Dreidel Fairness Study
Robert Nemiroff, Eva Nemiroff

TL;DR
This study tests the fairness of different dreidels by spinning them hundreds of times, revealing that all tested dreidels are biased, which could impact the fairness of traditional games and celebrations.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that common dreidels are biased, challenging assumptions of fairness in traditional spinning games.
Findings
All three dreidels tested were biased.
Some sides of each dreidel appeared significantly more often.
Biases could influence game fairness and cultural practices.
Abstract
Are dreidels fair? In other words, does the average dreidel have an equal chance of turning up any one of its four sides? To explore this hypothesis, three different dreidels were each spun hundreds of times with the number of occurrences of each side recorded. It was found that all three dreidels tested -- a cheap plastic dreidel, an old wooden dreidel, and a dreidel that came embossed with a picture of Santa Claus -- were not fair. Statistically, for each dreidel, some sides came up significantly more often than others. Although an unfair dreidel does not necessarily make the game itself unfair, it is conjectured that hundreds of pounds of chocolate have been distributed during Chanukah under false pretenses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
