximation (NNLLA) are discussed. In this approximation the scheme of derivation of the BFKL equation must be changed because of violation of the simple factorized form of amplitudes with multi-Reggeon exchanges and necessity to take into account imaginary parts of amplitudes in the unitarity relations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
