Search for $CP$ violation in the phase space of $D^0\rightarrow\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-$ decays
LHCb collaboration: R. Aaij, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, Z. Ajaltouni, S., Akar, J. Albrecht, F. Alessio, M. Alexander, S. Ali, G. Alkhazov, P. Alvarez, Cartelle, A.A. Alves Jr, S. Amato, S. Amerio, Y. Amhis, L. An, L. Anderlini,, G. Andreassi, M. Andreotti, J.E. Andrews

TL;DR
This paper reports the first application of the energy test to search for $CP$ violation in four-body $D^0$ decays, finding results consistent with $CP$ symmetry within current sensitivity limits.
Contribution
It introduces the energy test method to four-body decays and extends the search for $CP$ violation to include $P$-odd asymmetries, providing the most sensitive test to date.
Findings
No significant $CP$ violation observed; data consistent with symmetry.
Achieved the world's best sensitivity to $CP$ violation in this decay.
Marginal evidence for $CP$ non-conservation at 2.7 sigma.
Abstract
A search for time-integrated violation in the Cabibbo-suppressed decay \mbox{D^0\rightarrow\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-} is performed using an unbinned, model-independent technique known as the energy test. This is the first application of the energy test in four-body decays. The search is performed for -even asymmetries and, for the first time, is extended to probe the -odd case. Using proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.0 fb collected by the LHCb detector at centre-of-mass energies of 7 TeV and 8 TeV, the world's best sensitivity to violation in this decay is obtained. The data are found to be consistent with the hypothesis of symmetry with a -value of in the -even case, and marginally consistent with a -value of in the -odd case, corresponding to a significance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
