Maximizing switching current of superconductor nanowires via improved impedance matching
Labao Zhang, Xiachao Yan, Xiaoqing Jia, Jian Chen, Lin Kang, and, Peiheng Wu

TL;DR
This paper introduces an improved impedance matching circuit that enhances the switching current in superconductor nanowires by effectively releasing phase slip transitions, with potential applications in superconducting devices and quantum phase slip research.
Contribution
It presents a novel impedance matching technique that significantly increases the switching current in superconductor nanowires by reducing reflection effects caused by impedance mismatching.
Findings
Switching current increased from 8.0 μA to 12.2 μA with impedance matching.
Impedance matching reduces reflection, maximizing switching current.
Voltage pulses enable direct registration of phase slip transitions.
Abstract
The temporary resistance triggered by phase slip will result in the switching of superconductor nanowire to a permanent normal state, decreasing the switching current. In this letter, we propose an improved impedance matching circuit that releases the transition triggered by phase slips to the load resistor through the RF port of a bias tee. The transportation properties with different load resistors indicate that the switching current decreases due to the reflection caused by impedance mismatching, and is maximized by optimized impedance matching. Compared to the same setup without impedance matching circuit, the switching current was increased from 8.0 micro A to 12.2 micro A in a niobium nitride nanowire after releasing the temporary transition triggered by phase slips. The leakage process with impedance matching outputs a voltage pulse which enables the user to directly register the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
