Impurity bound states in fully gapped $d$-wave superconductors with subdominant order parameters
Mahdi Mashkoori, Kristofer Bj\"ornson, Annica M. Black-Schaffer

TL;DR
This paper investigates impurity-induced bound states in fully gapped $d$-wave superconductors with subdominant order parameters, revealing distinct behaviors for magnetic and potential impurities in $d+is$- and $d+id'$-wave states.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analytical and numerical study of impurity effects in fully gapped $d$-wave superconductors with subdominant order parameters, highlighting their fundamental differences.
Findings
Potential impurities do not produce bound states in $d+is$-wave superconductors.
Magnetic impurities induce bound states with zero-energy crossing at finite scattering in $d+is$-wave.
In $d+id'$-wave states, two pairs of bound states always form, with zero-energy crossing depending on particle-hole asymmetry.
Abstract
Impurities in superconductors and their induced bound states are important both for engineering novel states such as Majorana zero-energy modes and for probing bulk properties of the superconducting state. The high-temperature cuprates offer a clear advantage in a much larger superconducting order parameter, but the nodal energy spectrum of a pure -wave superconductor only allows virtual bound states. Fully gapped -wave superconducting states have however been proposed in several cuprate systems thanks to subdominant order parameters producing - or -wave superconducting states. Here we study both magnetic and potential impurities in these fully gapped -wave superconductors. Using analytical T-matrix and complementary numerical tight-binding lattice calculations, we show that magnetic and potential impurities behave fundamentally different in - and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
