A remark on the construction of centric linking systems
Bob Oliver

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges in constructing centric linking systems for fusion systems, highlighting the limitations of inductive methods and clarifying the motivation behind Chermak's approach.
Contribution
It provides examples showing the difficulty of inductively constructing centric linking systems and clarifies the motivation for Chermak's proof of their existence.
Findings
Inductive construction methods are not generally feasible for centric linking systems.
Examples demonstrate the limitations of adding one conjugacy class at a time.
The work clarifies the motivation behind Chermak's proof technique.
Abstract
We give examples to show that it is not in general possible to prove the existence and uniqueness of centric linking systems associated to a given fusion system inductively by adding one conjugacy class at a time to the categories. This helps to explain why it was so difficult to prove that these categories always exist, and also helps to motivate the procedure used by Chermak when he did prove it.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
