Quantitative Comparison of Abundance Structures of Generalized Communities: From B-Cell Receptor Repertoires to Microbiomes
Mohammadkarim Saeedghalati, Farnoush Farahpour, Bettina Budeus, Anja, Lange, Astrid M. Westendorf, Marc Seifert, Ralf K\"uppers, Daniel Hoffmann

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new normalization method for Rank Abundance Distributions (RADs) that allows for effective quantitative comparison of diverse biological communities, including microbiomes and immune cell repertoires.
Contribution
The study develops the MaxRank normalization technique, enabling standardized, comparable RADs across various community types in biology.
Findings
Normalized RADs reveal structural differences among communities.
The method facilitates comparison of microbiomes from different environments.
RAD analysis uncovers community dynamics and diversity patterns.
Abstract
The \emph{community}, the assemblage of organisms co-existing in a given space and time, has the potential to become one of the unifying concepts of biology, especially with the advent of high-throughput sequencing experiments that reveal genetic diversity exhaustively. In this spirit we show that a tool from community ecology, the Rank Abundance Distribution (RAD), can be turned by the new MaxRank normalization method into a generic, expressive descriptor for quantitative comparison of communities in many areas of biology. To illustrate the versatility of the method, we analyze RADs from various \emph{generalized communities}, i.e.\ assemblages of genetically diverse cells or organisms, including human B cells, gut microbiomes under antibiotic treatment and of different ages and countries of origin, and other human and environmental microbial communities. We show that normalized RADs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
