Is a typical bi-Perron number a pseudo-Anosov dilatation?
Hyungryul Baik, Ahmad Rafiqi, Chenxi Wu

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether typical bi-Perron algebraic units are pseudo-Anosov dilatations, showing that most do not correspond to such dilatations for surfaces of genus at least 10, with implications for moduli space geodesics.
Contribution
It provides a partial answer to the question of whether typical bi-Perron numbers are pseudo-Anosov dilatations, especially for high genus surfaces, and relates this to geodesic counts in moduli space.
Findings
Most bi-Perron algebraic units of degree up to 2n do not correspond to pseudo-Anosov dilatations for genus n≥10.
Asymptotic analysis shows the rarity of such dilatations among bi-Perron units.
Results imply bounds on the number of closed geodesics of the same length in certain moduli spaces.
Abstract
In this note, we deduce a partial answer to the question in the title. In particular, we show that asymptotically almost all bi-Perron algebraic unit whose characteristic polynomial has degree at most do not correspond to dilatations of pseudo-Anosov maps on a closed orientable surface of genus for . As an application of the argument, we also obtain a statement on the number of closed geodesics of the same length in the moduli space of area one abelian differentials for low genus cases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
