The Kepler Follow-Up Observation Program. I. A Catalog of Companions to Kepler Stars from High-Resolution Imaging
E. Furlan, D. R. Ciardi, M. E. Everett, M. Saylors, J. K. Teske, E. P., Horch, S. B. Howell, G. T. van Belle, L. A. Hirsch, T. N. III Gautier, E. R., Adams, D. Barrado, K. M. S. Cartier, C. D. Dressing, A. K. Dupree, R. L., Gilliland, J. Lillo-Box, P. W. Lucas, J. Wang

TL;DR
This paper catalogs stellar companions to Kepler planet host stars using high-resolution imaging, quantifies their impact on planet radius measurements, and discusses implications for exoplanet occurrence rates.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive catalog of companions to Kepler stars and analyzes how these companions affect planet radius estimates and occurrence statistics.
Findings
Approximately 10% of stars have close companions within 1".
Correcting for stellar companions increases estimated planet radii, reducing the count of small planets.
The true fraction of systems with close companions is higher than observed due to sensitivity limits.
Abstract
We present results from high-resolution, optical to near-IR imaging of host stars of Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs), identified in the original Kepler field. Part of the data were obtained under the Kepler imaging follow-up observation program over seven years (2009 - 2015). Almost 90% of stars that are hosts to planet candidates or confirmed planets were observed. We combine measurements of companions to KOI host stars from different bands to create a comprehensive catalog of projected separations, position angles, and magnitude differences for all detected companion stars (some of which may not be bound). Our compilation includes 2297 companions around 1903 primary stars. From high-resolution imaging, we find that ~10% (~30%) of the observed stars have at least one companion detected within 1" (4"). The true fraction of systems with close (< ~4") companions is larger than the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
