Low-energy enhancement and fluctuations of $\gamma$-ray strength functions in $^{56,57}$Fe: test of the Brink-Axel hypothesis
A. C. Larsen, M. Guttormsen, N. Blasi, A. Bracco, F. Camera, L. Crespo, Campo, T. K. Eriksen, A. G\"orgen, T. W. Hagen, V. W. Ingeberg, B. V. Kheswa,, S. Leoni, J. E. Midtb\o, B. Million, H. T. Nyhus, T. Renstr{\o}m, S. J. Rose,, I. E. Ruud, S. Siem, T. G. Tornyi, G. M. Tveten

TL;DR
This study confirms a significant low-energy enhancement in the gamma-ray strength functions of $^{56,57}$Fe, supports the Brink-Axel hypothesis, and provides detailed experimental insights into their dipole nature and excitation-energy independence.
Contribution
The paper provides experimental validation of the low-energy gamma-ray strength enhancement and tests the Brink-Axel hypothesis in $^{56,57}$Fe using high-resolution measurements.
Findings
Low-energy gamma-ray strength enhancement up to 30 times theoretical models.
Dipole nature of the low-energy enhancement confirmed by angular distributions.
No significant excitation-energy dependence of gamma-ray strength observed.
Abstract
Nuclear level densities and -ray strength functions of Fe have been extracted from proton- coincidences. A low-energy enhancement in the -ray strength functions up to a factor of 30 over common theoretical E1 models is confirmed. Angular distributions of the low-energy enhancement in Fe indicate its dipole nature, in agreement with findings for Fe. The high statistics and the excellent energy resolution of the large-volume LaBr(Ce) detectors allowed for a thorough analysis of strength as function of excitation energy. Taking into account the presence of strong Porter-Thomas fluctuations, there is no indication of any significant excitation-energy dependence in the -ray strength function, in support of the generalized Brink-Axel hypothesis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
