Six winters of photometry from Dome C, Antarctica: challenges, improvements, and results from the ASTEP experiment
N. Crouzet, D. M\'ekarnia, T. Guillot, L. Abe, A. Agabi, J.-P. Rivet,, I. Gon\c{c}alves, F.-X. Schmider, J.-B. Daban, Y. Fante\"i-Caujolle, C., Gouvret, D.D.R. Bayliss, G. Zhou, E. Aristidi, T. Fruth, A. Erikson, H., Rauer, J. Szul\'agyi, E. Bondoux, Z. Challita, C. Pouzenc

TL;DR
This paper reports on six winters of photometric observations from Dome C, Antarctica, highlighting technical challenges, improvements, and scientific results from the ASTEP experiment, demonstrating the site's potential for exoplanet research.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the operational challenges and technical solutions for conducting high-quality photometry in Antarctica over multiple winters.
Findings
The PSF FWHM averaged 4.5 arcsec, larger than expected due to local seeing and turbulence.
The defrosting system effectively prevents ice buildup on mirrors.
Site testing confirms ASTEP's potential for future Antarctic astronomical telescopes.
Abstract
ASTEP (Antarctica Search for Transiting ExoPlanets) is a pilot project that aims at searching and characterizing transiting exoplanets from Dome C in Antarctica and to qualify this site for photometry in the visible. Two instruments were installed at Dome C and ran for six winters in total. The analysis of the collected data is nearly complete. We present the operation of the instruments, and the technical challenges, limitations, and possible solutions in light of the data quality. The instruments performed continuous observations during the winters. Human interventions are required mainly for regular inspection and ice dust removal. A defrosting system is efficient at preventing and removing ice on the mirrors. The PSF FWHM is 4.5 arcsec on average which is 2.5 times larger than the specification, and is highly variable; the causes are the poor ground-level seeing, the turbulent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
