Classification of 2-extendable bipartite and cubic non-bipartite vertex-transitive graphs
Qiuli Li, Xing Gao

TL;DR
This paper characterizes 2-extendable bipartite and cubic non-bipartite vertex-transitive graphs, providing precise conditions based on girth and graph isomorphisms, thus advancing the understanding of graph extendability.
Contribution
It offers a complete classification of 2-extendable bipartite Cayley graphs and cubic non-bipartite Cayley graphs, including specific girth and isomorphism conditions.
Findings
Bipartite Cayley graphs are 2-extendable iff not a cycle.
Cubic non-bipartite Cayley graphs with girth ≥ 4 are 2-extendable unless isomorphic to specific graphs.
The Petersen graph is explicitly excluded from 2-extendability in the classification.
Abstract
In \cite{Chan95}, the authors classified the 2-extendable abelian Cayley graphs and posed the problem of characterizing all 2-extendable Cayley graphs. We first show that a connected bipartite Cayley (vertex-transitive) graph is 2-extendable if and only if it is not a cycle. It is known that a non-bipartite Cayley (vertex-transitive) graph is 2-extendable when it is of minimum degree at least five \cite{sun}. We next classify all 2-extendable cubic non-bipartite Cayley graphs and obtain that: a cubic non-bipartite Cayley graph with girth is 2-extendable if and only if and it doesn't isomorphic to or with . Indeed, we prove a more stronger result that a cubic non-bipartite vertex-transitive graph with girth is 2-extendable if and only if and it doesn't isomorphic to or …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInterconnection Networks and Systems · graph theory and CDMA systems · Finite Group Theory Research
